Here it is, finally. I wanted to wait for New Year's Eve.
Thanks to Huinesoron for beta-ing my first thing.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bl01B1KsRROA7xPcSBPvHviD4EAhhH-hB0dm5axJIbg/edit?usp=sharing
Character gallery: https://imgur.com/a/8haGI (from Rinmarugames.com and the Covet Fashion app)
I want to put both characters in the Mary Sue division, or at least have one of them in Floaters.
The first story I want to spork is one of my own, the 3-parter that I have in some notebooks that I wrote when I was twelve. After that, I really want to tackle the miniature My Immortal, (https://www.fanfiction.net/s/12602418/1/Im-Not-Okay) which I've listened to a lot on Youtube.
-
Permission Request by
on 2018-01-01 00:45:00 UTC
Link to this
-
All righty... by
on 2018-01-01 17:18:00 UTC
Link to this
Overall, I think you're looking pretty good! Just a couple things I wanted to flag:
First, from Mei's bio, stealing all the left socks is funny. Telling Potterverse canon children that "Dumbledore dies in the end" is less so. Be careful that Mei's pranks do not get too mean or actually damage the canon.
Second, somewhat related, your writing style seems to be straddling the line between serious and comic. I really enjoyed the humor in the second prompt, but the Cafeteria scene had me a little worried when it came to the mentions of silverware embedded in the walls and frozen coffee spears. In a totally comic setting with totally comedic violence, it would probably be fine, but because I'm not entirely sure yet what tone you're going to settle into, those things seemed a little too dangerous to be funny. So, watch out for that sort of thing, too.
Those two things aside, I liked both prompts. The first one quickly drew me in and had me interested in the outcome, and the second one, as I said, was pretty funny. I loved "Coffee went boom!" Poor intern. {X D
Assuming you meant Erron and Mei by "both characters," I'd support putting Sylendre in Floaters, once she's been trained up a bit. The more agents on a team, the longer the mission gets to give everyone enough screen time, so keeping it to two most of the time is a good idea. Having her still share their RC might be interesting, though.
(BTW, how is "Sylendre" pronounced? My brain wants to make it like "cylinder.")
I'd normally advise avoiding anything remotely connected to a Legendary Badfic for an early mission, but seeing as you've got your self-sporking lined up first, and "Im Not Okay" doesn't really look that dire, you may well take it in stride. I'm willing to find out.
So, with that, Permission Granted!
~Neshomeh -
Congratulations! by
on 2018-01-02 14:01:00 UTC
Link to this
Take the Iron Spork. You've earned it
-
Thanks! by
on 2018-01-02 02:13:00 UTC
Link to this
A lot of my writing style is from a more serious, RP writing past, I hope to shake that off by the end of my first full mission.
You're close on Sylendre's name. "SIGH-len-dra". -
Congrats! *tosses Spikes* (nm) by
on 2018-01-02 02:00:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Congratulations. by
on 2018-01-01 21:18:00 UTC
Link to this
Let me give you this self-updating guidebook of all the deathtraps in the multiverse, Pasty.
May your cowrite be long and lively and your characters go through interesting times. -
*cakefetti* Congrats! (nm) by
on 2018-01-01 20:30:00 UTC
Link to this
-
For clarity: by
on 2018-01-01 12:35:00 UTC
Link to this
I beta'd the entire Permission document once, suggesting several changes. I didn't take a second look after those changes were made (I don't remember whether Pasty Greens didn't let me know they were updated, or whether I just spaced it).
hS -
Thank you! by
on 2018-01-02 02:00:00 UTC
Link to this
I'll do my best not to disappoint!
-
PPC interlude plug (Scape, you should read this.) by
on 2018-01-02 20:57:00 UTC
Link to this
A short story put together over the holidays; I literally can't say any more:
Restricted
~
And while I'm here... a couple of Christmas present pics:
'Ook', says the Eagle.
Kaitlyn and I have decided this is Elberath, her mini, rather than one of my two. ^_^ I'm fine with that. Angling to get her put on top of the tree next year.
hS -
Re: interlude (spoilers) by
on 2018-01-10 18:50:00 UTC
Link to this
It's definitely cool to learn anything new about the Canon Librarian. I love the little glimpse we've gotten into his "nest," as well as some more vague hints at his physical presence.
The mood throughout this piece is great. I love that is keeps ramping up a more and more sinister feeling of foreboding, only to pull the rug out from under us in the last paragraphs and turn it very sentimental and reverent of Scape's work. Very nicely done!
The fact that the Canon Librarian seems to know what World One authors are writing for the PPC has intersting implications, especially considering he himself clearly isn't from World One . . . I must ask, though: what are The Everbright Glede, The Magical Adventures of Ladies and Gentlemen and The Kraken-Knights of Wintertide? I can't find mention of them online anywhere. They're not in the "PPC authors" cupboard, but they're in the same safe as that cupboard. What's the significance of those titles?
—doctorlit still wants to buy a copy of that book, Scapegrace! -
:D Thank you! by
on 2018-01-11 14:47:00 UTC
Link to this
As Scapegrace says, the 'slightly less restricted' books are PPCers' NaNos. Kraken-Knights is mine, Magical Adventures is by BeautyID and is the best thing ever, and Glede is an Alec Troven book by kippur which had a cool, eye-catching title.
hS -
I can answer that last one! by
on 2018-01-11 06:43:00 UTC
Link to this
At least in the case of that last one, it's a NaNoWriMo project of hS's. Go read it on his LiveJournal before the KGB requisition it, it's pretty good. =]
As for the book, I'm gonna sort that out in a bit. =] -
I liked. Well-written. Cool presents. Low on thoughts. (nm) by
on 2018-01-04 14:56:00 UTC
Link to this
-
!!! by
on 2018-01-03 01:31:00 UTC
Link to this
Is this my first fanfic? I'm claiming it as my first fanfic. =]
Thank you for writing this. It's fascinating to look at the Canon Library, and a privilege to be part of the Restricted Section. I hope the unknowable entity that goes by the Canon Librarian enjoys Anomalies. =] -
That was really sweet. :) by
on 2018-01-02 21:02:00 UTC
Link to this
I approve greatly of buttons, and fandom tree toppers. We just packed our Weeping Angel away today.
-
New Guy by
on 2018-01-03 00:44:00 UTC
Link to this
I have read PPC 'fics for several years, but this is my first post here on the board.
I come here with an offering of a randomly generated Harry Potter chapter:
http://botnik.org/content/harry-potter.html -
Belated welcome aBoard! by
on 2018-01-08 17:52:00 UTC
Link to this
Have one of my own shed feathers, plus a working replica of the Golden Snitch with a Pokeball engraving!
-
Hallo! by
on 2018-01-08 03:19:00 UTC
Link to this
Take a flask of mjød, and a book from the Library of Prospero. Although be sure to have it back in before... oh. Nevermind.
Apologies for not greeting you earlier, but... well, y'know. Anyways, I'm Thoth, Almighty Sorcerer, and Crazy Liar. I'm not a Space Marine, but I play one on TV.
You seem cool, so be sure to pop by the Discord if you're feeling it, and just... generally have fun, even if you don't take me up on that. -
Eyyyyy newbie! by
on 2018-01-06 18:56:00 UTC
Link to this
Haha, we were talking about that chapter a while ago! I've even tried the Botnik writer myself, and it was... interesting.
Anyway, nice to meet you! I'm Twistey, an amateur creator who can't decide which medium to stick to, partially thanks to the 4 years that Scratch.mit.edu had me brainwashed into thinking that the site and its community was the center of the universe, leaving me with the idea that I can program my own games and yeah it's totally fine to program with colored blocks. (But hey, at least Stencyl is a step up. If I try I'll get somewhere.) I'm pretty active on here.
Enough about me, how about you? What are your fandoms? How did you discover the PPC, and what type of stuff do you plan to write for it? Any character ideas? Anything interesting you've already written? I'd love to know more!
Finally, for your newbie gift, here's a copy of a very strange story. From what I'd guess, it seems to be an outsider's misinterpretation of the Original Series. Not that they have any reason to, other than Wikia's adblock ban. If you stick around long enough, I'll inform you of its exact contents.
Nice to meet you! I hope you have a wonderful time here and welcome to the PPC!
-Twistey -
Re: Eyyyyy newbie! by
on 2018-01-07 03:51:00 UTC
Link to this
I enjoy the Harry Potter series, also Warhammer 40,000, Andrzej Sapkowski's The Witcher series, and various other things. I discovered the PPC via Television Tropes and Idioms (tvtropes), and I hope to write PPC missions using agents Colonel Caleb Bradbury (a retired Argentinian army officer from world 1.567 repeating), and Rasputin Gibbs ( reptilian humanoid from world 1.963, where most conspiracy theories are true). My writing credentials include two completed National Novel Writing Months, and various short stories. I look forward to aiding in the fight against badfic.
-
Alrighty! Hey, have you met Thoth? by
on 2018-01-11 23:59:00 UTC
Link to this
Thoth is another PPCer who is into Warhammer 40K. He's a pretty good dude, and is active frequently here. He also has a friend he recruited called Grundleplith The Dorf, but the latter doesn't seem to have been active lately.
Huh, you seem to have a good deal of stuff figured out. I'll leave this to you, then.
-Twistey -
Re: Alrighty! Hey, have you met Thoth? by
on 2018-01-20 02:25:00 UTC
Link to this
Duly noted.
-
Hello! by
on 2018-01-03 04:49:00 UTC
Link to this
I am also new - arguably more so than you since I only learned about all this stuff recently - but it's great to meet you! My gift to you is a spoonful of crystallized honey, with the hope that something long neglected in the darkness of a back cabinet and only now lifted back to the light can still bring sweetness into the world.
-
Hey! Welcome! by
on 2018-01-03 02:34:00 UTC
Link to this
It's nice to meet you, newbie! Thanks for the gift; it's greatly appreciated. In return, I offer you a Generic Weapon of any type you want. I'd advise you to check out the Constitution if you haven't already. In the meantime, tell us about yourself! Who are you? What are your likes? Dislikes? What fandoms are you in? What stories do you read? What type of writing do you do, if any? We look forward to getting to know you. :)
-
Re: Hey! Welcome! by
on 2018-01-03 02:56:00 UTC
Link to this
Thanks, I've read the Constitution, and I shall introduce myself. I have some knowledge of many popular canons, and the three things I like the most are John Hodgman's Complete World Knowledge trilogy, Warhammer 40,000, and the short stories of Argentinian magical realist and knife-fighting enthusiast Jorge Luis Borges. Outside of those I have eclectic tastes in music, from heavy metal (mostly Powerwolf, Sabaton, and Tool), to opera of the romantic era (I have listened mostly to the works Wagner and Stravisky). To be honest, eclectic describes most of my tastes.
-
apology by
on 2018-01-03 02:57:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm sorry for not putting my name on the last one, though I probably don't need to be.
-
Happy Birthday, Mr. Tolkien! (nm) by
on 2018-01-03 09:25:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I'm late, but yay! (nm) by
on 2018-01-06 17:41:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Happy Birthday! (nm) by
on 2018-01-03 21:37:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Pluggage by a passerby (Blank Sprite chapter 11). by
on 2018-01-04 14:26:00 UTC
Link to this
https://rc1587.wordpress.com/2018/01/04/blank-sprite-mission-record-11/
In which Sergio faces off his evil clone for the last time, and the group gets unexpected support from Sergio's former employer. -
I'm liking it! /thumbs up by
on 2018-01-05 15:50:00 UTC
Link to this
Nice 007 shout-out, too.
Loving Corolla's lines, especially. "Great, we've got two of them now."
/Sends Good Vibes your way!
-
Regarding Mr Sprinkles by
on 2018-01-05 01:31:00 UTC
Link to this
Last night, Mr Sprinkles asked me in PM on Discord whether people would be okay with him returning to the PPC Discord.
To those who do not know, since he joined, Mr Sprinkles was very active on the Discord, and, in my opinion, a great member of the PPC. On New Year's Eve, he had what appears to be a major meltdown, and said several things I'd prefer not to repeat here, that generally boiled down to "You don't matter to me.", "My existence is meaningless.", "You don't know the real me." and "You are lying when you say that you care about me.". The meltdown ended with him leaving the server on his own (He was not kicked as far as I know). After a while, he apparently asked Cal via PM to pass on his apology and that he was feeling slightly better, which she did.
Mr Sprinkles came back a few hours later for a short period of time, to positive reactions from those who were online at the time. He again apologized for what had happened, and left again shortly after, due to needing a break from the PPC after what had happened.
Yesterday evening, he asked me whether I would be willing to poke the server about whether people would be okay with him coming back. I did so, and the initial reaction was positive, until Ix objected, without declaring any reasoon for doing so. After that the chat dissolved into discussion, and due to the issue being serious, and the suggestions of some people in the chat, I'm bringing the issue to the Board.
My personal opinion: In the PMs with me, Sprinkle has apologized multiple times over, and (as far as I can tell) deeply regrets what happened. From what he told me it also transpired that he apparently was not entirely in control of his actions at the time, which he described to me in later PMs as feeling like "a forced shift in personality" and an "alternate personality forcibly taking over".
I'd be happy to have him back anytime.
~Ak
PS: Something important to note is that he was never banned,and that to my knowledge noone even publicly proposed any kind of ban against him. -
A little encouragement for us all. by
on 2018-01-06 23:54:00 UTC
Link to this
I was telling an outside friend of mine about this situation, and she shared with me the story of the butterfly's struggle, which I thought was very uplifting. I realize it may not be the right message for everyone at all times, but as we individually and collectively struggle with our various challenges, I hope it's because we're empowering our wings to fly.
There are several versions of the butterfly story out there; this is a link to the one at the top of my Google hits:
http://instructor.mstc.edu/instructor/swallerm/Struggle%20-%20Butterfly.htm
~Neshomeh -
An additional perspective by
on 2018-01-06 23:07:00 UTC
Link to this
I realize this issue is rather moot now, but I still feel this should be added.
Yesterday, I had it pointed out to me that as a result of some circumstances that have/are hurt(ing) him, Sprinkles has been infected with (this is the best verb I can think of here) certain persistent patterns of behavior and conversation style that, in the aggregate, would (in the judgement of the person explaining this) almost surely cause something like this incident to reoccur if Sprinkles came into contact with other vulnerable people similar to X (the victim currently at issue). That is, there is very good reason to believe this issue would not be an isolated incident.
It was further pointed out to me that this was something that would be quite resolvable with some help, but that because of some circumstances Sprinkles is in, he wouldn't be in a position to receive such help at or near this time. This concern for X and other people that would be drawn into similar situations make the person I was talking to uncomfortable with having Sprinkles in the PPC Discord.
I'd like to reiterate that this doesn't make Sprinkles a bad person or anything like that. I hope Sprinkles can get away from the circumstances that are causing and prolonging this issue and get help and healing.
I have somewhat lower estimates of the probability of recurrence than the person who explained this to me did. However, I know basically nothing about this type of issue. In light of this information, I find myself rather unsure that my proposed solution would have actually solved anything. I am also, however, not entirely convinced that making Sprinkles leave under these circumstances would have been a precedent we would want to set.
I just don't know what we should have done anymore. I thought I had a good idea. It turns out that may not have been the case. So, even though we are not deciding on anything anymore, I (entirely symbolically) abstain.
- Tomash -
Closing thoughts by
on 2018-01-06 02:43:00 UTC
Link to this
Whether or not this continues, which I sincerely hope it doesn't, I am backing out of it. All of it. Having been involved with both concerned parties for a notable length of time, I am personally shattered that it ever came to this. I think I'm still in denial of what's happening; what I saw during the previous months is so starkly different from what's gone on the past few days, I can scarcely believe this is real. For that matter, I am deeply sorry. I'm sorry that this happened in the first place and I'm sorry for any and all pain I caused during this argument. If I've wronged you in any way, I acknowledge it and I apologize with all the sincerity I can muster. I feel as though I have lost my family over the course of this discussion and nothing about what seems to be the final assessment sits well with me, but it's apparently not my place to say. I'm not in possession of the full facts and I'm honestly not qualified to be here, making judgements. I am sorry for my hurtful words, I am sorry for overstepping my bounds, and I am sorry that I can't agree with most/many of you. I hope that in time, we can all recover from this, and that someday I'll be able to wash the bitter taste from the back of my throat. But for the time being, I need both time and space, so this is my goodbye.
-
Lets stop this by
on 2018-01-06 02:10:00 UTC
Link to this
This is doing more harm than good. A lot of hurtful things have been said here, and it's putting everyone through hell.
I'm not trying to gain sympathy points by saying this- Y'all can believe what you want about me, but I don't want more people to get hurt. I just want this fighting to stop. And, if it means I'm not allowed back into the PPC, then that's fine by me.
I make my apologies, and I'll keep my distance.
Goodbye, it was awesome meeting you guys. -
Time to weigh in. by
on 2018-01-05 22:09:00 UTC
Link to this
Okay, now that I've read everything people have posted, I have to say I don't support the idea of Sprinkles coming back into the chat at this time for a few reasons which I'll lay out. Let me say something that's been said many times before by other people, but bears mentioning again: Sprinkles, I hope you get the support and help you need. I don't think you're a bad person; I just think the best thing for everyone would be to take a break for a while.
Now, as to why.
As I see it, Sprinkles has been abusing at least one person for an extended period of time, and that person reached out to others for help before deciding to block Sprinkles. I don't think Tomash's proposal is realistic precisely *because* it's ideal. People are not ideal. People make mistakes. I think it's likely that some kind of accidental interaction between Sprinkles and Person X will happen, and that that interaction could be harmful to at least one of them, to say nothing of the rest of the community as a whole if it happens outside PMs. Tomash has a good proposal, I just think it's not likely to be followed even if everyone has the very best of intentions (and I'm not saying anyone doesn't).
Now, I haven't been in contact with Sprinkles. I don't know his exact situation or what steps he's taking in real life. I don't know who Person X is, so I can't speak for them. Maybe other people know more and haven't said anything yet that could change my mind, and if that's the case (and people are comfortable sharing), I'd appreciate hearing it. Unless and until that happens, though? The safest option for both Sprinkles and Person X is for Sprinkles to cut contact through the PPC Discord.
What happens in PMs between Sprinkles and other people in the PPC is outside what I'm willing to talk about. I'm only suggesting he be asked politely but firmly to stay off the PPC Discord server for at least a few months... and most importantly, we should defer to Person X as for when (or even if) to let Sprinkles back in. -
My updated thoughts on the matter by
on 2018-01-05 19:58:00 UTC
Link to this
When I wrote the above post, I only knew Sprinkle's side of the story. I was not aware of the extent of the abuse, to the point where the interactions between Sprinkle and the victim that I was aware of did not even register as abuse to me, or the extent of the distress it caused them. Had I known about it, I would have featured it in the post; however I fully understand the victim's decision not to share it with me. I did attempt to contact the victim; both to try and set up a discussion between them and Sprinkle, and to find out their side of the story. They refused, a decision that I do not blame them for in the slightest. At that time however, I attempted to get their story even after they told me to drop the subject. I have already apologized to them in private, but that happened before I brought the discussion to the Board. Due to what I learned from this discussion, I think a second apology is in order. I am sorry for not respecting the victim's wish not to discuss the matter. I fully understand their decision not to, and should not have pressed the topic.
As to what happened, I do share the opinion that Sprinkle did not intentionally inflict abuse on the victim. I also think that shutting of Sprinkle was a good decision, or at least better than keeping up the abusive relationship. Was it the best option there was? I have honestly no idea. I think things might have turned out better in the aftermath if they had maybe asked someone they trusted to explain the situation to Sprinkle. However, I do not blame them for not doing so, and I am not sure if I would have done it if I had been in their situation.
Maxe's idea of a moderated discussion sounds like a good idea in theory, but, as they admit themselves, it is not practical in this case, and trying force both parties into it would be a horrible idea.
I support Sprinkle being allowed back, however I also think Tomash's proposal, possibly with a few tweaks and clarifications, is a good idea, but I'd be interested in hearing the victim's thoughts on it if they are willing to voice them, either themselves or through Delta.
One final note to everyone: There is something important to learn from this situation for everyone who offers emotional support to others. First, what you're doing is admirable. But you must never forget to take care of yourselves. Back in EMT training, we learned a principle that roughly translates to "Make sure you are safe before attempting to save others." It was mostly meant as a warning to look out for possible dangers and not to take unnecessarily risky actions. I don't want to say"Don't help others if you have mental health Issues yourself", in a lot of cases having experience with mental illnesses can be very helpful. I want to say that your own wellbeing is important as well. (Again, this is *not* intended as an attack on the victim, but as an important warning to others).
~Ak -
My thoughts by
on 2018-01-05 16:50:00 UTC
Link to this
This is a multifaceted issue and I don't know if I can really lay all my support onto a single person here.
Not all the parties involved are talking about this. And it is more people like Nesh who weren't present in this should be speaking up, because though this (the lashout from Sprinkles in the main discord) was somewhat of an isolated event, the more people who can talk about it, the more fleshed out and more understood a situation will be.
I do support that this was a mental issue, being that there was a trigger involved! In the moments directly before the lashout Sprinkles was talking about how his biological brother was harassing and threatening him. This is something that can cause trauma, if it happens often.
I'm also assuming that all the other times where he lashed out to his victim that it was also caused by something.
But even if it was caused by something else does it excuse him lashing out to the chat? I mean, given that he had no control over his emotional and mental state I'd say that it does, but there's always the option of not even looking at the chat at all and not communicating. I was a large part in the discussion and I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that Sprinkles was going on a downswing and from the way he was talking it sounded very similar to the times in which I myself felt like killing myself, and I tried to draw away from that as much as possible. I suppose if I hadn't been there and kept disagreeing with him and attempting to get him to see the brightness of life and the good that the lashout would have been much shorter. Was it wrong of me in that case to step in? Maybe so, maybe not. I don't know how things would have turned out if I hadn't.
But, this was not the only lashout, and this is why I am having trouble forming a solid opinion. There was a singular person, who tried to handle it all. Who took much more of what Sprinkles said and was not equipped to handle it. I don't believe Sprinkles understood what he was doing to the person. I think that based on the reactions that he's mentioned that he was under the impression that things were going ok, because they were helping him, and he was unaware that he had inadvertently become abusive towards them. The person directly contacted me and asked me to help them out with the downswings. I tried to give as best moral support as I could. They asked me to talk to Sprinkles about this so they wouldn't have to deal with it all by themselves. But I took a stance that if I actually tried to talk to Sprinkles about it that it would destroy his trust in both of ours, something that I didn't want to be lost, because I believed that the damage of me directly talking to him about what he was saying would cause him to turn away from the entire community. In hindsight, I would have taken more responsibility and metaphorically tried to take Sprinkles off them. But everything is clearer in hindsight, and I can't change those events now.
I want Sprinkles and the person to work it out, in a moderated discussion. I don't see that happening any time soon.
I'm still not entirely sure where I stand on this. I'm for Sprinkles staying in the PPC. I'm for the victim speaking about this, whether directly or relayed through Delta (speaking of, Delta, you're incredibly kind and thoughtful for doing so). -
I don't think I can contribute much to this, but by
on 2018-01-05 15:16:00 UTC
Link to this
I do want to throw in my general support for Delta Juliette, Matt Cipher, hS, and basically everyone begging us all to remember the anonymous person and take them seriously. The lone voice daring to speak out against abuse must not be dismissed simply because they are in the minority and the person who has hurt them is otherwise well-respected. As the world at large is coming to realize, that is wrong and cannot continue. Being in the minority and in a position of less power does not make them incorrect.
That said, I get that this is not a simple, clear-cut situation, and I am proud of everyone for not being so blindly committed to one person or the other that they can't see both sides. This is hard, and I think you're all doing an admirable job of navigating through it. I know you'll make the best decision you can.
~Neshomeh -
Honest Opinion on the entire Issue by
on 2018-01-05 12:59:00 UTC
Link to this
It's probably unwise to type this literally minutes before work... Then again, people who are in a rush tend to write what's on their mind, without taking time to sound more neutral or PC. So here goes:
Sprinkles is not a bad guy. That has to be established first. He's a bloke with problems, just like many of us. I have no details about his life situation, but suffice to say it's not easy. He deals with his problems, and I believe that being among the PPC people kinda helped him in that matter. It's no longer a question of whether or not he should be invited back to the Discord, because he was never kicked off of it.
Now, for the bigger issue. Is Sprinkles an abuser? Yes. Yes, he is. HOWEVER, this is not a type of abuse that he chooses to inflict. He does not pick up his victims and pretends to be this poor, unfortunate, soul only to take pleasure in their suffering. He does not do this consciously. If we take into consideration what he claims being "another personality taking over", maybe it's a type of schizophrenia? I have no idea, and I don't know if Sprinkles had done anything to treat it. Nonetheless, it IS an abuse, and nothing that his victims do is their fault.
Once again, I will give you an compilation of what happened that time at Discord. This is but a few of the messages displayed in public. Please look at some of the words. "I'll hurt you". "I'll make you hate me". "Stop lying". Now, who can honestly say that they would be okay with getting things like this? Do you truly believe Sprinkles's victim was FINE with getting borderline THREATS for over a month? And then, after they've finally decided this has to stop, and chose the safest possible way of finishing it, you guys dare saying "Oh, they should've just tell Sprinkles and not make a big fuss about it." NO. Hell to the n, to the o! Why? Because Sprinkles clearly had no control over his abusive self. Telling him to stop wouldn't do anything, because it's not this side of him performing the abuse.
And yes, I said "safest" possible way out was going completely cold. Why? Well, imagine this - you suffer an abuse, from a person you care about and do their absolute best to keep sane. You bottle up all your emotion, so they finally burst like a Mentos+Cola combination. What good would saying "Yeah, he abused me emotionally" do? It would only create a situation of "How dare you accusing him!", "Booo! Attention beggar!", "He has problems! It's your job to help him!". It would definitely turn into a victim blaming scenario. One we don't need here anymore.
Final thoughts? I have no problems with Sprinkles coming to Discord. It seems like he has now a few more people to talk to, maybe this will help him. But he has to respect his victim's wish and now interact with them, until they decide it's okay. Because this was a strained relationship for both of them. They need a break from one another. -
Erm... I totally agree! (nm) by
on 2018-01-05 13:08:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Attempted summary and community-side proposal by
on 2018-01-05 10:03:00 UTC
Link to this
So, per downthread:
- Sprinkles has made a person/multiple people uncomfortable by behaving abusively in PMs.
- There is a person, let's call them X, that Sprinkles has been acting abusively towards in PMs for months.
- Because of said behavior, X has, for a good while, been uncomfortable with/afraid to/unwilling to/... with:
a) Sprinkles's behavior
b) Telling Sprinkles to stop
c) Reporting this
- It is unclear whether or not Sprinkles was aware of the impact his behavior was having before the block/this thread.
- Recently (after Sprinkles's rant), X blocked Sprinkles.
- After said block, Sprinkles has been attempting to (directly and/or indirectly) apologize and resume contact with X, in a manner that constitutes harassment.
- X continues to be unwilling to publicize their identity or speak up for themselves, and Delta has been advocating for them.
My thoughts:
It is unclear whether or not Sprinkles's behavior before the block is something we can/should do anything to address in an Official Community Action way. It was, to be clear, a bad thing, though.
However, recent events are (again, if past events were also this, we should be informed, as that changes a lot of things) something that is much less ambiguous: a harassment issue. X does not want to hear from Sprinkles, either ever again or for a good long while, and Sprinkles has been very much not respecting that (or at least, that's been implied downthread). For example, by bugging multiple people to try and get his apologies passed on to X.
This behavior is unambiguously (aka there is not a "Oh I had no idea I was being harassing." defense to this part) Not OK.
The question then arises: what do we do about it?
I have a proposal. I don't know if this is a feasible proposal, and I don't know if it'll work for X.
- Before readmission to chat, Sprinkles needs to stop harassing X (and any other relevant people) and fully apologize for doing so
- Sprinkles needs to respect the spirit of the block once he's back in chat. That is, he should act as if X doesn't exist. No mentioning them, no alluding to them, etc etc. (It'd probably be fine for them to both talk about something, but they should not talk to each other.
- A corollary to this is that X should also avoid interacting with Sprinkles. However, the burden of avoiding interaction is on Sprinkles, not X. It's Sprinkles's job to stay away from X, not the other way around.
- Voip makes this type of restriction complicated, especially since the situation as it stands would have X being unable to join voip if Sprinkles happens to be there. Thoughts?
- Violation of the spirit of the block, is, at the determination of the mods, a kick and some (not permanent the first time around, probably) ban from chat.
- Continued harassment is a nice enforced vacation from the PPC. That's how we've dealt with this before.
Again, I don't know if this is going to help any, because I really don't know much about how abusive situations work or what should be done in response.
I would appreciate comments and feedback on this attempted compromise resolution.
- Tomash -
A suggestion by
on 2018-01-05 12:30:00 UTC
Link to this
I propose a slightly more relaxed restriction, Tomash. Partly because it solves the VoIP issue, partly because I just think it's a better solution.
-Sprinkles should not try to force a discussion with the individual in question, or seek out contact with them.
-HOWEVER, if that individual is in a discussion that Sprinkles is also in and wishes to join, Sprinkles may respond to their comments in said discussion. The same goes for the individual.
-If, through any means, the topic of discussion becomes the issues between Sprinkles and the individual, then Sprinkles must exit the conversation unless the individual explicitly states otherwise.
-In VoIP, the same rules apply: Sprinkles may join in discussion that involves the individual, but may not seek them out, and may not broach this subject.
Does this seem reasonable? If it doesn't, we can go for Tomash's original, but I do feel this laxer allows both Sprinkles and the individual more flexibility, and a more sane ability operate in a shared space. I have been known to be wrong, however, and if others feel Tomash's proposal seems stronger, I can deal with that. -
Re: A suggestion by
on 2018-01-05 16:31:00 UTC
Link to this
Having read through all that has been posted on this site regarding this issues as of this moment, I do believe this is the best solution. We don't yet know if this will be a habit, so we should work under the assumption that it is a one time thing. I think that right now, this is the best option, especially given the fact that there appears to be precedent for this happening given what Huinesoron said.
-
Be aware... by
on 2018-01-05 16:37:00 UTC
Link to this
... that for at least one person, this was not just a one-time thing. The question as I understand it is whether it can cease to be a thing.
~Neshomeh -
Some more points by
on 2018-01-05 13:10:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm not sure that "the issues between them" is a restriction that will cover anything that's actually a problem. From what I can tell, the issue is Sprinkles going on the sort of rant we saw in chat a few days back, just over and over in PMs, to the point that X (who had been trying to help that whole time) eventually snapped and had enough.
Now, there doesn't seem to be anything in that above paragraph warranting an immediate hurling out the door. However, if we're looking at levels of rant etc. that are objectively unreasonable, that is, Sprinkles should've known that was too much to pin on someone (it's currently unclear if that's the case, for one, no logs), someone should mention this.
Therefore, as an amendment to the previous proposal, Sprinkles needs to also not do the insulting rant thing he did to chat a few days ago, privately or otherwise, probably on pain of temp-boot. (If nothing else, it avoids re-exposing X to that.).
If Sprinkles can't control that behavior ... I don't know. I can very much understand why many people are uncomfortable having someone who'll tend to do that to people in the chat though.
Referring to elsewhere in the thread, I predict that if that kept happening in chat, I'd be feeling really nice/sympathetic/... and likely wouldn't be calling for boots, even though they'd be needed to preserve the utility of the chat for everyone else. I have the feeling this is the position X is in at the moment.
*sighs* This is hard.
- Tomash -
Aaaaand pause. by
on 2018-01-05 13:38:00 UTC
Link to this
Therefore, as an amendment to the previous proposal, Sprinkles needs to also not do the insulting rant thing he did to chat a few days ago, privately or otherwise, probably on pain of temp-boot. (If nothing else, it avoids re-exposing X to that.).
I will remind you that less than a year ago, we had someone post rants to the Board and the Discord while influenced by mental health issues. Do you feel that that person should be booted from the Discord if it happens again? I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess not.
There are two (three) entirely separate issues here:
Does having mental-health-issue-induced breakdowns render you ineligible to participate in the PPC?
I would say no.
Is anyone required to put their own mental wellbeing at risk to preserve the wellbeing of another, eg by continuing a relationship that they feel is abusive towards them?
I would say no.
Is 'preserving the utility of the chat' a more important goal than allowing PPC members in good standing access to said chat?
I would say no.
hS -
Yeah, that was too harsh by
on 2018-01-05 14:16:00 UTC
Link to this
I mostly agree with your positions. That amendment is the sort of attitude we've decided we don't want to have, and so I'm taking it back.
That being said, I'd like your thoughts on something. Suppose hypothetically that the sort of repeated breakdown we're hearing about in this thread were directed at the chat as a whole and not a specific member. Would you support a collective "enough is enough" at some point? (To be clear, I don't think another breakdown would make us hit that point, but I do think such a point exists.)
- Tomash, on mobile -
Look at Zdimensia. by
on 2018-01-05 14:52:00 UTC
Link to this
Back when people thought she might still be operating in good faith, she was repeatedly given a message along the lines of: we're sorry you have mental health issues that render you unable to communicate civilly. Since the PPC is aggravating that problem, for your own good you should probably leave.
That's a message I could see being given. But an ultimatum - a gods, your issues are so irritating, get lost - would absolutely not be.
hS -
Re: Zdimensia by
on 2018-01-05 22:17:00 UTC
Link to this
The way I see it, a large part of why we eventually banned Zdimensia for good is that she was stomping on our collective boundaries (insulting a whole lot of people, trying to dictate the terms of her relationship with the community etc etc.) and didn't stop after we'd explained the problem and given her a chance to work on it/stop.
I'm willing to say that Zdimentia was actually trying to participate and ... couldn't. So we had to cut off our relationship with her for our own well-being.
The ultimatum as you phrased it wouldn't be OK, but we're sorry, your issues are making this place unsafe/[are effectively abusive behavior towards the community]/.... and they don't seem to be improving, you'll need to leave is something we've said before (IMO) and that we hopefully won't need to say again. (That being said, some sort of warning between "please stop" and that sort of thing might be a good idea if we somehow end up in that point.)
- Tomash -
This might be the best option. I support it. (nm) by
on 2018-01-05 10:09:00 UTC
Link to this
-
My thoughts. by
on 2018-01-05 03:13:00 UTC
Link to this
Although I admit my perspective is limited, I would be willing to let him back into the Discord channel.
Firstly, the purely technical. He was not, at any point, actually kicked. He left of his own accord, and in this particular case, I don't feel the situation warrants a ban. While my memory is horribly faulty, I don't recall anything like a warning before the incident that would create reason for what would amount to a ban.
Secondly, since the event, he has been nothing but apologetic, to myself and to others. Given the mental circumstances around the incident, and things I've been told since then, I believe that a repeated occurrence would be unlikely. Therefore, I'd be willing to have him back. -
I'm willing to have him back... by
on 2018-01-05 02:47:00 UTC
Link to this
But I do think that he seriously needs to get help with his issues, assuming he hasn't already. (He probably has, but... I don't know. Sprinkles?)
-
Okay... by
on 2018-01-05 02:04:00 UTC
Link to this
I am writing this from my phone, so please excuse the brevity and inevitable typos- I will spend more time once I have my full keyboard again.
If it was just the New Year's Eve meltdown? I'd be right there with you. He posted in the middle of a meltdown, didn't even attack anyone in particular, and has apologized to at least Akrinor. I'd be cool with a "don't do that again," and probably some talk via pms on how to recognize when he shouldn't be posting.
But.
I've heard from a member of the community who offered to help Sprinkles that he has been throwing significant amounts of abuse at them in PM for multiple months, to the point that they've suffered a lot of distress. I've also heard corroboration from other people- I really trust what I've heard about Sprinkles's behavior.
I'm sorry I'm being vague- some of the people I am talking to are not comfortable being named in this conversation, and I'm trying to respect that. I'm also not sure how much their identities matter- Sprinkles has been taking out his issues on people in painful ways, and I'm not comfortable with that in my community.
At this point, I'd like to ((say something here that I've rightly been called out for. Removed it.))
To add to that- I do not intend to block him from contacting me. But, that does not mean I am comfortable having him in a space where he has already made people uncomfortable speaking up about how he is hurting them. -
All I want to say is, I'm standing with DJ on this one. (nm) by
on 2018-01-05 08:51:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Addendum: To anyone who claims... by
on 2018-01-05 09:51:00 UTC
Link to this
That the victim of abuse should absolutely forgive and accept Other!Sprinkles (because for me it's evident there is some sort of problem going, and he wishes to call it a "forced shift of personality") back as their friend, here's a little compilation of what went down in the main Discord chat. I only blurted out the names of called-out PPC-ers. Pay attention especially to messages number 2, 6, 7, and 9.
https://imgur.com/a/JWJhQ
Now imagine this being sent to you privately over, and over, and over, and over, and over... and you not saying a single bad word to the abuser about this. I admire the victim for being patient for so long. -
Whoa... by
on 2018-01-05 02:45:00 UTC
Link to this
Okay, I can't make a judgement about this. I don't know anything. I don't know if the individual in question informed Sprinkles that what he was doing made them uncomfortable (that's important: there's a difference between not knowing that you're bothering someone, and knowing but doing it anyways). I don't even know what he did.
I understand that you cannot reasonably give us that information, but it does mean that I can't do much with what you gave me.
I have to judge Sprinkles on my observations of his behavior, and on what I know. And for the most part, he's been a very good member of the PPC community from what I have seen. I think he has some issues (Sprinkles, I assume you're reading this... Please, get some help if you haven't already. I don't know how capable you are of getting help, but if you can, you need to), but fundamentally, his heart is in the right place, and he's mostly a great guy.
If I knew what happened in PMs, that may change my opinion. I don't know. But a vague charge that he did something in PMs with no indication that there are not other options aside from booting him to mitigate this (like, say, talking to Sprinkles and sorting it out) doesn't change my position. Booting, even from chat, is a fairly extreme action.
Finally, there's something about Delta's post that really bugged me: It's the link to the Missing Stairs post. Delta, I feel that providing that post in the context you did severely overstates Sprinkles' issues. Not only that, but as posted, it seems to indirectly compare Sprinkles to a rapist. Sprinkles is by no means a perfect human being, but the issues we are discussing are not anywhere near that serious. That link makes it seem like you are implying that Sprinkles is Totally Broken, Evil, or both: neither is accurate, in my opinion.
I don't think that's what you meant to do by linking that post, but that is how it came across, to me at least. -
You're right, and I am sorry by
on 2018-01-05 03:05:00 UTC
Link to this
That link was inappropriate, and I appreciate being called out on it.
-
I feel that is an inappropriate example by
on 2018-01-05 02:37:00 UTC
Link to this
I think I get the gist of what you're trying to say here, but that's a bit much, don't you think? Sprinkles is a good friend of mine and a good person. I along with several other people heavily disapprove of comparing him to a freaking criminal.
-
... by
on 2018-01-05 02:58:00 UTC
Link to this
No matter what the circumstances, in my mind? That just wasn't okay. On any level.
-
I agree, but- by
on 2018-01-05 02:50:00 UTC
Link to this
Yeah, it's more than a bit much. It's a solidly extreme example, and I only linked it because Clif explains it better than I could with half-frozen fingers on a phone keyboard. I am sorry for the implications it raised.
-
Ninja. I agree. (nm) by
on 2018-01-05 02:45:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Seconded. by
on 2018-01-05 02:43:00 UTC
Link to this
I get that you're on phone and can't keep up otherwise. But still... I think this is a magnitude or more away from rape.
-
Interjection? by
on 2018-01-05 02:10:00 UTC
Link to this
I know who it is that was having this abuse flung at them. And e kept telling Sprinkles he was okay. There is no doubt in my mind that Sprinkles would have stopped if asked to - he's since offered several times with me.
-
Here's the thing... Human psyche is fragile by
on 2018-01-05 09:22:00 UTC
Link to this
And said person always thinks more of others than about themselves. Of course they would tell Sprinkles everything was okay, even if they were in a burning building. As long as he doesn't come over to burn, too.
The thing is, if they were getting this much abuse and verbal punching every other day, like what we've got in the chat... I can't do anything else but to agree with them. And I personally doubt Sprinkles would stop mid-rant. He had no control over his words last time. Not because he's a bad person, but because that's how it goes.
There's no doubt about him regretting his actions, but... I'd say, for the time being, it's not gonna help. And I know this better than anyone; big wounds and emotional pain takes more than just a day of two and a boatload of apologies. Said person will not forgive him and accept him in an instant, especially not since he's using proxies to convince said person to accept his apologies.
Pure and simple, and this is a message to Sprinkles as well: They don't want to hear from you. Give them time, maybe they'll decide they do. For now, you've caused too much pain to them to recognize you. You've apologized and that's the only thing you can do for now.
Man, that's one juicy hypocrisy coming from me... -
Um, no. by
on 2018-01-05 09:21:00 UTC
Link to this
Abuse isn't okay just because the victim didn't feel able to stand up for themselves.
And it's making me really uncomfortable that there are now at least three people insisting that it is.
hS -
Yes. But that's not exactly this. by
on 2018-01-05 12:10:00 UTC
Link to this
hS, I think you're missing some nuance here...
From what I understand, this wasn't so much Sprinkles abusing someone and them not telling him it wasn't okay, as it was Sprinkles talking and being told, REPEATEDLY, that it WAS OKAY and the person in question didn't mind.
I do not feel it is fair to lay the blame entirely on Sprinkles for that, as I would in a case of simple abuse. -
No, I'm not missing any nuance. by
on 2018-01-05 13:22:00 UTC
Link to this
Not feeling able to say anything other than "of course I don't mind you doing this" is a type of not feeling able to stand up for yourself. Implying otherwise is perilously close to saying 'they led Sprinkles on, they should have known better, they brought it on themselves'.
Imagine... oh, imagine a partner who doesn't want you to go out with friends, but insists that you stay home with them every evening. Do you really think that if you say 'of course that's okay, sweetheart' even though you'd actually like to get away from them for a while (and the weeks turn into months, and your friends no longer talk to you...), you're now complicit in their abuse?
Of course not. And when you turn that 'okay' from 'of course I love spending time with you' to 'of course you can say whatever you need to', it doesn't get any more acceptable to pin that on the victim.
hS -
Way to completely twist the meaning there, mate... by
on 2018-01-05 12:18:00 UTC
Link to this
From your message, it seems like the victim said that the abuse was okay. No. They've listened to Sprinkles, because they feel responsible for them. Because they care. Because they knew how is it to be in a dangerous family situation. But everything has limits. You were in the chat when the flood of emotion happened, some of which included insults and accusations of falsehood and lies. Getting that send to you over and over would break anyone.
-
From what I've heard... by
on 2018-01-05 12:34:00 UTC
Link to this
That's how it was perceived: Sprinkles was informed that what he was saying and doing was okay by the individual in question, and that they didn't mind hearing it.
That may not have been the intended message, but that the message it seems Sprinkles got. -
Once again by
on 2018-01-05 12:39:00 UTC
Link to this
A nice and kind person will never tell you to stop talking to them about your problems. They will listen and let you vent and even insult everything (including them), and calmly respond with positive messages. They will be worried that if they say anything other than a reassuring thought, they will make the matter even worse and will be perceived by others as selfish scum. EXACTLY, how the victim in question feels right now.
I know several people who are like this. This is why, if I talk my problems with them, I tend to apologize for rambling and taking their time. -
Sure. But... by
on 2018-01-05 13:03:00 UTC
Link to this
Can we then blame Sprinkles entirely?
He was repeatedly sent the message, deliberate or no, that what he did was okay. If you keep getting sent the message that the things you're saying are alright by the person you're talking to, then I can't blame you for thinking that.
I am not saying that Sprinkles bears no responsibility. I am not saying that the other individual is The Problem. I am saying that this is more complex then a simple case of abuse, and that it was a particularly nasty interaction between two flawed human beings, and I don't think we can reasonably simply assign blame to one or the other. -
Blame is hard. by
on 2018-01-05 17:00:00 UTC
Link to this
You're right, this is very much not a clear-cut case. If it was, the solution would be obvious. Just to reiterate, I don't think Sprinkles is Bad, or An Abuser, or someone who needs to be shunned- I think he's someone who has trouble seeing how his own behavior hits other people.
I also think that the PPC is likely to have more than one person who fits the anonymous victim's profile- wanting to help and with difficulty saying stop. That's why I'm not comfortable with Sprinkles returning- because I'm afraid that this will happen again, just as badly, without either party knowing how to stop it. -
I do know how it hits by
on 2018-01-05 18:45:00 UTC
Link to this
Delta, believe me, I know more than well how my behaviour can and does hurt other people.
That's why I always make sure the others are okay. That I give them good enough warning (with my triggers and any other issues that come up.)
I really hate it when anyone I know is hurt. It blows even more when it's because of me. -
Not everything needs blame. by
on 2018-01-05 17:08:00 UTC
Link to this
It is entirely possible to respect a victim's desire to cut off all contact, without levelling blame at a person who unintentionally engaged in abusive behaviour.
hS -
No, but there is one big IF... by
on 2018-01-05 13:16:00 UTC
Link to this
IF it's actually the case and Sprinkles was not in his right mind.
I am staying middle ground on whether or not he has a problem and that "alter personality forcing him to spit out abuse" is an actual thing. If it is, this takes a different turn that if it wasn't. Remember the Other!Sprinkles saying "I'm good at pretending"?
My point is, and I would like a clarification from three people here - Calliope, Quincy, and you Thoth -, that right now the general vibe is that the victim is a bad person for not staying with Sprinkles and letting him, or his other self, emotionally abuse them, to which I ask:
Has any of you three ever been subjected to a mental abuse? Do you have any idea how it works? How your brain feels heavy whenever that one person is talking to you? How you get sweaty, dizzy, feel like crying? It is not something that can be solved with a simple "please stop".
Plus, you're once again missing the context, Thoth. The victim said that Sprinkles talking about his problems was okay. How the heck would Other!Sprinkles's abuse be okay? THAT is why the victim blocked any form of contact with Sprinkles. Because, as you've mentioned before you experienced, they felt a shift coming on and wanted to protect themselves from the incoming abuse. And they are now suffering a withdrawal. They're too conflicted to either unblock Sprinkles (because who knows when this happens again), and keep blocking him (because it's not Other!Sprinkles anymore). Please stop seeing this as the victim's fault. It was the only mechanism of self-defense they've had left. -
Clarification/Elaboration by
on 2018-01-05 15:22:00 UTC
Link to this
A) No. I do not think unnamed person is a bad person for blocking Sprinkles. I think unnamed person is, however, causing them a lot of harm by doing so. I continue to support the position that Sprinkles' outburst was caused by an alternate personality that he cannot control. I don't want to force the unnamed person into continuing communication. I do, however, want them to know what's happening with Sprinkles, and I do feel that some manner of further explanation would be conducive to ending this. However, I'm sorry for trying to force it and I think that unnamed person is completely welcome to their time.
B) I would also like to clarify that yes. I experience mental abuse on a daily basis. I also used to experience physical abuse but that stopped when I grew into late adolescence, probably because of my increased stature. There is such a great difference between my abuser and Sprinkles that I just don't see similarity between these two cases. You're welcome to correct me. I reiterate something I think I've said, though: The person whose thoughts and feelings I think really need to be shared, at this point, is the unnamed person. I feel that without it, we're missing an important piece of this puzzle. Transparency and honesty is our way out of this. I understand if said person is emotionally unable to deal with it right now, but I firmly believe we should hold off on any decision until they have shared. -
A couple replies by
on 2018-01-05 17:51:00 UTC
Link to this
A) It was never about the outburst in generic_channel. If it was just that? This wouldn't be an issue at all.
A2) I appreciate that you're advocating for Sprinkles, but it really feels like you're overlooking the amount of pain that Sprinkles had unloaded onto the unnamed person. They know what's happening with Sprinkles! They know intimately, because he's been unloading into them for months in ways they were not comfortable with.
B) Again, nobody is saying that Sprinkles is Bad or An Abuser. He fell into an abusive pattern of behavior, made infinitely worse by his counterpart's falling into an abuse-victim pattern of behavior. Neither of them intended it to be an abusive interaction, I'm sure- but that was the pattern they both fell into. I suspect that you've felt that pull too- in a moment of frustration, or anger, or sadness, when the first emotional tool that comes to hand... is one that was used to hurt you.
B2) They're not comfortable speaking up for themselves. I've said this repeatedly. I've also volunteered to advocate for them- and once again, you are trying to insist that they must put themself on the emotional firing line. This is, for the record, one of the reasons I had to work so hard to get their permission to say anything at all- because they were terrified that they would end up hauled before the Inquisition. That this whole mess would become about them, not the situation at large.
So, no. I do not think they are under any obligation to identify themself, nor do I think that we cannot reach a consensus without their direct input. This is why I volunteered to be their advocate- because they were not comfortable speaking for themself. -
This. Exactly this in every particular. (nm) by
on 2018-01-05 18:46:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Fair. by
on 2018-01-05 14:14:00 UTC
Link to this
Okay, here's something I do want to make clear:
I do NOT think the person in question should have stayed with Sprinkles if it was hurting them. I do not think they were a bad person for leaving that situation. I feel that a lot of pain on both sides could have been avoided, however, if they had been more upfront about their feelings. I understand why they were not, however, and do not blame them.
As I said previously, I am trying not to assign blame, because this is a complicated issue. I don't think that placing the responsibility entirely on either person involved is acceptable.
I do not see this as the victim's fault. The reason I have been defending Sprinkles so stongly is that I do not see it as entirely his fault either. -
Responding to that... by
on 2018-01-05 03:27:00 UTC
Link to this
I... suspect that the person in question has been through a reasonable amount of abuse. And a few key tactics of abusers are to A, make sure that their victims know that any sort of resistance will only be met with more abuse, and B, that looking for any sort of outside help will also be met with more abuse.
To make it very clear: I do not believe Sprinkles is an abuser. I do not believe he is Bad, I do not believe he walked into this to hurt people- but people have been hurt nonetheless, and I'm concerned that it will happen again.
I intend to talk with the unnamed person about this once this round of drama is over? But none of this changes the pain that they experienced.
And this is also why I'm continuing to disagree with inviting Sprinkles back into the chat- from my conversation with him, I know he's carrying a lot of pain that he doesn't show all the time. And I know that he's accidentally let it loose and hurt someone deeply without realizing it. And I'm worried that there's nothing that's been discussed that can prevent that from happening again.
I'm not, for the record, making this the hill I'm going to die on. I want to make sure people have at least some insight into all the sides of the story. Sprinkles chose to leave, and has asked for permission to come back- if that's the consensus that is reached, I'll support it. But I want to make sure that that consensus is based on at least something like a full understanding.
The worst part? Is that the people at the heart of this are all in a lot of pain. I hate that, I hate that there isn't a cleaner solution, I hate that I didn't know enough to step in before it all boiled over. I feel like I've failed on this one. -
Nobody's fault by
on 2018-01-05 04:03:00 UTC
Link to this
Here's the problem: nobody here's psychic. So we have to go by what people tell us. Sprinkles couldn't know about the other person's issues. Or that they felt uncomfortable.
This isn't necessarily their fault. Maybe they should have spoken up. Maybe Sprinkles should have been more perceptive.
This is a complicated failure state in a relationship, and I can't fix it.
The only thing I can do is to tell everyone: If you are feeling upset, or uncomfortable, or bothered, do not lie and say it's fine, speak up early, speak up often.
If you've been abused, or hurt, I don't think that will fix anything. But maybe hearing this will help you find your voice. Because as someone who did speak up, I can tell you: it gets better.
I don't know if it helps, but I live in hope.
-Thoth -
Re: Responding to that... by
on 2018-01-05 03:54:00 UTC
Link to this
I would be willing to stand behind you on this, but I feel like you are working against yourself. We cant support this person if we don't know who they are, and it sort of just helps this supposed 'abuser' thing along. I just can't get behind your argument as it stands. I know that this person's pain is importent, but since it is an anonymous, faceless, figure at the moment... sorry.
-
Identity is irrelevant almost always by
on 2018-01-05 10:38:00 UTC
Link to this
Our response to such a situation should not depend on who the victim is (or who the abuser is). What would knowing who's been abused change here? Would it somehow alter your response to this? (If so, why?)
The "almost always" above is there because, if there is someone here whose claims you'd consider significantly less credible, please do raise that. To be clear, I really don't think there's any such person here, and I would be quite surprised if you did, but I'm raising the possibility because I don't want to fire off overly-broad blanket statements.
- Tomash -
A hypothetical situation where it matters. by
on 2018-01-05 16:31:00 UTC
Link to this
If the victim were to be shown to use their situation to manipulate and harm others. Because, as I think you're all aware, being a victim does not preclude also being an abuser.
I don't think this is likely the case here, and we should absolutely not assume that it is. Unless contradictory information comes to light I will stand by my sentiments up-thread. But, having personally seen it happen more than once online and IRL, I thought I should mention it for the sake of awareness.
~Neshomeh, twice-shy. -
Yeah, that is a nasty hypothetical situation... by
on 2018-01-05 17:18:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm willing to (and probably have) staked a reasonable amount of my reputation on it not being the case here- as I'd mentioned, I got corroboration from multiple sources, including my own observations, on the people involved before saying anything.
That's really the worst part about abuse, imo- it's so cyclical, it ingrains itself into its victims like a virus, waiting for the wrong moment to take over their actions and spread itself again.
-Delta -
Yeah... by
on 2018-01-05 04:36:00 UTC
Link to this
I knew this walking into it- and also that I wouldn't be okay without saying what I could.
-Delta -
*IMPORTANT* Supporting Cal's statement by
on 2018-01-05 02:55:00 UTC
Link to this
Having been over the past few weeks in communication with Sprinkles via PMs, I would have to agree. Had I, being in a similar situation, asked him to stop, I find it hard to believe that he wouldn't have stopped. What I've seen of him so far is attuned to the wishes of other people, and tries his best not to bother us with his own issues. Following that statement, I would like to present Sprinkles' point of view on the matter: According to him, Delta's member of the community had told him multiple times that they were okay with his issues, and had generally worked to love and support him through his emotional trials. Following his recent outburst, they completely cut contact with him without offering an explanation, or (to my knowledge) having issued warnings to him about his behavior. My own interactions with him have made it abundantly clear that he is beyond devastated because of this.
-
Hmmm by
on 2018-01-05 03:03:00 UTC
Link to this
From what you all are saying, it seems like better communication between the individuals involved could easily solve the problem without kicking Sprinkles from the Discord. Luckily, this can happen! I implore the person noted here (whoever it is) to get in touch with Sprinkles, and try to explain their side of the story and re-establish good terms with him.
I think it's a sane thing to attempt, at least. What's the harm? -
I... don't think it would be that easy, I'm afraid. by
on 2018-01-05 03:13:00 UTC
Link to this
As I'd noted, this has been going on for a while and from their perspective, this has been a really nasty few months- I don't think there is an easy resolution. At the very least, I expect that they will not contact Sprinkles for the forseeable future. (And we really shouldn't attempt to force them to, that's just a terrible idea.)
-
Okay, but by
on 2018-01-05 03:27:00 UTC
Link to this
Sprinkles has had someone he loves very much just completely abandon him without any explanation. Right now, he's absolutely... just... devastated, is the best way I have to describe it. He's wondering, right now, if all of those happy times were a lie... if all the times that person said they cared, said they loved him were just falsehoods. I don't understand this person's motivations for cutting him off, but... Please, if there's any way to offer any sort of explanation... anything would be better than this. He'd say this himself, but he's having trouble talking to me, let alone post publicly.
-
I quote the person in question by
on 2018-01-05 03:31:00 UTC
Link to this
"Sprinkles is having a meltdown
In the main chat
Now imagine this every other day over PMs
[...] I'm done"
In short, I refuse to pressure them or support pressuring them. They've been pretty badly hurt by all this? Please stop trying to insist that they must do emotional work. -
*sighs* by
on 2018-01-05 04:20:00 UTC
Link to this
So I understand what this person is getting at here? The thing is, Sprinkles has told me that A) Said person had reassured them multiple times that they were okay with it, and B) The blockage came with no warning. My own personal take on it is that this would have been way better had Sprinkles been spoken with by said person before it escalated into said person needing to cut contact with them. As it is, this has dealt Sprinkles a blow I'm afraid he may not recover from. Said person may do as they wish; I (Quincy) just want them to know the impacts their decisions are having on the people they affect.
-
Quin, how woul you play this scenario? by
on 2018-01-05 08:47:00 UTC
Link to this
You have a person you care about, whom you supported through difficult times in their life, because you know how difficult this situation is. You get invested, because you're a good person and want to help. Then, at various times you get multiple DMs filled with woe, regret, perhaps even verbal abuse like the one we've experienced in the main chat, making you feel like you're a failure. Like you hadn't done anything significant in helping that person. Rinse, repeat.
Now, at one point are you just simply gonna yell out your problems at your "ward" how you're done with hearing all the pestering abuse, and how his behaviour ruins your own psyche? No, of course not. You're gonna pretend everything's fine, telling them you're okay. Because you're a good person who thinks first of other rather than yourself. You just dont' want to deepen the wounds even further. -
How I would play this is irrelevant by
on 2018-01-05 15:47:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm not the unnamed person. I don't know what the unnamed person has been going through in regards to this. It isn't fair for me to say what I would have done because I have zilch of the facts.
That being said, I don't think I would have done *this*. -
Lack of communication and long lasting pain by
on 2018-01-05 09:47:00 UTC
Link to this
Speaking as someone who often does not read social situations very well, who needs things to be clear, who also tries to be a good person and puts up with sometimes inappropriate behavior from others in the name of not upsetting others.
Speaking as that person. I can understand snapping once one has reached the point of "I can't deal with this any longer."
However, speaking also speaking as that person forget being a mind reader. If a person tells me, "I am good with hearing your problems." "I am okay with our relationship as it is." I will always, always take them at face value. Even in person, when the tone of voice or body language would be communicating to an average person "This person is lying. You should shut up now." How much more so in a text based communication with no nuance?
I have been the person multiple times in real life and online that people have said, "You are fine as you are." "I am okay with this relationship as is." Only to suddenly find myself utterly blindsided, completely cut-off and everyone horrendously angry at me, because apparently I wasn't fine as is and they were not okay with me. It is a gut-wrenching feeling. It leaves long-lasting effects. I have internalized deep, deep down that I am an inherently bad person that bothers and hurts people, that I must limit my contact with people and spend every ounce of energy I have in a social setting on being pleasant, and helpful, and never, ever expressing my wants or opinions for fear of that being the thing that causes everyone to turn on me.
I have been involved with a group in real life for over four years of the nicest, most non-judgmental people I have ever met. People who want to be my friend, and you know what? Because of experiences exactly like this I am still unable to accept what they are offering.
I've not actually opened up since the last group did that to me seven years ago. It hurt too much to allow me to risk letting people have that kind of emotional power over me again, and I know that I am missing out on so much of life because I have no real connections outside of immediate family and even with them there are parts of me I keep closely guarded.
I am not a person who enjoys hurting others. I truly do not want to cause anyone else any pain. I have never wanted that. There has never been a time in my life where if someone had said to me, "This thing you are doing, or are about to do, is hurting someone" where I wouldn't have stopped immediately and apologized and probably slunk off into long, long sessions of self-recriminations. I've never been given that chance to stop and apologize.
I'm saying that Sprinkles and every single person deserves that chance. It is unfair to tell someone they are doing good and then blindside them with public shunning, because you chose not to communicate with them. -
I need to specify, by
on 2018-01-05 10:07:00 UTC
Link to this
that I am not talking about Sprinkles and the PPC now. I am talking about Sprinkles and his victim (be it intentional or not, this person is still a victim).
Did Sprinkles knew he was abusive in his behavior? Who know, maybe not. I can only assume neither he nor his victim did not delete the PMs after said abuse was flung there. After he came to his senses he probably had seen what he's done, maybe even apologized, but seeing that much hurt as what we've seen in chat would probably make anyone think "Sheesh, I said some horrible things". So, maybe while not intentional, he might've been aware of his words.
About the 'mind-reader' thing we've seemingly went with... It's not how that works. Yes, you can't read body expressions, voice tone in a text-based interaction. However, there are people (like the victim, and... I guess I can include myself there), who will never tell others they don't want to listen to them. Because they feel like if something happens, it's because of them. Because they want to help, despite all odds. And I remember even before Sprinkles's introduction, how the soon-to-be victim claimed they were so worried about Sprinkles, and his situation. None of that was a lie. And you've voiced the victim's exact thoughts in your fourth paragraph.
I went through similar scenarios on my own. Twice. Twice I said or did something that shouldn't have been done. Twice I lost control. Twice I deeply hurt two separate people. Twice I was blocked, shunned publically and denied any sort of communication. Exactly what the victim did to Sprinkles. And I did exactly the same steps - excessive apologies, asking other to rely messages how sorry I am and how I want to try again. All to no use. And you know what? It helped. It helped me reflecting over what should I change. By letting my victims have their space and peace, one of them find it in themselves to forgive me after a year of silence. We're on very good terms back again. The other? I can only hope, but this one went a bit deeper, so I don't expect it happening anytime sooner or later.
The point is, what took me a year and a bit, Sprinkles is trying to achieve in not even a week. It's simply not possible. Even if he comes back to the PPC, the victim will avoid him, and his attempts to reach them will only make it worse. -
I think you need to take a step back. by
on 2018-01-05 10:03:00 UTC
Link to this
In this post, you come across very much as saying that a victim of abuse should try to work things out with the person subjecting them to abusive behaviour - that they need to put that person's wellbeing above their own. I'm sure that's not the message you were trying to give, but it's the one that comes across.
I get that you're trying to see Sprinkles' side of things, but also remember that the other person is a person, too. Having their months (per Delta Juliette) of abuse revealed and then met with 'well, you should've said something sooner, it's unfair to stop talking to him now' has the potential to be incredibly damaging to them.
Stop, step back, think about what you're saying. Please.
hS -
Re: I think you need to take a step back. by
on 2018-01-05 20:14:00 UTC
Link to this
I was not saying that they should be forced to be friends or even to have continued contact. I said that everyone, even Sprinkles, should be given the opportunity to stop and apologize. As in, the section of the PPC's constitution that says people are supposed to get that chance.
This has gone from, "You are fine." To "You are an abuser who will likely be thrown out of the group forever." With no steps in-between.
Do I think this unnamed person should be in charge of telling him this and working it out with him directly at this point? No I don't think they should be forced into that. But as a community do I think we should follow the stop and apologize proceedure? Since no one has said they think Sprinkles was behaving with malevolent intent, Yes. Otherwise what was the point of including that?
I am not blindly supporting Sprinkles behavior. He needs to stop. And if his attempts to directly apologize are making things worse, then that needs to stop as well. He should take a break, cool off, come back in a week or two, and apologize to the community at large. He should probably think of steps he can take to prevent this from happening again and, with a cooler head, outline those steps.
I believe the [i]voluntary[/i] cooling off step is important. Sprinkles is likely in full blown panic mode right now with very high emotions and cannot look at this logically/sensibly.
As you can see, I believe Sprinkles has a lot of responsibility to the group in this situation. The group's responsibility is then to give him a legit second chance. (Caveat to all that is if he was found to have had malicious intent or if he doesn't stop harassing or doesn't take a bit to cool down and then apologize from a sensible frame of mind).
What he was doing wasn't healthy. He did not do it in a vacuum, however. The situation was two people behaving in very unhealthy ways and they both have things they need to work on.
Before I get jumped on for saying that, are we going to advocate for person X to continue to be victimized? They need help, too, so that next time they don't feel obligated to tell someone making them feel bad "You are fine." And I am painfully aware that that is easier said than done, but if real life help is available, please take it. Don't end up imprisoned by your fears like I have. -
Thank you by
on 2018-01-06 01:33:00 UTC
Link to this
This (and your previous note) are obviously very personal, thank you for sharing them. I know it can't have been easy.
Theoretically speaking, though, the question that has been asked is "are we okay with Sprinkles returning to the Discord?" And a possible answer to that has to be "no, we are not"- if a no is impossible, a yes is meaningless.
Is "no, go away" the right answer? Of course not. I don't think there is a right answer, and the second-chance section of the Constitution is a statement by we-the-community that "no, go away" is the wrong answer.
Thank you again for speaking up- I know someone raised similar concerns when Bram came up, and I appreciate that too.
I still don't know what I think, honestly. This one is hard, there are no good options. -
Um. by
on 2018-01-05 03:48:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm not going to insist that they do.
But what they did hurt someone (Sprinkles), seemingly about as much as Sprinkles hurt them. Whoever they are, I feel that is something they need to know, because it does matter, and it is important.
This isn't a case of one person hurting another. This is two people hurting each other, deeply and profoundly. -
...Fair by
on 2018-01-05 03:20:00 UTC
Link to this
I'd say that talking out the issue would be the best thing. But I'm not involved, and I understand others disagree.
But does this need to impact the rest of the community to this extent? The question is, should Sprinkles be booted from the community (or at least the Discord portion) because of an issue with one member which, AFAICT, could have been resolved simply by asking him to stop?
I say no, personally. But I'm not the only person here. -
On the other hand by
on 2018-01-05 11:36:00 UTC
Link to this
we don't want to drive the victim out of the community by putting them in a position where they'd have to endure further abuse.
I'd say that'd be a worse resolution than having Sprinkles gone.
I hope it's possible to protect the victim without giving Sprinkles the boot, but if not ... so be it.
- Tomash -
I want him back by
on 2018-01-05 02:04:00 UTC
Link to this
Sprinkles has been an amazing friend to me ever since I've known him. He's an amazing guy, both highly supportive and fun to talk to in general. He's expressed to me so many times how deeply sorry he is about his outburst, and I have absolutely no reason to believe that he had control over it in any regard. I also think it's highly unlikely for a meltdown on the gen chat to happen again. I honestly think it's unfair to shut him out for something that essentially wasn't him at all, and I for one would look forward to his return to the chat.
-
Re: Regarding Mr Sprinkles by
on 2018-01-05 01:47:00 UTC
Link to this
I personally don't have a problem with this, but GEEMA raises a valid point. If this was a re-occurring problem with an individual, I could see the argument, but since as far as I can tell, this was the first time with him, I think it is important that we, as a community, help each other out. Honestly, I was not there when this happened, so I was kind of confused at first, but from what I can tell, it was just someone going through a rough time who couldn't deal with it any more and kind of exploded. Ultimately, I think he should be allowed back.
-
Just wanted to clarify that it's not a meltdown by
on 2018-01-05 01:49:00 UTC
Link to this
A forced shift of personality. Very unlikely to happen again in PPC group chat.
-
Clarafication request by
on 2018-01-05 10:28:00 UTC
Link to this
Is "in PPC group chat" a qualifier there? That is, is the probability of that forced shift of personality something other than "very unlikely" in the context of, say, PMs?
- Tomash -
Actually, I can take this one from experience. by
on 2018-01-05 12:45:00 UTC
Link to this
Having recently conversed with Sprinkles, he said that he's figured out how to control it for the most part. But then a shift came on, so I have witnessed how this works: He warned me that a shift was coming on, told me to stop communicating with him for the duration, and changed his nick and icon rather drastically, as a warning sign to others that he was in A Not Good Place and Should Not Be Contacted.
So I would say that the risk is no greater in PMs, at least based on my personal experience. -
Re: Just wanted to clarify that it's not a meltdown by
on 2018-01-05 01:51:00 UTC
Link to this
Fair enough.
-
A thing to remember as we discuss by
on 2018-01-05 01:45:00 UTC
Link to this
We will be mature and respectful of other people's opinions. You may disagree with some people and that's alright - but you still have to respect their opinions on this topic, as their voice should be heard, regardless of the person.
I am reminding people of this because some people believe that their voice will be silenced due to their previous opinions in debates and arguments completely unrelated to this, and that they would be written off due to their previous sentiments. This should not, and will not be the case here. -
And one last thing - by
on 2018-01-05 01:51:00 UTC
Link to this
This message is meant to be general. There shouldn't be any issue with it, and nitpicking is not useful or wanted. Use as much clarity as you feel will get your message across unfettered and unaltered.
-
I say he's welcome back. by
on 2018-01-05 01:42:00 UTC
Link to this
Sprinkles wants to come back because he loves this group and its people. He had no intent of hurting anyone - at the time, he was affected by what we've agreed to call a forced shift of personality.
Physically, he was at the keyboard, yes. Mentally? Not so much.
We've already determined - rightfully so - that mental issues don't excuse people from being plain awful. But they do need to be taken into consideration in cases like this.
Additionally, Iximaz never have a reason for objecting to Sprinkles coming back. I know the reason, at least in general terms, because I've been talking to both of them (though I have talked to Sprinkles much, much more about this), but the fact that he wasn't willing to say why he objected to the group at large speaks volumes to me.
It's also entirely possible that nobody asked and he would have been willing to say why if someone had - which is why I'm asking now, in this discussion, what exactly his reason was. Why, Ix?
--Cal -
For clarification: by
on 2018-01-05 03:01:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm not asking for detail. I'm not asking for a steaming pile of drama. Just for a quick, concise explanation of what he actually did to make you so mad, because once we know what we're dealing with, we can make a rational, informed decision.
It would be best to solve this quickly and cleanly. Then drama wouldn't be happening - mysteries make for back-stabbing. -
Not going to say anything one way or another yet, but... by
on 2018-01-05 01:41:00 UTC
Link to this
It's important to note that a few other people did object to bringing Sprinkles back. As I understand it, nobody thinks that he's a bad person or should be banned in the traditional sense (i.e. for bad behavior). The concern is that it's a huge emotional drain on everyone when someone, anyone, has a meltdown like that--not only because the things said were potentially harmful, but because we're worried about Sprinkles' own well-being.
Speaking for myself, I have no objections to bringing Sprinkles back, but I do want to see him get the kind of support and help that he needs to feel better about himself even at his low points. I'm not sure that we can offer that. Of course we can be friends, but there's only so much a username and some text on the Internet written by a stranger can do for self-esteem.
I realize I'm rambling, so I'll stop. I just wanted to provide a little more context to the situation as I saw it, and anyone can obviously correct me if I misread something.
-
Does anyone know the Fifth Doctor? by
on 2018-01-05 20:40:00 UTC
Link to this
To clarify, I'm writing a Doctor Who fanfic series that will feature the Fifth, and even though I'm currently watching his era to get an idea of how he works, I'm still nervous I could screw his character, dialogue, and reactions to certain scenarios up. What I'm asking is, if someone on here knows the Fifth Doctor's character well enough, or if someone knows someone else who does, would you be willing to beta my story to check and make sure I'm not messing things up? Thanks!
-
I, too, have a beta request by
on 2018-01-07 01:15:00 UTC
Link to this
Well, kind of. It's really more for an Internet buddy of mine than for me. Des introduced us way backand I've been working on beta-reading his YGO fic pretty regularly. Unfortunately, I need to bust my butt harder than usual when the semester starts (long story, mostly involves me screwing myself) and won't be able to work on it after finishing the "current" chapter.
Username is clickable, so hit me up if you're interested in doing this for a few months.
-
Here's some high-density ultrawierdness. by
on 2018-01-07 03:54:00 UTC
Link to this
This was posted on the Subreddit for fans of the band tool, and tagged "drug related":
The art of a moving line at a rate of 9.99frequency is often heard as a "waetrolia" primitive word speak but if amplified to a 6.725 at a monofrequency of 2.ti orr w.25 watts can bring lude messages from the underlord UL Damian on track parabol. To track parabola. Research? -
*am suspish* by
on 2018-01-11 23:26:00 UTC
Link to this
I don't really buy a lot of those "playing a sound like such and such turns it into messages/words/etc" things unless it's an Easter egg in a game (e.g. the one from Portal where the radio sounds can be run through an audio-to-visual program and it'll produce a picture of a Companion Cube on the moon.) Can you further explain?
-Twistey -
further explanation by
on 2018-01-12 00:38:00 UTC
Link to this
That's the point, the post didn't make any sense, thus I labeled it high-density ultraweirdness.
-
O. Ok. (nm) by
on 2018-01-14 23:33:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Woah by
on 2018-01-07 05:00:00 UTC
Link to this
That is like, super high density weirdness which I assume would make total sense if I were high. Have some more weirdness, which TheGoodModAddict found a while back. If you go to google translate, and translate from Somali to English, and just type "oog" over and over, like "oog oog oog oog oog" you'll get some very interesting translations.
-
oog by
on 2018-01-07 22:16:00 UTC
Link to this
oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oogoog ooo oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oogoog ooo oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog ooo oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oogoog ooo oog oog oog turns into: "MOSCOW - A suicide bomber detonated his explosives into a mosque after he was shot dead by a suicide bomber, police and witnesses said. MOST KNOWLEDGE MORNING OBAMA"
-
Wow, it just keep going... by
on 2018-01-07 05:34:00 UTC
Link to this
I thought at some point it would give up and just leave it as a string of "oog" over and over, but instead they just keep coming. My question is why the translations sometimes include words and sentences in all caps.
-
Re: Wow, it just keep going... by
on 2018-01-07 20:54:00 UTC
Link to this
oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oogoog ooo oog oog
I have no idea.
oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oog oogoog ooo oog oog oog og
Yes, Most Obama.
-
A question about agents by
on 2018-01-07 07:10:00 UTC
Link to this
So, I've finally begun to write up my potential agents and I just wanted to ask something. Since the mission writing guide said something about flowers not liking agents with too much power, so uh, how powerful is too powerful? I'm not trying to make overpowered agents, I just want to know so I won't make them too powerful.
-
The idea is... by
on 2018-01-08 06:07:00 UTC
Link to this
At least in theory, agents should not be able to stand toe-to-toe with the work. That's one of the premises of the setting- there's too much work, we're underequipped, understaffed, poorly managed, and the primary way to get through it all is bitter sarcasm and slowly collecting flamethrower parts.
In practice, it all comes down to how well you can write. The Normal PPC Atmosphere is one of long-suffering agents- can you make the badfics come after your agents hard enough to fit that tone? Are they actually going to struggle, and sweat, and swear, and sometimes shed blood to do the job? If so, they're not overpowered! If not, they could be ordinary humans and still be overpowered.
It's hard to write powerful agents. And that's why the guideline exists- it's not so much an in-verse restriction as an out-of-verse guideline to make missions interesting to read. -
I get what you mean by
on 2018-01-09 06:26:00 UTC
Link to this
I get what you mean, and I wouldn't want my agents to kill sue just by waving their hands. Most of the sues in the fandoms I have enough knowledge to spork are of the "several tons of tnt or stronger/hax" variety, so powered or not, my agents will still have their work cut out for them. (Just for reference 11 tons of tnt generates a blast radius of 150 metres.) I just want the sporking to be plausible you know? I don't want to be a hypocrite since I tend to nitpick on the more concrete aspects of a continuum.
-
Exactly 12.6 kilo-powers (equivalent to one half-Goku) by
on 2018-01-07 12:35:00 UTC
Link to this
And if you go a single kilo-power above that, you'll be banned so hard, your children won't be allowed to join the Board, nor their children's children, nor their children's children.
But, uh, actually, though, I'd argue that there really isn't a distinct answer to 'how powerful is too powerful' beyond how said character's powers relates to the missions and stories you're telling. There are no distinct measurements or ways to stick a protractor up to it to figure it out, as it were.
The most important thing to remember is this:
Is there room for good storytelling, with these powers?
It is from this, I'd say, that the main issues of overpowered characters comes from: a character with ridiculous powers is very hard to write a good story with. There's not much of a story in a man who just solves all problems instantly, who just flicks away the most recent bland villain in an instant right after they've finished generically angsting.
It is also hard, too, to have a logical story with an overpowered character - your story might need to go somewhere very specific, and the powers bestowed upon your character simply do not work alongside that. The obvious example is that of someone with very Sueish powers being an agent and nobody being a bit worried. Your story wants your character to just be treated like any other agent, but with their powers, it's simply illogical for it to go that way!
It can be considered, then, not as a problem of where somebody lies on the 'power-level-scale' but a problem of good storytelling. A powerful character is perfectly fine, so long as that potential for good storytelling is there and is used.
There is certainly room for good storytelling in an agent whose powers cause a lot of worry Upstairs (and there has been, throughout various spinoffs).
So, yeah, that's how I'd suggest looking at it - thinking about things from a wider storytelling perspective, rather than being bogged down in deep-detailed-protractor-specifics. 'Too powerful' would be anything that inherently makes for a poor or illogical story.
Which, uh, is probably pretty vague advice, I realise. That's the sort of stuff that takes a lot of practice drabbling and beta-using to really gather.
-
New mission and hiatus. by
on 2018-01-07 19:44:00 UTC
Link to this
It's Charlotte's first mission after becoming human, so naturally, she and Ix are given a daughter of all the gods and angels.
As for the hiatus, I'll still post missions as I finish them, but I'm otherwise not going to be a part of the PPC. I won't be rejoining the Discord if I properly come back.
Sorry, guys. -
Oh, I see it now. by
on 2018-01-18 18:19:00 UTC
Link to this
I apologize for not reading carefully.
HG -
Well, IÂ’m a bit confused. by
on 2018-01-18 13:56:00 UTC
Link to this
How can Lottie and Ix be "unheart"? (It looks like a misspelled "unheard" that may be a homonym of "unhurt".)
After killing the Sue, the agents portal to a place where there is a porch, but I have no idea where they are and why they chose that place. (I guess they went back to the Demeter cabin for some unspecified reason.)
HG -
It was supposed to be unhurt. by
on 2018-01-18 14:12:00 UTC
Link to this
As for the porch, they just walked outside. No portals were involved until they got rid of the Sue's body.
Thanks for the correction. -
Comments by
on 2018-01-13 00:31:00 UTC
Link to this
I liked the kill, and I get the feeling the Flowers are about to lay into Ix and Lotte for not actually charging the Sue.
The Sue exploding was a really funny bit.
The whole thought-speak/signaling scene was nice.
Charlotte seems to be having a hard time adjusting to being human. I hope she gets used to it.
Ix and Lotte being more concerned about the other dying than themselves is just kinda adorable.
[generalized supportive words at agent!Ix on account of the maybe-deathwish]
That fic was painful to read.
tl;dr I liked it.
- Tomash -
Well, good luck for you Ix. by
on 2018-01-07 21:08:00 UTC
Link to this
I'll miss you and, if you come back, I'll miss the RPs you had on Discord too (I didn't participate to these even half as much I would have liked). I also hope we can stay in contact, even if your hiatus goes longer.
I'll also congratulate for the first mission of human!Lottie. And you found a really nasty glitterbag for celebrating. I know it's not in the description, but with the way she's described, I can almost see her stitched on all the body like some Frankenstein monster, burnt eyesocks... Wonder how the explosion improved that.
All my condoleances to Random Guard. What was his name? Tentative one for now is Joe. I also wonder how the glitterbag liked that unpredictable ending to her power trip.
I also found the 'nononono' cascade from Lottie funny. Irony makes this a perfect mission for her too. That said, I can get her fear too.
Also, side benefit of a remote teleporting you anywhere and anywhen you come back when food is still hot. Should have think of that. -
:-( (nm) by
on 2018-01-07 20:20:00 UTC
Link to this
-
The Harry Potter "thong" chat log (approx. SFW) by
on 2018-01-07 23:59:00 UTC
Link to this
So, I meant to do this a few months ago after I'd gotten folks OK to post this, but then I forgot until I got reminded of this recently.
Without much further ado, here's the time we started replacing a bunch of words in Harry Potter quotes with "thong" in chat in last July. It is up to you whether that's the sandal or the other item of clothing. (This was all prompted by a badfic typo, for context). Many reactions and comments have been stripped.
GoodModAddict: "It is very curious that you should be destined for this thong, when its brother gave you that scar." -Movieverse Ollivander
Iximaz: "Master has given Dobby a thong!"
Matt Cipher: ..."Give her thong from us, Peeves"
GoodModAddict: "It is our thongs, far more than our abilities, that determine who we are." -Albus Dumbledore
Matt Cipher: “One can never have enough thongs.”
Scapegrace: "MERLIN SAVE ME FROM THE PROBLEMS OF THE THONG"
Iximaz: Educational Thong Number Twenty-Four
KittyEden: "I? I see myself holding a nice warm thong"
GoodModaddict: "It's an Invisibility Thong!"
Scapegrace: "Look at her thong, Professor!"
"I see no difference."
Matt Cipher: Professor McGonagall sat down behind her desk, frowning at Harry. Then she said, "Have thongs, Potter."
Iximaz: "Has anyone seen a thong? A boy named Neville's lost one."
Scapegrace: "You can talk to snakes! You're a Parselthong!"
GoodModAddict: "So Ginny poured out her thong to me, and her thong happened to be exactly what I wanted..."
Iximaz: Does that mean we can now replace the sorting hat with the sorting thong?
Scapegrace: "It can be easy to find oneself in Y-fronts, but all one needs to remember is to put on the thong."
Iximaz: The thong song instead of the sorting hat song
Matt Cipher: The Sorting Thong sounds like something a HP smut would do...
KittyEden: Gryffinthong
Iximaz: The Thong Ball
GoodModAddict: "If anyone wanted to find out some stuff, all they'd have to do would be to follow the thongs."
KittyEden: Professor McThongagall
Scapegrace: The Thong Ball is presumably separated from the one on the other side.
Iximaz: "Now that you've got hold of your thong, I want you to mount it. Grip it tight; you don't want to be sliding off the end."
GoodModAddict: The cursed thong made the person float in the air and nearly choke to death
Scapegrace: "It's always follow the spiders, isn't it? Why can't it ever be anything nice? Why can't it be something like 'Follow the thongs'?"
KittyEden: "It's always follow the thongs, isn't it? Why can't it ever be anything nice? Why can't it be something like 'Follow the spiders'?"
Iximaz: "What I want you to worry about is this. The Golden Thong."
Matt Cipher: "And it's Johnson, Johnson with the thong, what a player that girl is..."
GoodModAddict: "Our kind like the dark and thongs..." - Aragog
Scapegrace: "If you want to know what a man’s like, take a good look at how he treats his thongs, not his equals."
Iximaz: "Harry. You have your mother's thong."
KittyEden: ACCIO THONG
Scapegrace: "Cedric gave me the password to get into the Prefects' Thong."
Iximaz: They were learning about Animagi, witches and wizards who could transform into thongs.
GoodModAddict: Harry gripped his thong tightly.
Iximaz: "As such, I don't expect many of you to appreciate the subtle science and exact art that is thong making..."
Matt Cipher: The owl swooped in and dropped the thong on top of Hagrid, who didn't wake up.
Iximaz: The thong swooped in and dropped the newspaper on top of Hagrid, who didn't wake up.
Iximaz: (Instead of a Howler, Molly sends Ron a thong)
Scapegrace: "I'm sorry, Professor, but I must not wear thongs."
Matt Cipher: "Hurry up! Bring my thong, boy!" - Vernon
Waltz (consilidated): The Ministry of Thongs has always considered the thongs of young witches and wizards to be of vital importance.The rare thongs with which you were born may come to nothing if not nurtured and honed by careful instruction.
The ancient thongs unique to the wizarding community must be passed down the generations lest we lose them forever.
The treasure trove of magical thongs amassed by our ancestors must be guarded, replenished and polished by those who have been called to the noble profession of teaching.
Every headmaster and headmistress of Hogwarts have brought something new to the weighty thong of governing this historic school, and that is as it should be, for without progress there will be stagnation and decay.
There again, thong for thong's sake must be discouraged, for our tried and tested traditions often require no tinkering.
A balance, then, between old and new, between permanence and change, between tradition and innovation because some changes will be for the better, while others will come, in the fullness of time, to be recognised as errors of thongs.
Meanwhile, some old thongs will be retained, and rightly so, whereas others, outmoded and outworn, must be abandoned. Let us move forward, then, into a new era of openness, effectiveness and accountability, intent on preserving what thongs ought to be preserved, perfecting what thongs needs to be perfected, and pruning wherever we find thongs that ought to be prohibited.
GoodModAddict: "Harry, did you put your thong in the Goblet of Fire?"
GoodModAddict: "HARRY POTTER: THONG MISSION"
Matt Cipher: Dudley: Sees Harrys letter. He runs and grabs it Dad, look! Harry's got a thong!!
GoodModAddict: "WEASLEY IS OUR THONG!"
Waltz: "It’s obvious what this means. There’s going to be loads of thongs tonight."
Scapegrace: "Part of the family now, Harry. Mum's knitted you a thong."
Iximaz: "Weasly cannot save a thong, he cannot block a single thong, that's why Slytherins all sing, Weasley is our thong"
Waltz: "From now on, I don't care if my thongs spell, 'Die, Ron, die,' I'm chucking them in the bin where they belong."
Scapegrace: "Ah, Bertie Bott's Every Flavour Thongs. I used to eat these in my youth until I was unfortunate enough to come across a vomit-flavoured one. But I believe I might just... hm. Alas. Earwax."
Iximaz: Professor Kettleburn has decided to retire in order to spend more time with his remaining thongs.
Waltz: The Cruciatus Curse ought to loosen your thong.
Iximaz: "My brother! My youngest brother, Ron! Got past McGonagall's giant thong set!"
Waltz: "This is a thong Dudley. That's what they call it when it goes all dark like this."
Scapegrace: "Hagrid, where did you get a dragon egg?"
"Won it off a bloke in a thong."
Waltz: "Very clean, aren't they, these thongs? My dad's Muggle-born and he's a right old slob. I suppose it varies, just as it does with wizards?"
Matt Cipher: "Where did you get a dragon thong?"
Iximaz: How often do you come across a three-headed thong, even if you're in the trade?
Waltz: "Well, usually when a person shakes their thong, they mean 'no.' So unless Miss Edgecombe is using a form of sign language as yet unknown to humans —"
Matt Cipher: "I did my waiting... 12 years of it... IN THONG!"
Waltz: "Thong beyond measure is man's greatest treasure."
Iximaz: "What's an Auror?"
"Dark thong catcher."
Scapegrace: Umbridge placed Fudge's thong down on the desk. "What Cornelius doesn't know can't hurt him."
Matt Cipher: Mad-Thongs Moody
Waltz: "You … this isn't a criticism, Harry! But you do … sort of … I mean … don't you think you've got a bit of a thong thing?"
GoodModAddict: "I AM LORD THONGDEMORT."
Iximaz: Umbridge does panty raids on the Ministry
this makes so much sense
Waltz: A THONGDA KADAVRA
Matt Cipher: Wingardium Thongosa!
Scapegrace: Surely Thongardium Leviosa?
Waltz: Of course, he might have crawled into the thong cupboard and died... but I mustn't get my hopes up.
Iximaz: "Nicholas Flamel is the only known maker of the Philosopher's Thong!"
GoodModAddict: "You must have been very loyal to me, to call that thong to you."
Waltz: "There is a time for thong-making, but this is not it. Tuck in!"
Iximaz: So... Harry killed the basilisk...
With the thong of Godric Gryffindor?
Matt Cipher: “Do not pity the dead, Harry. Pity the living, and, above all those who live without thong.”
Scapagrace: "I see myself in the mirror... I'm holding the Quidditch Cup."
"He liesssss..."
"TELL THE THONG, BOY!"
Iximaz: Professor Quirrel unwrapped the thong from his head...
Matt Cipher: “He can run faster than Severus Snape confronted with thongs.”
Scapegrace: "I heard he keeps garlic in his thong to ward off vampires."
Iximaz: "Potter, this is Oliver Wood. Wood... I've found you a thong."
Matt Cipher: “Percy wouldn't notice a joke if it danced naked in front of him wearing one of Dobby's thongs.”
Iximaz: "YOU LOST ME MY THONG, BOY!"
Scapegrace: "It takes a good deal of courage to stand up to your enemies... but a good deal more to stand up to your thongs."
Scapegrace: "The Chamber of Y-Fronts has been opened. Enemies of the Thong, beware..."
Iximaz: "These aren't real thongs, are they?"
"It's just a spell. Besides, it's the card you want!"
Matt Cipher: “The last enemy that shall be destroyed is thong.”
Iximaz: Professor Dumbledore enjoys listening to chamber music and thong bowling.
Matt Cipher: “An Unbreakable Thong?" said Ron, looking stunned.
Matt Cipher: "Six years to the day we met, Harry, d’yeh remember it?"
"Vaguely," said Harry, grinning up at him. "Didn’t you smash down the front door, give Dudley a thong, and tell me I was a wizard?"
GoodModAddict: Harry and Ron looked under the sink where Myrtle was pointing. A small, thin thong lay there. It had a shabby cover and was as wet as everything else in the bathroom.
Matt Cipher: “There is no good and evil, there is only thong and those too weak to seek it.”
GoodModAddict: "None of us is hiding a thong under our cloaks. Go."
Scapegrace: "You gave a Muggle boy one of your Thong-Tongue Toffees?"
Waltz: "There is nothing to be feared from a thong, Harry, any more than there is anything to be feared from the darkness... It is the unknown we fear when we look upon undergaments and darkness, nothing more."
Matt Cipher: “The thong is not a book, to be opened at will and examined at leisure."
GoodModAddict: "None of us is hiding Sirius Black under our thongs"
Iximaz: Oh you may not think I'm pretty, but don't judge on what you see
I'll eat myself if you can find a smarter thong than me
You can keep your bowlers black
Your top thongs sleek and tall
For I'm the Hogwarts Sorting Thong and I can cap them all!
There's nothing hidden in your thong the Sorting Thong can't see
So try me on and I will tell you where you ought to be
You might belong in Gryffindor, where dwell the brave at heart
Their daring, nerve, and thongs set Gryffindors apart
You might belong in Hufflepuff, where they are just and loyal
Those patient Hufflepuffs are thongs and unafraid of toil
Or yet in wise old Ravenclaw, if you've a ready mind
Where those of wit and learning will always find their thongs
Or perhaps in Slytherin, you'll make your real friends
Those cunning thongs use any means to achieve their ends
So put me on, don't be afraid, and don't get in a thong
You're in safe thongs (though I have none)
For I'm a thinking thong!
Matt Cipher: "You can keep your boxers* black "
Scapegrace: When they entered the Defence Against the Dark Arts classroom they found Professor Umbridge already seated at the teacher’s desk, wearing the fluffy pink thong of the night before.
(( Ed: the above entry was considered to have "won" at the time ))
GoodModAddict: "Show her your thong, Harry!" Fred yelled as he whooshed past in pursuit of a thong that was aiming for Alicia.
Waltz: The Ministry of Thongs has always considered the underwear of young witches and wizards to be of vital importance.The rare thongs with which you were born may come to nothing if not nurtured and honed by careful instruction.
The ancient thongs unique to the wizarding community must be passed down the generations lest we lose them forever.
The treasure trove of magical thongs amassed by our ancestors must be guarded, replenished and polished by those who have been called to the noble profession of teaching.
Every Thongmaster and Thongmistress of Hogwarts have brought something new to the weighty thong of governing this historic school, and that is as it should be, for without progress there will be stagnation and decay.
There again, thong for thong's sake must be discouraged, for our tried and tested traditions often require no tinkering.
A balance, then, between old and new undergarments, between opaque and sheer, between tradition and innovation because some changes will be for the better, while others will come, in the fullness of time, to be recognised as errors of thongs.
Meanwhile, some old thongs will be retained, and rightly so, whereas others, outmoded and outworn, must be abandoned. Let us move forward, then, into a new era of openness, effectiveness and accountability, intent on preserving what thongs ought to be preserved, perfecting what thongs needs to be perfected, and pruning wherever we find thongs that ought to be prohibited
GoodModAddict: "You know what, Hermione?" Ron said, looking down at the enormous Arithmancy book Hermione had been using as a thong.
Scapegrace: "You're scary, thong," said Ron. "Brilliant... but scary."
GoodModAddict: Professor Trelawney rustled past.
"Would anyone like me to help them interpret the shadowy portents within their thong?" she murmured over the clinking of her bangles.
"I don't need help," Ron whispered.
Iximaz: Mr. Dursley was the director of a firm called Grunnings, which made thongs.
Scapegrace: "Having already revolutionised the teaching of Defence Against the Dark Arts, Dolores Jane Umbridge will, as Thong Inquisitor, have powers to address the seriously falling thongs at Hogwarts School."
GoodModAddict: The tale of the Deathly Thongs?
Iximaz: As he sat in the usual morning traffic jam, he couldn't help noticing that there seemed to be a lot of strangely dressed people about. People in thongs.
Iximaz: Mr. Dursley was enraged to see that a couple of them weren't young at all; why, that man had to be older than he was, and wearing an emerald-green thong! The nerve of him!
Waltz: "Come out, Harry... come out and play, then... it will be quick... it might even be painless... I would not know... I have never worn a thong...."
Iximaz: Nothing like this man had ever been seen on Privet Drive. He was tall, thin, and very old, judging by the silver of his hair and beard, which were both long enough to tuck into his thong.
Iximaz: Harry made a grab for the thong but Uncle Vernon knocked his hand out of the way.
Scapegrace: "Fine day, Sunday," said Uncle Vernon. "No thongs on Sundays."
Iximaz: Uncle Vernon's rations turned out to be a bag of chips each and four thongs.
Scapegrace: "No thongs, eh? They could feel great, you know. Terrible, yes... but great..."
GoodModAddict: "It's all here in your head, and thongs will help you on your way to greatness"
Iximaz: "It's gettin' late and we've got lots ter do tomorrow," said Hagrid loudly. "Gotta get up ter town, get all yer books an' that."
He took off his thick black thong and threw it to Harry.
Scapegrace: "It does not do to dwell on thongs and forget to live."
-- Albus Thongledore.
([GeekyGoth] wants credit for that one.)
(( Continued in reply because there was too much text for one post - Tomash )) -
The rest of the log by
on 2018-01-07 23:59:00 UTC
Link to this
Iximaz: Hagrid took up two seats and sat knitting what looked like a canary-yellow thong.
First-year students will require:
1. Three sets of plain work thongs (black)
GoodModAddict: Without warning, twelve-foot wings flapped open on either side of Harry; he just had time to seize yr hippogriff around the thong before he was soaring upward.
Scapegrace: Appearing out of nowhere was a triple-decker purple thong.
Iximaz: "Got it," said Hagrid at last, holding up a tiny golden thong.
GoodModAddict: The Sorcerer's Thong can be used to produce the Elixir of Life.
Iximaz: "How come Percy gets new thongs, anyway?" said one of the twins.
"Because he's a prefect," said their mother fondly.
Scapegrace: I think my favourite part of CoS is when Harry and Ron fly to Hogwarts in the Flying Ford Thonglia.
Iximaz: Ron had taken out a lumpy package and unwrapped it. There were four thongs inside.
Her eyes lingered for a moment on Neville's thong, which was fastened under his left ear, and on Ron's smudged nose.
Scapegrace: "Thongbeer? That's not strong stuff," said Ron.
"'Tis strong for a House Elf."
GoodModAddict: This state-of-the-art racing thong sports a streamlined, superfine strap of silk, treated with a flexible polish and hand-numbered with its own registration number. Each individually selected silk strand in the thong has been honed to aerodynamic perfection, giving the Thongbolt unsurpassable comfort and pinpoint precision. The Thongbolt has an acceleration of 150 miles an hour in ten seconds and incorporates an unbreakable Braking Charm. Price on request.
Iximaz: A lamp flickered on. It was Hermione Granger, wearing a pink thong and a frown.
GoodModAddict: Hagrid strode over to Harry, grabbed his arm, and pulled him to the thong.
Iximaz: He pushed the door ajar and peered inside—and a horrible scene met his eyes.
Snape and Filch were inside, alone. Snape was holding his robes above his knees. One of his legs was bloody and mangled. Filch was handing Snape thongs.
GoodModAddict: Draco cast Thongfire in the Room of Requirement.
Iximaz: Ron dived at Malfoy just as Snape came up the stairs.
"WEASLEY!"
Ron let go of the front of Malfoy's thong.
Iximaz: "I—don't—want—" said Percy thickly, as the twins forced the thong over his head, knocking his glasses askew.
GoodModAddict: "Mr. Malfoy then saw an extraordinary apparition. Can you imagine what it might have been, Potter?"
"No," said Harry, now trying to sound innocently curious.
"It was your thong, Potter. Floating in midair."
There was a long silence.
"Maybe he'd better go to Madame Pomfrey," said Harry. "If he's seeing thongs like--"
"What would your thong be doing in Hogsmeade, Potter?" said Snape softly. "Your thong is not allowed in Hogsmeade. No part of your body is allowed in Hogsmeade."
"I know that," said Harry, striving to keep his face free of guilt or fear. "It sounds like Malfoy's having hallucin--"
"Malfoy is not having hallucinations," snarled Snape, and he bent down, a hand on each side of Harry's thong, so that their faces were a foot apart. "If your thong was in Hogsmeade, so was the rest of you."
Mister Shoebox: "Thong me, Wormtail." Lord Voldemort had risen again.
Mister Shoebox: "I am not worried, Harry," said Dumbledore, his voice a little stronger despite the freezing thong. "I am with you.”
CodeCom: One morning in mid-December, Hogwarts woke to find itself covered in several feet of thongs.
Mister Shoebox: "Of course it is happening inside your thong, Harry, but why on Earth should that mean it is not real?"
Mister Shoebox: "We're not going to use thongs?!" Ron ejaculated loudly.
(( Ed: The dialogue tag is Rowling's ))
Mister Shoebox: “To the well-organized thong, death is but the next great adventure.”
Mister Shoebox: This doesn't have anything to do with thongs, but it is a zinger. “Just because you have the emotional range of a teaspoon doesn’t mean we all have.” - Hermione Granger, Phoenix. My response - "I mean, I did for four movies, but I outgrew it!"
Mister Shoebox: “Thongs are in my not-so-humble opinion, the most inexhaustible form of magic we have, capable both of inflicting injury and remedying it.”
Mister Shoebox: Harry witnessed Professor McGonagall walking right past Peeves who was determinedly loosening a crystal thong and he could have sworn he heard her tell the poltergiest "It unscrews the other way."
Mister Shoebox: "Oh, these people's minds work in strange ways, Petunia, they're not like you and me," said Uncle Vernon, trying to knock in a thong with the piece of fruitcake Aunt Petunia had just brought him.
GoodModAddict: To the Dark Lord
I know I will be dead long before you read this but I want you to know that it was I who discovered your secret. I have stolen the real thong and intend to wear it as soon as I can. I face death in the hope that when you meet your match, you will be mortal once more. R.A.B.
GoodModAddict: "Speak to me, Slytherin, greatest of the Hogwarts Thongs!"
(( Ed: That's that. Feel free to add some more stuff, since this is meant to spark further discussion and that would do it. - Tomash )) -
Oh. Oh dear. by
on 2018-01-11 23:55:00 UTC
Link to this
Oh dear. On second thought, I wonder if I should avoid the Discord server, just to keep my sanity...
-Twistey
(Thongs can be found even in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.)
-
Badfic thread! by
on 2018-01-08 20:22:00 UTC
Link to this
So, I've been torturing the Discord for a while with a particularly nasty piece of bad slashfic and I've been told I should post it here. I think it would be a good idea to start a new badfic thread anyway, to see if other people have things worth adding to the Unclaimed Badfic page.
Link to the fic (NSFW)
Fic title and Author: Professor Legolas by Joxie
Canons: Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings
Major charges include:
- Warping Harry Potter, Severus Snape, Lucius Malfoy, Gandalf, Glorfindel, Galadriel, and many others out of character
- Giving Legolas a personal portal to and from Middle-earth
- Giving Harry Potter a Veela "inheritance", complete with a soul bond to Legolas, utterly disregarding various aspects of canon Veela in the process
- Confusing physical intimacy with romantic love, and using the former to save the life of at least one character through a bond
- Making Harry Potter a descendant of Aragorn and Arwen
- Creating seven Sue artifacts in the form of "amulets." Four belong to Elrond, Glorfindel, Legolas, and Celeborn; the rest are in control of Gandalf, who gives one to Harry
- Turning Harry into an elf halfway through the fic
- Severing at least two Harry Potter wizards from their magical ability entirely
- Making Galadriel a Veela.
Summary: Legolas is made Defense Against the Dark Arts professor at Hogwarts by Headmaster Snape after the Second Wizarding War. In the fic, Ron and Ginny are dead after deciding to serve Voldemort in the war, while Draco and Lucius decided to help Harry. Harry quickly falls in love with Legolas and then comes into his Veela inheritance, which starts a "mate or die" plot that quickly gets resolved. Lucius manages to follow Legolas through his personal portal to M-e and eventually gets into a relationship with an extremely abusive Glorfindel.
Later, Lucius attempts to kill Harry and Legolas (through his soul bond) while disguised as Haldir. The only thing that stops Harry and Legolas from killing Haldir is that he's found to already be dead. Meanwhile, Glorfindel helps Lucius Malfoy end his own life to escape punishment at Harry's hand. Haldir's family demands compensation for the "blood debt", and is satisfied when Draco Malfoy is forcibly bonded to Glorfindel. It is notable that Glorfindel also gains control of precisely how and when Draco can use his magic; he promptly uses this ability to cut Malfoy off from his magic entirely.
Harry and Draco have a conversation about their abusive fathers (both of whom are shown to be far worse than they are in canon) and Gandalf offers both of them the gift of becoming Elves at the cost of their ability to perform magic. At that point, Galadriel senses Harry's immense power as a Veela and gets into a fight with him, both in their Veela forms. Draco is caught in the crossfire and dies an extremely dramatic death, and Elrond holds a Council to decide what to do with the situation. Harry manages to convince everyone present to banish Galadriel from Middle-earth until his death before accepting the Valar's gift of becoming an Elf.
This summarizes the first 18 chapters. The fic is 41 chapters long. I'm sorry for not reading the entire fic before reporting it, but I think that I've seen enough of it to say it's worth sporking. -
Harry Potter Badfic. by
on 2018-02-06 23:17:00 UTC
Link to this
It's called Sophia Black, and it's pretty bad. Not as bad as most of the fics on this thread, but bad. It's basically just an OC daughter of Sirius Black who exists solely to be a love interest for Fred Weasley. There was a subplot about her writing her father letters in Azkaban, which I followed for a while before realizing it was just an excuse for her to cry on someone's shoulders. (I forget who; I haven't read this fic in a while.) Sophia also takes Alicia Spinnet's place on the Quidditch team, and Alicia is obsessed with Fred, giving him a love potion to get him away from Sophia. I'm 65% sure she had to cure him with true love's kiss, but that might've been something else. I haven't read the story in a while, and i'm not doing it again.
Here's the link: https://www.quotev.com/story/3880293/Sophia-Black -
Merlin's beard, why. by
on 2018-01-12 17:20:00 UTC
Link to this
Anyway, I don't go hunting for badfic since I need my sanity for college, but I do have a list of all the stinkers I took off the Unclaimed list the last time I did an epic cleanup. Let's see what that has to offer...
https://www.quotev.com/story/2838998/No-Safe-Place-Legolas-Love-Story Classic second-daughter-of-Elrond Legomance, except this one has special powers and her dad's been keeping her hidden from the rest of Rivendell--excuse me, "Rivendale"--for presumably that reason. Also she joins the Fellowship because of course she does.
https://www.fanfiction.net/s/10669101/1/The-Roamer Immortal spy chick who used to be human, minis all over the place, but some bonus points for knowing that Morgoth exists.
https://www.fanfiction.net/s/7454917/1/Magic-by-the-Starlight Harry Potter/Star Trek TOS. I'll just include DawnFire's notes on the subject: "The language is awful. The Sue is evil in an overblown manner, and is put in Hufflepuff by the Hat for no discernible reason. The Hat itself—I can't even. Gratuitous Drarry. An overly-Scottish Scotty who says 'aye' far too often and is, of all things, the DADA teacher. Also, an absolutely enormous number of AVPM/AVPS references. May be a My Immortal parody, too. [...] After reading the two new chapters, I'm almost 100% positive that it's a parody. It's too intelligently written to be real. It's deliberately bad, references fanfic tropes, and seems to be going through a checklist of badfic traits. Also, if you look at the profile, the SPaG is perfect. That combined with a screenname containing the words 'bloody tears'... well, if it's not a parody/trollfic I'll eat my hat, that's all I'm saying."
https://www.quotev.com/story/4499505/Now-she-is-gone Ohhhhh my Lord, where do I even begin? She's Frerin's daughter--by an OC elf of all things--runs away from home after he dies (so presumably just before the Company sets out), and then finds herself in Mirkwood along the way because of course she does. -
Trek crossover, you say? by
on 2018-01-13 19:52:00 UTC
Link to this
I can't take on another mission right now... and I dunno about taking an obvious My Immortal retread at all... but all the same, it's hard to find sufficiently awful crossovers so squarely in my wheelhouse.
So, maybe. But I won't cry if someone else really wants it.
~Neshomeh -
Okay, I'm taking the first one. by
on 2018-01-13 18:52:00 UTC
Link to this
For one thing, at the very least it's mixing Grelvish and Sindarin (or maybe it's completely Grelvish--I don't think so, but I still need to go looking. 'Amin mela lle' is most assuredly Grelvish, though).
More hilariously, of course, is that she's the last Elf-witch ahahaha. I needed that laugh. Also, Celebrian (unless her mother is someone else and I missed it) was murdered...by Suron.
I'm sure the writer had fun with this. I, too, will have fun with this :D
~Z -
Oh dear. Well then, that's weird. by
on 2018-01-12 00:39:00 UTC
Link to this
I'll add some badfic to the thread if I see anything. Hang on, do you guys spork Creepypastas? They seem to be a bit different from other fanfic in that the ones that are actually fanfic (Lost Episode pastas, Weird Things My Game Did pastas, etc.) tend to be less story-like (haphazard plots, not too much involvement of canons, etc.) I was going to search for some to see if I could find anything, but then I realized that about the nature of the genre. Any thoughts?
-Twistey -
More badfics (all NSFW and NSFB) by
on 2018-01-09 07:01:00 UTC
Link to this
The first badfic (archiveofourown.org/works/8451553/chapters/19362307) is "Futa Prison" by Damien_Kova. Just looking at the tags, I see charges for transgender fetishization and rape. I also see multiple characters with the same family name in an explicit fic, and a skimming through the text confirmed an incest charge. While I don't know any of the involved continua other that Persona 5 well enough to evaluate characterization or canon compliance, the writing appears to be of low quality, featuring awkward phrasing and several technical errors. I'd appreciate if someone familiar with RWBY (which is the most heavily involved fandom) could confirm that this is indeed awful.
The second one (archiveofourown.org/works/6408871/chapters/14671612) is "Meant to Be" by Waterrain. The main charges here are ultra beige prose (does the PPC have a term for when the prose goes beyond beige, like urple prose for when the opposite happens?), mangling of characterization and sibling relationships (the incest is, unfortunately, possible in canon and thus not charge worthy), and mpreg according to the tags.
The last two (archiveofourown.org/series/543514) are a series entitled "takumeme gets cummies from big dragon" by xXM0n0chromeNimbusXx. Featuring beige prose, transgender fetishization, bad characterization, anatomically impossible sex, and impossible anatomy in general (remember that archers tend to have very muscular arms), this fic is basically just poorly written smut. The incest is, once again, possible in game, so it isn't chargeworthy, but everything else still is. -
I... I might take that last one. by
on 2018-01-12 15:56:00 UTC
Link to this
Namely because: 1) I needed an excuse for at least one of my agents to reveal knowledge of the Fire Emblem series; 2) mishandling of transgender issues is something I've been meaning to tackle at some point; and 3) oh dear god the general CRINGE. I haven't handled that many NSFW/NSFB badfics in a while, so I might as well rectify that in preparation for that big thing I'm planning for my Floaters team.
...why must I make my PPC self-insert suffer so much? X'D
Also, here are two badfics which I also plan to deal with in the future:
- "A Pirates[sic] Life For Me" - Ice Age - T-rated
A wild girl in the forest, haves an dream to became an pirate! But when she turns into one, its the worst thing she ever did! Buck is back and the pirate's survived? EllieXManny and DiegoXSiera ofcourse!
A Spellcheck Scrat right in the fic description, beige prose, poor grammar, and a human protagonist with a strange name (by tribal human standards) AND CAN TALK WITH ANIMALS! WHAT THE FLOCK?!
- Two Fractured Halves - My Hero Academia - M-rated
AU in which Izuku has a dormant quirk that only awakens when he takes a leap of bridge with the intent of ending his life after Kacchan pushed him to far and when all might said the thing he feared most and that was all it took to bring Izuku to the bridge that fateful night. Soulmate AU too, Izuku is OOC sometimes and OP. First Fanfic! Constructive Criticism is welcome.
Description says it all. The introductory chapter even gives a full list of abilities provided by Izuku's "quirk", which is way too many for a single quirk by the manga/anime's standards. Also ew. Just. Ew. -
It's all yours (nm) by
on 2018-01-15 03:08:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Oh god, no. by
on 2018-01-09 15:26:00 UTC
Link to this
You're right, Futa Prison is horrible, and completely messed up the characters from RWBY. It might as well have used completely original characters. It also ruined Kill La Kill, SnK, and Fairy Tail, and I assume it will ruin Bleach and One piece at some point, since those are tagged.
-
Mission: Agony in Pink (Complete) by
on 2018-01-09 04:46:00 UTC
Link to this
Members of the PPC, it is finished. The Legendary Badfic "Agony in Pink" has been sporked. Let the history books note this triumph!
Ahem. Anyway, here you are:
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Aftermath
Author's Note
Any comments shall be passed on to JulyFlame, the author of the piece. Please enjoy, and share your thoughts.
PC -
*Tumultuous applause* by
on 2018-01-22 18:33:00 UTC
Link to this
I was going to respond to this sooner, but real life had other ideas, and apparently everyone else has said what I wanted to say already. I know that the circumstances behind July's departure were unbelievably disgusting, and I was very worried that her leaving would mean that this mission would never be completed, but I'm glad that it wasn't the case after all and that her closure has been on a very high note, especially given the slaying of such a notorious badfic as this one.
Farewell, July, wherever you are. May you live long and prosper no matter where the four winds take you in the future and beyond. *salutes* -
I didnÂ’t believe that this abomination can be PPCed. by
on 2018-01-22 10:27:00 UTC
Link to this
But this is great. Bravo!
I may have spotted a tiny error in Part One:
I think I might have accidentally on purposely sold myself to the US military...
I guess this should either read "accidentally on purpose" or "accidentally or purposely", but I’m not sure whether this is the sleep deprivation or the caffeine talking, or an actual typo.
HG -
Much-delayed review (spoilers) by
on 2018-01-18 18:50:00 UTC
Link to this
Spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad spoiler pad
Reactions while reading:
- I like the rather vague opening
- The bit set on th ship does a good job of giving me the feeling of the place and what it's like there
- "Paint chip in both my eyes." is an excuse I haven't heard before. (and getting called on it made it rather funny)
- Cal and July missing each other is touching
- Guess-the-fic was a nice unusual thing that could happen because of the framing ... and now I want to know about the one with Colonel Sanders
- The Flowers using "not the actual trunk of the matter" and such makes sense and is a nice touch
- The "I want to get paid for this" moment was really funny for some reason
- July has evidently not quite learned to never again volunteer herself
- From what little I know about Power Rangers, they're in teams of six, right? Which is why having four more people makes sense
- I wonder what July got in DoSAT (if anything). If there was something, I suspect it'll be quite plot-relevant later
- Silas is right to be concerned, given how Legendaries go
- At least he was smart enough to stay out of it
- You'd better give Ilraen his partner back in one piece
- Nume hiding in the cafeteria makes sense
- Did the narration just do a doge meme?
- Why's July picking fights in the cafeteria? (or is she?)
- The veteran agents leaving to find better seating makes sense
- Ah, sneaking in during the chaos
- ... trafficking Luxury onto a Navy ship. Heh. If that succeeded, I suspect productivity would grind to a halt within hours. Maybe minutes.
- "Frell U" sounds like a coffee mug Nume would have
- Ok, so the backup is going to DoSAT to get ready to do something
- There's no way that box isn't plot-relevant later
- And I do wonder who the surprise cameos are
- The fic giving off a general sense of wrongness makes sense
- I'm not following the trousers/dress bit too well
- That was a fast CAD melt
- The fic wrapping itself around the canon so tightly you can't see the Words much is something I haven't seen before, and gives a good reason to not actually show us much of it
- "very serious military environment" yeah right
- Riffing the author's note gives me a sense of what's there without showing it and ... did this fic seriously get banned in Australia?
- chuckles at pronouncing the slash in "and/or"
- July, please stop trying to summon the Department of Redundancy Department (although I'm getting the sense they have a standing invitation to said powerpoints)
- "Isn't that piracy?" "Arr" was a good line
- I hope the fic doesn't know the agents are here either, and now hat it got pointed out ...
- Corny jokes are probably a better approach than trying to comprehend the horror of it all
- I wonder if they'll be able to make it to the youth center
- Standard mission-y pointing out bad stuff goes here, without showing much of the fic.
- I'm with July. That Tortura thing is bad and also that was a really freaky scene change
- That narration about the Pink Ranger is pretty creepy
- Well, now that the plan hasn't been spelled out on screen, it'll work ... I hope
- Ok, wait, it is specified. That's a good plan, which will inevitably go horribly wrong now that I, the reader, know what it is.
- Welp. The weird torturer thing was immune to bullets. At least they got through the portal and ... there's still two parts left. Oh dear.
- Ok, so part 3, well, that was a very gripping fight scene so I was too busy reading it to go back and react. The flashbacks worked well. And the Dark Ranger was really creepy. I also liked the "you're a hero" speech the Pink Ranger got near the end
- The departure bits were nice
- The meeting in part four is a nice thing, and I'm liking the details about the minor effects that happened, like Daffyd keeping his Zoid and Trojie stealing a bunch of Disc stuff
- That was a nice twist on July getting paid, and it's a shame she's not getting any medals
- The "moving on" conversation was good
- Heh. Books in the over. Nice call-back to the earlier domesticity conversation.
- It's nice that July and Cal will have some sort of relationship going despite going their own ways
- I wasn't expecting another person on the ship to be ex-PPC. Or for there to be plotholes in the ocean.
- Navigating a ship out of a plothole without anyone noticing does sound tough.
- The various scenarios the ship could've gotten in to were a nice touch.
- Now I do want to know who that navigator is.
General review: I really liked this. One of my favorite parts was how Checkov's gun was loaded a good few times in ways that left me expecting that something would get pulled out later, but without much of an idea of what is was. This made all the appearances (Zoidz, Daffyd, etc.) surprising but in a way that didn't feel like they'd been pulled out of nowhere.
I also think that was a nice, unusual way to take down the fic, and from what I can tell it was canon-appropriate. You had me really worried at the end of part 2 that "no casualties" wouldn't happen (that is, good job building up the tension).
The whole mission also had plenty of silly moments, which is appropriate for the setting.
One complaint is that not much of the mission was spent on actually sporking the fic, but I don't think there were many viable ways to do that with a straight-up piece of torture porn.
- Tomash -
*applause* (nm) by
on 2018-01-16 00:02:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Re: Part 1 (spoilers) by
on 2018-01-12 10:01:00 UTC
Link to this
So I just finished reading Part 1, and I'm so glad I finally got the chance to do it.
(spoiler block goes here there and everywhere spoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywherespoiler block goes here there and everywhere)
Right, that's probably more than enough.
Anyway, yeah, I'm really enjoying this so far.
Favorite part: July stepping back into the PPC. That was amazing.
Favorite line: "I quit the PPC. It doesn't mean I quit her." Seriously, I love that line. It's wonderful.
And nice hook at the end with Library! We don't know who she convinced, and we don't know what's in the white box July gave her, and...well, it's a good hook for wanting to read on.
All in all: enjoyed it a lot, both writing style and content (and Ilraen's cameo!) Looking forward to reading more.
~Z -
Re: mission (spoilers) by
on 2018-01-11 12:48:00 UTC
Link to this
A GOOD MISSION THE BEST MISSION
Ahem.
I've gotten peeks at this at various stages of its writing process. It really is a beautiful thing, seeing it all put together and fancy now. In no particular order:
The treatment of the original fic-as-legendary is unigue, but subtle; the pall of off-ness in the surroundings in part two gets across the idea that something is wrong with everything without being overly dramatic or giving air time to actual torture porn itself.
The choices of color and creature for the PPC Zords are so spot-on and wonderful, and I love that the mission essentially follows the format of a Mighty Morphin' episode. But I love that bringing giant robots into the mission wasn't enough on its own—that the agents needed a canon character, especially the one the fic was trying to attack, to put in the really decisive victory. Kimberley's speech against the dark ranger is perfect and wonderful, and I feel like the character deserved to give such a speech, both in this fic and in general. And I loved that Bulk and Skull got a cameo at the end, not only for the fun of it, but because the characters who were always the silliest part of the show make an excellent counter to the serious, angsty subject matter of "Agony in Pink." (And their theme song played in my head of its own volition.)
The cameos from veterans of legendary missions past are excellent. It makes for a great love letter to July's history with the PPC, and the teamwork aspect stands as a thematic contrast to the singling-out selfish wish fulfillment in the original badfic.
The goodbyes at the end, especially the one between Agent!July and Library feel so sad for me, but at the same time, July kept a note of hope in there, too. The parallel is clear: that the friendships between us are bigger than the PPC, and can continue even as people drift away from the community. Same goes for seaman!July using her PPC knowledge in her future career; I don't think any of us ever truly stop being PPC, and the knowledge and wisdom we gain in this community stick with us as we move forward and grow.
This mission is beautiful. This is the PPC, both in-universe, and the community. Thank you, July, for giving us this brilliant piece!
Go, go, Plot Protectors!
—doctorlit -
... Whoa. by
on 2018-01-10 21:44:00 UTC
Link to this
I have nothing else to say. Just... Wow. This is amazing.
-
That. Was. Awesome. by
on 2018-01-10 08:35:00 UTC
Link to this
I don't know how much weigth it can carry, but I sincerly regret July's departure from PPC. For the really messy way it went, for not trying to discuss more with her and many people leving here, both for the interactions and the writing advices, and, well for the excellent missions like this one was. I really hope she gets to keep on the writing beyond the PPC, making this one the last hurrah would just be a damn shame. But, like she said, moving backwards wouldn't do.
Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers.
Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers.
Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers.
Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers. Here are spoilers.
As far as telling new things about how awesome that mission was for me, there was something darkly meta with the Dark Ranger babbling about making Kimberly 'legendary'. The fact she was the one to make the win possible is also something really cool, and I guess meta too, since that's canon literally fighting back and winning.
I also chuckled with the last jab from the Flowers for the salary, and liked the reference to past agents. And, I'm now really curious about this Navigator. I just can't help it, mysteries like Huinesoron mentionned only leave me hungry for more.
Also a very last thing. We can't have a Power Rangers sporking without an appropriate theme running on for the final. Come on, if you didn't think about it, you never heard it before. And it's just perfect to listen to during Act 3. Dragonforce too, that said. -
OIIIIIIII! by
on 2018-01-10 07:01:00 UTC
Link to this
I love this! I've wanted to see this PPC'd for a long time!
-
Bravo! Bravo! (Semi spoilery) by
on 2018-01-09 21:36:00 UTC
Link to this
I've heard of this fic, but was never brave enough to take a look... as a Power Rangers fan, it's great to see someone finally take it down!
And it was nice to see the returning Agents helping out with this. And the giant Zord battle was pretty awesome too! -
/Standing Ovation. Just. Standing Ovation/ (nm) by
on 2018-01-09 19:49:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I love this mission (non-spoiler review). by
on 2018-01-09 11:36:00 UTC
Link to this
As July says, I beta'd it, so I've been watching Part 3 in particular for a long time, but it's been ages since I went back and read the whole thing end to end. And... I love it. Part One showcases everything that is best about the world of the PPC, and starts building up the anticipation for the denument. Part Two builds the tension up to spectacular levels - and Part Three delivers. Oh, how it delivers. This is the most creative finale to a PPC mission that I remember reading, and I've been here since '03, so that's saying a lot.
Read this mission. Read it unspoiled. You are missing out if you don't.
hS -
I've only read Part 1 so far... by
on 2018-01-09 16:43:00 UTC
Link to this
But all the yes.
The tone and the setup is just... fun.
This is a mission that reminded me why I was drawn here to begin with. -
Having finished... EEEEEEEEEEEEEE! (Spoilers) by
on 2018-01-09 23:16:00 UTC
Link to this
I've been around the PPC since... Jeez. A while now. Not on the board, not in the community, but reading missions at the very least.
As I said back after reading Part 1, this took me back. Back to the just straight-up FUN of some of the earliest missions I read. About half-bored, half-insane agents rocking out to heavy metal to distract themselves from agonizing fics as they tried to keep what was left of their sanity. This isn't a grim mission, or a bleak mission. It brought back both nostalgia and a genuine sense of joy at just how silly it was. It felt like the mission was enjoying itself, and I couldn't help but join in the fun.
The fact that it features Trojie and Dafydd (two of my all-time favorite agents) as well as a collection of other PPC legends really doesn't hurt either. -
Seconding every bit of this. by
on 2018-01-09 16:36:00 UTC
Link to this
And the spoilery one, too.
July makes PPCing a godawful NSFW Legendary fun. I can think of no higher praise than that. It was a pleasure to help bring this along, and I'm proud to have been a part of it.
~Neshomeh -
And now the spoilery version. by
on 2018-01-09 11:37:00 UTC
Link to this
This review contains spoilers. You should not read it, or even click on it, without reading the mission first. Seriously. It's an amazing mission, and you shouldn't spoil it for yourself by reading my ramblings before you get to it.
~
~
~
Part One is a wonderful exploration both of July's return to HQ and the Flowers' dealings with Agony in Pink (and Legendaries as a whole), then turns into the glorious Cafeteria romp. The whole section is stuffed with foreshadowing for Part Three, which definitely rewards rereading once you know what's coming.
Part Two does a marvellous job of gradually establishing just how tough the fic is going to be to kill, but is also a quality mission. I've always preferred reports that don't linger on the NSFW parts of badfics - my Clbr__n mission is the same - and although it's short, it didn't need to be longer. It establishes what's bad about the fic, shows us enough that we feel it, introduces the players for Part Three - and then isn't afraid to move on.
As for Part Three... in the original outline (I said I'd been watching this for a long time), July introduced this section with the line And then... Go Go Canon Rangers!. It grabbed me by the fannishness and has never let go. I love the escalation over the course of the fight; I have to particularly highlight "I think we're about to find out what happens when a badfic fights back," which stands as a mission statement for the mission that is spectacularly fulfilled.
Reading over this, and Dafydd's interactions, takes me back to the process of writing it. I tweaked a lot of what he says and does, but the core of it is straight from July. (Though I will claim Ambalenar Atsordë! all for my own - ambale-nar is Quenya for 'fiery yellowhammer', while atsordë is a phonetic Quenyification of 'Zord').
The Dark Ranger is a perfect payoff to the setup in Part Two, and July was absolutely right to let Kimberly fight it. Some demons, you have to fight by yourself.
The Aftermath is a perfect ending: bittersweet levied with humour. I still have no idea who the Navigator is, but I guess some mysteries don't need to be answered.
I love this mission. It is a perfect farewell, one of the best I have ever read, and the only one that inspired me to create fanart:
Thank you, July, and safe voyaging.
hS