As some of you know, I was brutally mauled by plotbunnies a few weeks ago and have been on something of a Skyrim writing binge (alternative links). Well, the story that started it all is done at about 16,000 words (~30 pages), and I would like to make sure it doesn't suck before putting it out to the Internet at large. I haven't written anything with a plot that wasn't PPC-related in a long time, so I am feeling a tad insecure. ^_^;
My ideal beta would be fairly familiar with TES lore, since I'm not, and though I've done a fair bit of research, there's always a chance that I missed something relevant. Failing that, the story takes place on Solstheim after the main quest of the Dragonborn expansion, so familiarity with all that would be helpful. Failing that, if you don't mind reading a fic in a setting you don't know, I would be interested to know how approachable the story is to someone who hasn't played the games. I don't want to tediously tell fans what they already know, but I also don't want to leave out the kind of descriptive detail that anyone should expect from a good adventure story. {= )
I'm not looking for SPaG checks (though that's always good) so much as feedback about flow, pacing, theme, characterization, fight choreography, etc.: what works, what doesn't, why, and how it could be better.
There are spoilers for the Dragonborn main quest and the side quests "Filial Bonds" and "Retaking Thirsk"; also the Skyrim Companions questline. Oh, and the conclusion of the main quest, but it's not like y'all don't know the PC wins in the end, right?
If you didn't... um... sorry? >.>;
~Neshomeh
-
Seeking a beta or two for a Skyrim fic. by
on 2017-03-11 03:17:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Aaand that's enough. {= ) (nm) by
on 2017-03-11 15:06:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I'd like to take a look. by
on 2017-03-11 10:00:00 UTC
Link to this
However my Masters degree is taking up a large chunk of my life at the moment, so I don't know how much free time I'd be able to dedicate to it.
-
No worries. by
on 2017-03-11 15:06:00 UTC
Link to this
I have enough people now, but maybe next time. Thanks!
~Neshomeh -
Gimme. by
on 2017-03-11 05:00:00 UTC
Link to this
This is something I need in my life. I wrote an analytical essay on Skyrim fairly recently. And TES:V is one of my favorite games, ever. I would love to read it.
-
Well, I can't argue with that. {= ) by
on 2017-03-11 15:01:00 UTC
Link to this
I'll just need your e-mail address so I can invite you to the Gdoc. Or, if you prefer to work offline, I can send you the file, too. (.odt or .doc?)
Welcome, by the way!
~Neshomeh -
Email by
on 2017-03-11 16:56:00 UTC
Link to this
maxewellgaming@gmail.com
Pretty original, huh? -
Thanks! (nm) by
on 2017-03-11 17:15:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I could take a look at it by
on 2017-03-11 04:16:00 UTC
Link to this
Though I personally never played Dragonborn, I have thoroughly played through the rest of Skyrim and am fairly familiar with TES at large.
-
Thanks for the offer. by
on 2017-03-11 15:04:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm gonna let Maxewell have this one, though, since he's so enthusiastic about it. I had another person volunteer off-Board, so I have enough now. Maybe next time? I'm planning to go back to Skyrim for other stories with my DB. {= )
~Neshomeh
-
Yo dawgs, I heard you liked newbies. by
on 2017-03-12 06:20:00 UTC
Link to this
Hi people! Longtime lurker here, decided to introduce myself!
Currently reading: Cosmere, anything Forgotten realms.
Queetion: Does anone here kniw a legal source for cheap pdf of Forgotten Realms sourcebooks? Dm's guild doesn't have some of the ones I'm looking for (TSR). Right now i've been relying on piracy, which is rather unethical, as i want to contribute money so wizards creates more FR product but don't want to have to deal with shipping and transport for physical gamebooks. -
We sure like newbies... Especially well cooked ones. by
on 2017-03-13 21:31:00 UTC
Link to this
Ehuh, sorry. Please accept this blac-hole chocolate and my welcome.
-
Welcome aBoard! by
on 2017-03-13 02:08:00 UTC
Link to this
Have one of my own shed feathers and a complimentary kit of Spikes!
-
*Waves hi to newbie from Krynn* by
on 2017-03-12 22:01:00 UTC
Link to this
Welcome, welcome, welcome!
Since I am unfortunately not from the Forgotten Realms fandom, I gift you with my full set of Dragonlance novels (main storyline only) with limited edition urple and wilver illustrations.
And since this is the PPC, I calmly remind you to forget about that irritating thing known as sanity.
P.S. Check out the Shipfest, and maybe even participate. -
Cosmere! by
on 2017-03-12 21:00:00 UTC
Link to this
Eee, another Brandon Sanderson fan! Nice to meet you! I'm Alleb, but you can call me Alleb. In the spirit of the Cosmere, I give to you a bead of lerasium. Don't pay any attention to the urple color. Have fun being Mistborn!
-Alleb -
Re: Cosmere! by
on 2017-03-13 13:25:00 UTC
Link to this
Thanks! Xure itll come in useful.
-
Welcome, Hope You Have a Good Time! (nm) by
on 2017-03-12 19:03:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Welcome! (nm) by
on 2017-03-12 18:42:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Hello there! by
on 2017-03-12 18:04:00 UTC
Link to this
Welcome aBoard! Have this piece of a capital ship. That crashed into a planet at interplanetary speeds. It's a shapeless blob of metal. ... Yeah.
-
Bark bark! by
on 2017-03-12 09:29:00 UTC
Link to this
Barkbark bark! Bark bark barkbark! Woof!
(Hello there, human! I am a dawg and I like humans very much and I like newbie-humans very muchest!)
Bark bark borf borf barkbark ruff!
(Welcome to the PPC! You excited lots of other dawgs when you said 'Cosmere' but I'm a dawg and I don't even know what that means! I perceive everything as a different type and size of bone!)
Borf borf bark woof, pantpantpant, bark bark!
(My gift upon you is: a dawgbowl! So you can feed us! Please feed us!)
Borfborfborfborfborfborf woof borfborf bark bark borfborfborfborfborfborf!
(Welcome!) -
Welcome, welcome! by
on 2017-03-12 08:13:00 UTC
Link to this
Glad to have you, fellow lurker! Come on in, grab a seat by the fire, and leave your sanity at the door!
Here, take this Replica Holocron and a Mallorn tree Feather token as newbie gifts. Pardon the dust on the Holocron, I've been out of the newbie welcoming game a while.
Forgotten Realms, hmm? Any Particular novels? The only ones I really read were Year of Rogue Dragons and The Brotherhood of the Griffon, but both were excellent series. I should really finish them one of theses days...
Anyway, good to have you aBoard. Hope you enjoy yourself. -
So sad that they are no longer publishing novels. by
on 2017-03-12 08:46:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm on the brimstone angels series. So depressing that wizards has axed the forgotten realms novel line.
-
Newbie! *glomp* *poke* by
on 2017-03-12 06:29:00 UTC
Link to this
Hello, and welcome aBoard! For your newbie gift, take this plate of freshly-made SPaGhetti!
If you haven't yet read them, may I point you towards the Original Series and the Constitution? They're pretty much the only required reading around these parts. Another useful resource you might use is the Wiki; if you have any questions, just look here before asking. We like it when newbies do the research. ;)
Lastly, have an invite to our Discord channel (where the Constitution does still apply).
(Unfortunately, I buy all my D&D books as hardbound from Amazon, so I'm not much help here.)
Hope you stick around for a while! -
thanks! by
on 2017-03-12 06:50:00 UTC
Link to this
Ive already read most of that stuff on the ppc wiki. I'm just reading all the stuff in the fr biblio from candlekeep. The ebooks are available on kindle so no worries there, but i'm interested int he sourcebooks right now and dmsguild doesn't have all of them. *sigh* looks like i can't get them legit as i don't have money for shipping used hardbacks internationally. It'd be better if my hobby was crack cocaine.
I'm sure its delicious!
-
Behold, Agent Alleb as you have never seen her before! by
on 2017-03-13 02:49:00 UTC
Link to this
So my sister-in-law (she posted once under the name of Basil) is an excellent artist, and I thought I'd ask her to draw Agent Alleb for me.
I am so glad I did.
Look at her! Ah! I'm still not over how awesome she looks! Aaaah!
-Alleb, fangirling -
So cool! :D (nm) by
on 2017-03-15 15:14:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Nice! by
on 2017-03-14 15:06:00 UTC
Link to this
I particularly like the use of the vibrant blue for her tunic - images done solely in the red-green half of the spectrum tend to look fairly samey to me (red-green colourblind, which may be why), so it's always pleasant to have something that pops out.
I agree with Zingenmir about the bracers, too - they look like they're based on something with extremely large scales, or possibly on pinecones. Nice.
hS -
YOOOOOOOOOOOO (nm) by
on 2017-03-14 14:30:00 UTC
Link to this
-
That is AWESOME! (nm) by
on 2017-03-14 14:22:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Oh my goodness. by
on 2017-03-14 00:04:00 UTC
Link to this
I vaguely remember Basil's name, and this is *excellent*. I think I'd been picturing Agent Alleb as a little younger and with a slightly different face (rounder, not as pointed at the chin), but...wow. This is really, really good! I love the detail and I love how real it looks and yes. Yes, this is very good. And the various leather straps intrigue me.
~Zing
PS: Also, the gauntlets. Those are nice gauntlets. I keep seeing new things when I look back. -
Agent Alleb, as I've never seen her before! by
on 2017-03-13 07:02:00 UTC
Link to this
That, there, is right brilliant!
I mean, not only is it, as a general picture, really bloody good, but it fits her perfectly. That is the exact face I'd imagine her having, and facial expression and all. Noooooice.
It fits my mental image of her perfectly! Er. In the sense that my mental image of her was girl with blonde-ish hair and muscles and pale skin. My mind is very lazy and vague with these things.
But!
But!
It still fits!
Your sister-in-law is a very good artfellow!
-
Hey, I'm a newbie! I need some help. by
on 2017-03-13 08:49:00 UTC
Link to this
Hello! I am a newbie to this interesting world of the PPC, I seem to have gotten lost on my way to finding some bets readers for a fic I started to write. Maybe I am already here, or I am in the wrong place. Can someone direct me to where I can do that please?
-
Welcome! by
on 2017-03-14 14:32:00 UTC
Link to this
It'd just be silly of me to give you an answer when you already have multiple helpful ones. In the meantime, have my warm welcome to the Board -- and a 75-pack of perfectly ordinary paperclips. They hold paper together, and they come in unassuming metal. With that said, they occasionally gravitate towards the belly fur of cats, so keep an eye on your pets. I wish you all the best here!
-
Hello newbie. by
on 2017-03-13 21:37:00 UTC
Link to this
Please have some black-hole coffee. Now, you already got several answers, so only thing left is wishing youu welcome... and asking how much you readd about the PPC, and your fandoms.
-
Fandoms... by
on 2017-03-15 08:29:00 UTC
Link to this
I've only scratched the surface of the PPC stories, starting out at the Jay and Acacia series, with lord of the rings. I have thorough knowledge of the fandoms I am involved in. One being a tv show, with others being tailored towards video games.
-
Could you name them, please? by
on 2017-03-15 19:01:00 UTC
Link to this
Them or any other one you know.
-
Oh yeah, I should of. by
on 2017-03-16 07:01:00 UTC
Link to this
From the list I have, there is: Miraculous Ladybug, The Matrix trilogy, The Harry Potter series (mostly movies), the Borderlands series, the Halo franchise, the Doom franchise, Most Disney movies from the 1990s onwards, Most Nintendo titles, Skullduggery Pleasant book series, The 39 clues series among others that I cannot think of.
-
Greetings! by
on 2017-03-13 17:36:00 UTC
Link to this
Welcome, welcome, welcome!
As your newbie gift, have a Lego Mary-Sue figure (the glitter isn't poisonous, don't worry).
Since this is the PPC, please leave your sanity at the door. -
Re: Hey, I'm a newbie! I need some help. by
on 2017-03-13 15:36:00 UTC
Link to this
Welcome! Have a pile of differently coloured pens!
-
Welcome! by
on 2017-03-13 15:16:00 UTC
Link to this
What's the fix you're working on, a PPC mission or something else? Depending on what it is I'm open to beta.
As for your newbie gift, have a test tube full of technically safe candy coated chocolates. -
Maybe I'll do both. by
on 2017-03-15 08:58:00 UTC
Link to this
I am currently trying to revive and rewrite a trans dimensional hopping fanfic, which I hope I can make it not sound like a typical Mary sue, or some other version of 'sue'.
After reading the original series of the PPC, I am thinking of doing a PPC mission. My writing skills...are not the best. -
Welcome! by
on 2017-03-13 13:20:00 UTC
Link to this
You're in the right place for finding betas, though I'd recommend getting to know the community a little more before you ask. I hope you stick around! Here's a Ravenclaw scarf and some popcorn to eat while you read the Original Series!
-
well then by
on 2017-03-13 09:29:00 UTC
Link to this
I see that my spelling for beta was accidentally changed to "bets". I am sorry for any inconvenience.
-
So long and thanks for all the fish. by
on 2017-03-16 16:10:00 UTC
Link to this
I stirred up a bit of trouble last night on the Discord in a drug-addled rage and it's since prompted me to finally move on from this mess of a community. Even if I could recover from what I did under the influence of drugs, you know what? I don't want to.
The longer I stay here, the less safe I feel. You lot talk so much about upholding the Constitution when all you do is waffle about on making any real decisions and ignore complaints of bullying or brush it off entirely unless someone more 'reputable' steps up to the plate.
When "Brink" was published, not a single one of you gave a damn about the fact that while writing it, Ekyl bullied his way into becoming a cowriter rather than a beta reader, turned the story into what he wanted, and SeaTurtle and Zingenmir didn't give a rat's ass when I told them he was making me miserable and wanted him to leave. Yeah, never mind that the incident left me with new scars on my arm and the constant niggling idea to down my entire medicine cabinet at that point. None of you cared.
Well, none of you except July, but she's got a bit of a history of being a bully, too, doesn't she? Not that you care about that, either. She's a PG. She's an oldbie. She's untouchable. "Oh, she was just tired when she started screaming at you over PM abut how you're in the habit of conspiring with Desdendelle about chasing newbies off the Board, she really is truly sorry about that". Yeah, sorry she lost her verbal punching bag, maybe. For the record, when I left the last time, I did leave because of her. I just said I didn't because 1) nothing would have come of it if I did and 2) Data Junkie would have used it as further ammunition for their ripping into July. I'm starting to think they had the right idea.
I had to start avoiding role-playing on Discord because GlarnBoudin wouldn't leave me alone, making inappropriate comments about my characters and not taking no for an answer. None of you cared about that until Tomash said something, and what was the result? "Eh, we'll ban him, maybe. Can't really be bothered to vote on this. Besides, doesn't Ix have a history of whining? Can't she shut up for once about how mean everyone is to her? God, she's so annoying."
I've just been growing more resentful and hateful of this place every single day. Bullies and bully apologists, the lot of you. The only reason I was sticking around as long as I did is because I don't have anywhere else to go. If it's this bad here, in a community that claims to be intolerant of crap like what I have to put up with, how bad is it out there?
So good-bye, PPC. I don't expect you'll care about this, either. Write it off as Iximaz being dramatic and leaving the Board again.
I hate all of you.
Good. Bye. -
I'm sorry. by
on 2017-03-17 02:55:00 UTC
Link to this
I've been withdrawing from a medication with nasty side effects like anger outbursts and hearing voices, and I posted in a moment of rage. I know that is not an excuse for what I said and I should have known better. I just hope that can at least provide an explanation for why I did what I did.
That being said, I think I should stay away for a while to let things cool down.
I'm so very deeply ashamed and can't say I'm sorry enough. -
I want to add that I've resigned modship of Discord. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 00:05:00 UTC
Link to this
-
You are forgiven by
on 2017-03-17 20:37:00 UTC
Link to this
To be honest, I didn't find any of this extremely concerning. Still, this has weighed heavily on my thoughts for the past day.
Restraint is a good trait to have in a public place. It is good to see you demonstrate that.
Thank you for your apology. -
Take care of yourself. by
on 2017-03-17 16:31:00 UTC
Link to this
I said it in a post below, but it's a bit buried, so I'll say it here, too:
Please know that your health and well-being are very important. Take whatever time you need and do whatever you need to do to feel stable before thinking you need to engage again. Like hS said, we'll be here when/if you're ready to come back.
~Neshomeh -
Hey, don't worry. by
on 2017-03-17 15:08:00 UTC
Link to this
Just take a step back for a bit, give yourself as much time as you need.
-
I think you owe some people an apology. by
on 2017-03-17 14:40:00 UTC
Link to this
You owe SeaTurtle and Zingenmir an apology for saying that they didn't give a rat's ass about your feelings.
You owe the Board-at-large an apology for calling everybody here bullies.
But most of all you owe July an apology. Even if you didn't mean to, you've set off one of the ugliest witch hunts I've seen here against a person who wasn't around when you were coming off your meds, wasn't around to defend herself against all of the accusations and mudslinging, and has zero ill intent toward you. Your actions made people consider publishing July's private conversations in public. You've basically made her feel like you're driving her away from the Board. She was unjustly scapegoated because of your feud with her. At the very least you owe her an apology. -
Calm down. by
on 2017-03-18 10:35:00 UTC
Link to this
You do realize you're demanding an apology in response to an apology? I advise that you refrain from posting until you're less angry.
-
... Your post is a reply to an apology. (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 15:46:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I think what he meant was... by
on 2017-03-17 16:17:00 UTC
Link to this
...for Ixi to not only deliver a general apology for their outburst, which they did, but also to apologize to the people they called out by name in said outburst on a more personal level. Referring to everyone else around here as bullies is one thing, but accusing several Boarders of specific, individual actions they perceived as being offensive is a different albeit related matter.
I know I'm not the foremost authority on handling instances like this, but I've dealt with tense periods like this before in multiple online communities. Based on what I do know, I feel that even if everyone accepts a general apology there are those who will still feel that the person in question has yet to address specific issues with them in particular.
Be that as it may, I accept Ixi's general apology, in part because from what little I was aware of when all this escalated I doubted that they'd had a clear head when they posted the outburst in the first place, what with the effects of their drugs and such. This acceptance comes with the caveat however that personally talking with the people whom they specifically called out would also help a great deal and is recommended as well, so that everyone who got dragged in has a role in defusing and ultimately resolving this kind of situation. -
Was about to say basically this. by
on 2017-03-17 16:26:00 UTC
Link to this
I agree, I think the people who were specifically called out deserve specific apologies.
In general, too, I feel that this community has a great deal of patience, understanding, and forgiveness in it, and I think its members deserve the same from each individual in return, especially considering the immediate, maybe even extreme reactions that take place in an attempt to make restitution and set things right every time something like this happens. We're not perfect and never will be, but I don't think you'll find a community that tries as hard as us to do right by everyone here. That must not be ignored.
That said, Iximaz, your health and well-being are very important. Please take care of yourself, take whatever time you need, and do whatever you need to do to get to a place of stability. Like hS said, we'll be here when/if you're ready to come back.
~Neshomeh -
I think something needs to be said. by
on 2017-03-17 21:34:00 UTC
Link to this
I realize that I'm hardly the least biased person here, but I do feel that something really ought to be said, and I don't really see anyone else making the case here, so here goes.
What I'm more than aware of is that Iximaz never intended to make that post. They've been susceptible to things that are both something I'm incredibly sympathetic toward and not the subject of this post, but they did predispose her toward taking an action she never would've considered while sober.
My issue, however, is that the allegations she made don't seem to have received much, if any credulity. Actions she claims had serious consequences. Why is no one taking that seriously? Why is no one considering the possibility that while she might never have come out and said anything without being under the influence, that what she's said is the truth? And why isn't anyone looking into it to find out whether or not this is the case?
It seems to me that what I'm seeing is someone who feels harassed finally snapping and asking the community at large to actually investigate the accusations, giving credence to both sides and deciding who did what. Deciding if harassment actually did take place, and ensuring that people don't feel unsafe here again.
I think that's admirable, I think that's reasonable, and I don't think that's something for which they should be made to apologize. I think it's even beneficial to the community as a whole. Iximaz is a friend to a lot of people here—why is no one listening to her? She made the accusations in an unreasonable state, but I happen to think that's because she doesn't think anyone else here will listen to her, and at the time of posting she didn't care what happened to her in the immediate future. She could finally tell the truth, and make the community aware of what she saw as Ekyl and July harassing her.
And you're asking her to apologize for that? -
This is fair: by
on 2017-03-18 09:22:00 UTC
Link to this
"It seems to me that what I'm seeing is someone who feels harassed finally snapping and asking the community at large to actually investigate the accusations, giving credence to both sides and deciding who did what."
But it's only fair to investigate what people actually did, rather than how strongly Iximaz reacted to what they did. As Neshomeh rather excellently explained here, Iximaz's reactions and choices belong to her and only her.
I think everyone involved in this fracas is genuinely trying to do the best that they know how, for their friends and for the Board. Everyone is just colliding up against each other like drifting continents.
-Kaitlyn, sad -
Some things you, more than anyone, need to understand. by
on 2017-03-18 04:23:00 UTC
Link to this
(I don't even know how to deal with everything that's come out up-Board, so I'm starting here. Good god, y'all.)
Okay, so. Aegis. I understand that you are concerned for Iximaz's well-being. I am, too—and I apologize for talking about you of necessity here, Iximaz, but I believe I've expressed more or less what I'm about to say here to you before, so I hope it doesn't seem to come out of nowhere. Also, please know that this goes for anyone with mental health issues and the people who love them, not just you and Aegis.
Before going on, let me establish my credentials on this subject. I've been around the block with various forms of mental illness throughout my life (31 years, 32 this June, if anyone's wondering). Substance abuse, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and borderline personality disorder are all present in my family—all at once, in my dad's case. I've dealt with several friends when they were talking about suicide, one of whom was my boyfriend at the time. I've been in therapy and been prescribed medication for depression with anxiety myself. Also, my mom worked in the mental health field for roughly twenty years, and she taught me many skills that I've used to successfully navigate those situations.
Please bear all that in mind when I tell you, you need to understand that Iximaz must take responsibility for her own issues and her own choices. My understanding is that she had trust issues before joining the PPC, and that they may in fact be a symptom of her condition. If her illness prevents her from giving us an honest chance to prove that we will take her seriously, or from recognizing the good will of people toward her when it is rampantly on display, there isn't a single thing any of us can do about that. It's not our fault she has these deeply ingrained issues, and it's not our fault if she isn't doing what she needs to do to work through them.
Further, if she is not making responsible choices about when to interact with the community and when not to based on her mood/health status, that is not acceptable, and it falls to us as her friends to hold her accountable for it. We are not obliged to tolerate outbursts like this from anyone, especially not if we like them and wish to see them continue to be a valued member of the PPC community and society at large.
If she cannot make responsible choices for herself, that has very serious implications which go beyond what any of us can handle, because we are not trained mental health professionals. I caution you against making that argument unless you're prepared to accept those implications.
I believe, and I want Iximaz to believe, that she does have the power, the personal agency, the ability to make responsible choices for herself. It may take practice, and mistakes may happen, but that doesn't mean we should lower our expectations. That's as bad as saying she can't do it; see above paragraph.
So, yes, I stand by what I said, and I recommend that you think long and hard about whether denying Iximaz's responsibility for her actions is really helpful to her in the long run.
~Neshomeh -
Thank you, Nesh. by
on 2017-03-18 05:01:00 UTC
Link to this
Aegis, don't you go trying to argue this. You'll just make yourself look like an ass.
-
Additional data and concerns by
on 2017-03-17 22:08:00 UTC
Link to this
I know that Iximaz thinks no one will listen to her if she speaks up.
While working to address the problem of GlarnBoudin, I heard countless variations on that theme, including (notably) the thought that, once hS initially posted on the thread expressing doubts about how bad the problem really was, everyone would take his perspective over hers.
Is Iximaz right? -
A cautionary note. by
on 2017-03-17 22:25:00 UTC
Link to this
(Not really just directed at you, Tomash - more of a general comment on the trend I'm seeing.)
I'd appreciate it if we separate perceived "problems with the community" from individuals. This has happened before, I'm certain - people go "Once hS gets involved, everyone listens to him," and it comes off as an accusation towards Huinesoron. To my mind, this is utterly unreasonable. To hold someone responsible for the way the community respects or listens to them is absurd. Whether one agrees or disagrees with hS, blaming him for the fact that many in the community respects his opinion seems backwards, unfair, and often, really mean-spirited.
If you think the community doesn't take someone seriously enough, fine, say so. But to blame another voice for being taken seriously is way off. Other than telling Huinesoron to stop talking because people listen to him, I fail to see how this is a useful topic. -
I didn't intend to accuse or blame by
on 2017-03-18 01:06:00 UTC
Link to this
I was relaying Iximaz's perceptions of the community and her position within it. I mentioned hS because I believed that was a particularly interesting example of how Iximaz felt about us.
I can't comment on whether her perceptions are accurate. I hope they aren't.
I don't think hS did anything malicious in that situation, and any change in the collective opinion that (might have) happened after he first said something isn't his fault. Why would it be?
I'd also like to make it clear that I don't think anyone in the PPC set out to intentionally ignore Iximaz or downplay her concerns. If that happened, it was a collective failing that no one can be personally held responsible for. -
I apologize to them, too. by
on 2017-03-17 16:45:00 UTC
Link to this
It was wrong of me to say what I did and I'm sorry. I said things in anger that should not have been said and were unfair accusations.
-
Look after yourself however you need to. by
on 2017-03-17 07:37:00 UTC
Link to this
You'll always have friends here when you're ready to come back.
-hS and Kaitlyn -
*hugs* (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 05:08:00 UTC
Link to this
-
You don't have to be ashamed. by
on 2017-03-17 04:44:00 UTC
Link to this
We all know that you're going through a difficult time. Just know that we'll be here waiting with open arms when (and if) you decide to come back.
Actually, your post was surprisingly beneficial, in that the PPC is now looking at some form of reconstruction, which (quite obviously) needed to happen.
I wish you the best of luck in whatever you choose to do, and I hope that you will find true happiness (I mean, what kind of a friend would I be if I didn't hope that for you?).
Have a seal:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/54/ef/9a/54ef9a417ffa92309dccfbe59112cb4a.jpg
:) -
You're wrong here. by
on 2017-03-17 17:37:00 UTC
Link to this
I've said as much elsewhere, but you also need to be aware of this: Ix caused something despicable to happen and it's very much something to be ashamed of.
-
I would agree, but... by
on 2017-03-17 17:52:00 UTC
Link to this
I would agree, but Ix wasn't thinking straight when they posted. It's completely not their fault that the medication caused them to feel like this. And I do have experience with a situation similar to this. My sister was on a medication with side effects like the ones Ix described, and she said some pretty awful things a few times that she would never have said otherwise. Therefore, I have first hand experience with how medications can impact what people say.
Additionally, about the "witch-hunt" you mentioned happening on the Discord chat, we were merely trying to decide how to proceed with investigating Ix's accusations of bullying. That's not a witch-hunt.
I would also like to add that if Ix hadn't been on medications when they posted, then I would expect them to be ashamed. -
A request. by
on 2017-03-17 17:56:00 UTC
Link to this
As someone who believes that the discussion on the Discord was not a witch-hunt, can you please post a complete log of said discussion for those of us who do not wish to visit the Discord? I suggest posting it in reply to Desdendelle here.
hS -
I unfortunately don't know how to do that. by
on 2017-03-17 18:18:00 UTC
Link to this
I think that's a great idea, I just have no idea how to do it. The discussion also lasted for about an hour and a half (I think, it could've been longer), so a log would be very long.
-
It's not that hard. by
on 2017-03-17 18:49:00 UTC
Link to this
Two easy, simple methods:
a) screencap the conversation one screen at a time.
b) copy-paste the whole conversation into a txt file or something similar. -
Thanks (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 18:58:00 UTC
Link to this
-
That is unfair. by
on 2017-03-17 17:51:00 UTC
Link to this
As Neshomeh has rightly pointed out, Iximaz has mental health issues that can lead to her not being 100% rational all the time. This is very clearly one of those times.
What you have just said is extremely close to "Iximaz should be ashamed for having a mental illness".
hS -
Well... by
on 2017-03-17 18:48:00 UTC
Link to this
I think that some actions you ought to be ashamed of, regardless of whether you could be held responsible for them. If you — for example — ran over a cat that jumped before your car (ie, you had no control over this and couldn't turn the wheel or change anything), I think you should still feel some sort of shame despite being stuck in a deterministic situation.
It's the same here; it's not the mental illness that Ix should be ashamed of, it's the consequences. -
Des, take a step back. by
on 2017-03-17 20:02:00 UTC
Link to this
You are not helping. You are really not helping. And for the record? What you've written here is entirely superfluous. What you are saying is "Ix should feel bad" when, guess what? They are, and have been expressing how much throughout proceedings.
You are coming across as a comprehensive arsehole, regardless of whether or not it was your intention. I know you don't much care for either my opinion or my assessments of your character, but please: take a deep breath, then take several more. Your anger is clouding your judgement, however righteous and justified you may consider it. I've been there. For the love of God, man, what the hell are you following my lead for? -
You mean like this? by
on 2017-03-17 22:13:00 UTC
Link to this
scapegrace-Yesterday at 12:53 PM
Or we can watch hS tell us all that nothing's wrong and everything's fine and this was an isolated incident, and we'll all go "well, he'd know, he's hS", and nothing will happen, because nothing ever happens, because nothing happening is the easiest way to cope with things.
Some of you might be sensing a little hostility.
Ekyl-Yesterday at 12:54 PM
To say the least.
scapegrace-Yesterday at 12:54 PM
Cope.
SergioTurbo-Yesterday at 12:54 PM
If he goes "nothing happened", I'm the first who'll be very disappointed and the first to say that no, something HAS happened.
scapegrace-Yesterday at 12:55 PM
Not really what I meant, Sarge.
He won't say nothing happened, he'll say it's sad and he wishes them well and we'll go about our usual business and in a month it'll all be forgotten.
Because something else will have come along, and Nesh might have got another gobbet of Subjugation done, and something else might have happened, or hey, a cool Plort RP for us to sink our teeth into, or something, or something else.
And we will forget.
What the hell did I do to you, Scapegrace?
hS -
I'm a hypocrite. This is not new information. by
on 2017-03-17 23:47:00 UTC
Link to this
I shouldn't have used a specific example. I shouldn't have said it at all, and especially not in public. I apologize. You'll forgive me, though, for not wanting to delete the posts in question.
What Des was saying got to me in a way it really shouldn't have, as has everything else about this stupid internet drama. I'm just absolutely sick and tired of everything to do with it, and those posts? Basically made of panic at my best friend here having legitimate grievances ignored because someone else points and goes "See? They said a mean thing too! Clearly everyone's just as bad, let's just carry on as normal."
And this is just getting me angry again.
I'm sorry for what I said about you, hS. I should never have said it. -
Yes, thank you very much, Des. by
on 2017-03-17 19:16:00 UTC
Link to this
It's not like I don't feel bad enough about this whole mess. Really appreciate it.
-
Have fun, Seal. by
on 2017-03-17 01:15:00 UTC
Link to this
I mean that. Have fun. Be who you want to be. If the PPC has no place in your happiness, leaving is totally fine. If we were making your happiness impossible? I don't blame you for leaving. All of us should have been there for you.
I never really knew you that well. I never heard you accusing July. I never saw the cruelty. But I still feel like I should have been there for you more.
So go forth and do wonderful things, Iximaz. The people here who love you will be here if you want to talk to us again. -
You've been wronged. by
on 2017-03-16 19:55:00 UTC
Link to this
You haven't been protected when you needed it most. The situations with Ekyl and JulyFlame should have been taken more seriously, and we should have acted against GlarnBoudin more promptly. You've been treated horrifically and I understand why you want to leave.
I want to fix this situation. I've been a bystander or enabled abusive situations too often -- I'm going to read everything I can find on preventing abuse and implement it all.
I hope you find somewhere that will treat you better. I hope things start looking up for you. Best of luck and stay strong.
--Key -
Re: So long and thanks for all the fish. by
on 2017-03-16 19:33:00 UTC
Link to this
I sent a mail. I don't know if you'll read it, or that post for that matter, but know this.
I'm your friend. Several other people here are your friends. I'm sure we'll all be waiting for you, or at very last keep in touch with you.
Goodbye, my friend. Please don't go away. -
I'm so sorry that happened to you. by
on 2017-03-16 19:24:00 UTC
Link to this
I'll miss you. I don't hate you, or think you did anything wrong. *offers sad hug*
-
Are you including me in that? by
on 2017-03-16 18:16:00 UTC
Link to this
Because if so, that's pretty much the cruelest thing you could have said.
I'm still gonna try to be your friend, though, if you'll let me. -
Good-bye, Iximaz. You really will be missed. by
on 2017-03-16 17:01:00 UTC
Link to this
I just want to say that I'm very sorry that this happened, and that you're leaving. Though I suppose it's for the best since the PPC makes you feel like this.
I also want you to know that I consider you a friend, I'm sorry if you didn't know that.
When I said that you really will be missed, I meant it. Not just by me; I'm sure that there are many here who will miss you. You were a big part of this community. And rest assured that I mean every word I said.
Aa' menle nauva calen ar' ta hwesta e' ale'quenle; May your paths be green and the breeze on your back.
Good-bye,
-Jay
-
So, what are we bloody going to do? by
on 2017-03-16 18:33:00 UTC
Link to this
So, what are we bloody going to do? Iximaz's post needs a response. I'll freely admit, I have no solution. Haven't had time to think of any. What I do know is that, as a community, our response to bullying and accusations of bullying could, at the very least, do with some examination.
The Discord chat has been buzzing for the past... three hours, I believe. We agreed that we should move to the Board, so everyone can be a part of this discussion.
Let me briefly outline what the chat has been talking about. In general, many feel that this was a personal failure, as well as a failure on the part of the community. Our failure to act was, in Iximaz's eyes, a large part of the problem. Indeed, most of it.
Furthermore, several people think that there's an error in how we deal with bullying and accusations of bullying. Opinions vary: I feel more comfortable leaving that to individuals to put into their own words.
Lastly, many people in the Discord chat believe that we need a better response when bullying has been confirmed or is suspected. JulyFlame, several people--not all--think that your behavior is particularly troubling. This is one of the major reasons this post has been made; so that we are not talking without your input on what's happened. Again, I will leave the particulars of other people's opinions to their own enunciation.
Consider this post a summary of the feelings of much of the Discord chat (Iximaz was often in the chat, and talked about these things) and a springboard for further discussion and action. My own thoughts will be forthcoming, once I feel they're in good order.
Let's discuss this like rational human beings.
-Alleb -
No bans please, and no mods. by
on 2017-03-19 17:40:00 UTC
Link to this
Part of this site’s appeal to me is that the community cares for itself, and that the Nameless Admin is nameless because somebody must hold the keys, but they don’t actually want the authority. Having mods, and elections, and impeachments for mods who don’t do their jobs wouldn’t really solve any problems, it would just insert a new layer. We would still all need to work on making this the place we want it to be.
I’m not around as often as I would like to be, and I can’t react to situations I’m not aware of, but I’m personally guilty of not caring enough in at least one case, so I’m not exempt from having to work on that. Thus, here’s a promise: I solemnly swear that I will not act rashly, but that I also will not just sit around shaking my head and waiting for people I’m looking up to, when it’s up to me to call somebody out or – which may more probably be the case – dissolve a mutual misunderstanding.
This may come off as being too forgiving again, but after reading up, I honestly can’t see any bad intentions in this whole mess. Some of us overreacted and were carried away on Discord, and some of us may now be overreacting to this overreaction. Yes, Tomash screwed up big time, but amends have already been made and I trust that what else might be possible to do will be done soon, and there’s also this second chance thing in the Constitution. What could actually be accomplished by banning Tomash – or anybody else – other than telling them that we perform a symbolic act just so they know that they have been punished? I think our collective opinion has been made clear enough, everybody involved in the unintentional witch hunt is already repenting, and banning is far too serious to be used in a symbolic act. Sometimes, banning is necessary to get rid of unbearable nuisances, and if it is not made permanent, this just expresses hope that the person concerned doesn’t need an infinite amount of time to reform. This is certainly not applicable here.
Now, muting people on Discord is something I can get behind. If they are prone to talking before thinking things through, and have shown that they can’t be trusted to behave in an online chat, let them stay silent for a while. If we need to hand out punishments, this is what we should vote about.
HG -
The problem is the community often doesn't. by
on 2017-03-19 18:51:00 UTC
Link to this
It seems like we can hardly go two weeks without some big conflagration like this, and every time it goes the same way. People are hurt, maybe someone gets thrown out, it gets abruptly dropped as if nothing ever happened and if people start talking about improving things in the community so it's less likely drama gets so out of hand, it's "No, let's keep everything the same just for the sake of everything being the same."
I agree that we do need to work together to make the PPC a good place and all that, my concern is we often don't. -
Question for you. by
on 2017-03-20 18:02:00 UTC
Link to this
What incidents, exactly, does "No, let's keep everything the same just for the sake of everything being the same" refer to?
'Cause the last I checked, we've revised the Permission system several times and revised the Constitution several times in response to problems, not to mention gradual shifts in preferences and attitudes toward various things over time, in-universe and out.
I suspect you're talking solely about the fact that we're still using this Board, which you are on record as more or less hating, in which case you're being rather disingenuous with that accusation.
~Neshomeh -
Not disingenuousness, at worst faulty memory. by
on 2017-03-22 01:15:00 UTC
Link to this
I seemed to remember a lot of discussions about things like, yes, changing the board, but also moderator positions, Permission, Constitution stuff etc. I thought I remembered a lot of opposition to changing things in general. If I misrecall, sorry. When I'm free, I'll do some research on this.
-
Fair enough. by
on 2017-03-22 15:36:00 UTC
Link to this
It's true that you haven't been here for a while—though, wait, weren't you heavily involved with setting up the Permission prompts system in the first place? That was kind of a big deal.
But that said, maybe try to avoid vague casting of aspersions when you haven't really been around for a while?
Actually, we should all try to avoid vague casting of aspersions in general.
~Neshomeh -
I wrote a bunch of 'em! by
on 2017-03-22 15:51:00 UTC
Link to this
That said, this was at least a couple years ago, wasn't it? I've had a lot going on in my life.
-
I assumed... by
on 2017-03-20 18:10:00 UTC
Link to this
... it was a reference to my post on moderators. If so, I don't think it's a fair characterisation of what I said, but I can see how it could be read that way.
hS -
Conversation in the Discord moreso than your post. by
on 2017-03-22 01:08:00 UTC
Link to this
In class, have shedload of work to do. Update on this later.
-
Apologies/I feel really stupid by
on 2017-03-19 04:52:00 UTC
Link to this
First off, I have not been hiding from this issue. I've just been at a friend's house for the past two days. I was very busy there, and I wouldn't have been able to give this discussion a thoughtful response.
I apologize to July for not trying to stop the screenshot from being posted. I was only thinking of it in terms of evidence, and not how it would be an invasion of privacy. This is a very serious deal. I'm very, very, sorry, July. I should've known better. Since I don't even know you at all, I shouldn't have made any comments on the matter.
I apologize to the Discord chat for not helping. I have literally only been part of the PPC for 34 days; add that to the fact that I just vomit out words without thinking when I'm feeling emotional, and you have someone who really should not be part of such an important discussion. In fact, I was pretty aggravating.
I apologize to Ix for being part of this discussion. I don't know enough about Ix, about the Brink incident, about the Glarn incident, about mental health, or really any part of this at all! For crying out loud! Why on earth did I think I could help! So yeah, I feel really stupid. Sorry, Ix, I shouldn't have made myself part of something so important and emotional with so little information.
Of course, the discussion on the Discord is different from the one on the Board. Everyone is supposed to be part of the Board discussion (at least, that's what I'm gathering). But I could have stayed out of the Discord one.
On the subject of bans:
I think Tomash should get a month-long ban at the most. I do think his actions were serious. However, they were meant to help, and that does matter.
Some people have called for Aegis's ban. That's just dumb. He's Ix's boyfriend! I would be worried if he didn't have strong feelings about this! It's only right for him to be agitated about their welfare. Yes, it would have helped for him to take a step back. But that goes for literally everyone on Discord who participated in this fiasco.
For everyone else on the Discord (everyone else participating, that is), I just have to say that we all let things get really out of hand. We should be embarrassed. Though I don't think any bans are in order. Except for one, and that one would be mine. Looking back on it, I realize I acted irresponsibly. As a person with very little information, I shouldn't have tried to be part of the initial argument on Discord. I may be overreacting, but I feel very ashamed of myself, and I think a temporary ban is just.
Lastly, I think mods are a very good idea. I do like the thought of a community where everyone can be responsible. We cannot do that. We clearly need some people who can propose votes, and announce the final decision. For instance, right now there are a million different ideas floating around the Board about what to do. Consequently, no one knows what to do. We're just milling around, voting on this or that idea, and it all comes down to nothing happening.
Sorry if that was slightly incoherent. I'm tired, ashamed of myself, and frustrated with this mess. -
Re: your ban by
on 2017-03-20 01:06:00 UTC
Link to this
I think you're being too hard on yourself there. There's no rule that says newbies have to stay out of the serious stuff, and in fact, your lack of previous involvement might have in many circumstances been a good thing, because you wouldn't have been coming into the discussion with some preconceived notions about various people. And from what I can tell in the logs, you weren't running around calling for bans or anything like that. You mostly confined yourself to summaries of what was being discussed and general proposals for reform.
That said, if you want to ban yourself (from the Discord or the PPC) for a while in penance, I can't possibly object. Your call. -
My apologies go to July and Ixi as well. by
on 2017-03-19 15:22:00 UTC
Link to this
I was not aware of most of the matters with Ixi save for the GlarnBoudin incident, and my refusal to help was due to the fact that I didn't want to risk my friendship with him elsewhere, plus my busy life meant I didn't know about it until relatively late into the incident. I'm sorry that I did not jump in sooner, and that I didn't do enough to help resolve the matter.
As for today, I could've avoided being involved with what little information I had, but I jumped in regardless because I had a lot of feelings on the matter that I felt I had to express. Venting is fine and all, but it does nothing without taking actions, and I should've been stronger with mine. More importantly, I should've stopped the doxxing at the source and called out the ones who were calling for it to be brought up immediately and publicly. July, I am so sorry that I didn't do more to put a stop to this matter, and also that I didn't nip it in the bud no matter how much effort I put into halting it as it was. I talked to the wrong person, I tried to solve the wrong issue. Had I known the true extent of what was happening I could've done both of these differently and made more of a difference in the aftermath of this matter. And for that, July, I am truly sorry.
Regarding bans, I agree that Tomash doesn't deserve a six-month ban, let alone a year-long ban, because he was genuinely trying to help and feels guilty over his actions. That doesn't change the fact that they were serious, but I think two months would be ideal so that he could take the time off and pull himself together. Nobody else deserves to be banned, though, because I've stated more than once that such actions solve nothing and drive people away from this community. Is that what we want people to see the first time they come across the Board?
Jay- Awesomeness Central, you're still relatively new, and getting a feel for the community; I think what happened was that you came in close to a very bad time and didn't know better. I don't blame you for feeling guilty - I've done some of the same things as you have in the past - but I can also say that outright leaving the community and its problems won't solve anything, and this is coming from someone who seriously thought at one point that if it weren't for his unfinished story plots, he'd actually consider it. I too am ashamed of what's happened, but that doesn't mean I can't learn from it, and the same goes to you. I hope you and everyone else can learn from their mistakes and that we can be better prepared for future incidents of this caliber should they arise (I personally pray that they don't but knowing the Internet, and human society, I don't think any promises can be made about it).
I must also state that both you and hS have valid points. Mods are indeed a good idea to keep people in line, but at the same time this is a community where everyone is expected to uphold the Constitution. Higher-ups aren't necessarily required for the latter, but we must also be careful about the former. To reference an Aesop fable, we don't want a King Log who can't effectively manage the pond, nor do we want a King Stork who abuses their power and picks on the frogs he lords over. In light of this, however, there's a bit of a dilemma in that we could be content with our lot and try to sort through the sheer amount of suggestions about how to better handle the community as a group, or we could try to find the most reasonable authority figures and operate based on at least a small degree of subjectivity. I don't know if there's any way we can resolve all of this that doesn't have at least some disadvantages, but at the very least, we should try to minimize potential problems when selecting mods, if we do, and the rest of us should still continue working to uphold the community standards going forward. -
One more thing: Discord mods. by
on 2017-03-19 01:12:00 UTC
Link to this
Now that two of us are resigned and the others are either asleep at peak hours or not around often, we need more mods, especially now that we have a troll in the chatroom that can't be kicked in the meantime.
I'd like to nominate Maslab and Delta Juliette as replacements since they have proven to be reliable in the past. -
Seconding Maslab and Delta Juliette. by
on 2017-03-19 01:19:00 UTC
Link to this
They've proven they're responsible, level-headed, and exactly the right amount of interfering. They also have the requisite amount of experience. I trust them.
-
Supporting Maslab's and DJ's nominations. (nm) by
on 2017-03-22 00:39:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Suits me fine. (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 13:58:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Sounds good to me! (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 13:16:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Green light for Maslab and Delta Juliette from me. (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 08:50:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I would agree to this. by
on 2017-03-19 07:05:00 UTC
Link to this
Not sure this really means all that much coming from me, but Maslab and Delta Juliette are rational individuals as far as I can see. So, assuming I get one and they accept, consider my vote cast for them.
-
Yet another vote for Maslab and Delta (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 06:01:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Same here. (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 05:53:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I vote for them too by
on 2017-03-19 04:56:00 UTC
Link to this
I agree with voting for them for the same reasons Aegis listed. I freely admit that I don't know either of them very well, but they seem like good, steady, people from what I've seen of them.
-
Another show of confidence for Maslab and Delta Juliette (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 04:51:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Ban Calls: Mattman's Revision by
on 2017-03-18 23:57:00 UTC
Link to this
I call for the 1 to 6 month ban of Tomash, with length determined as per boarder's decision.
I call for the involved boarders, particularly those mentioned in PoorCynic's revision, for an express written apology to July for the action of Witch Hunting. This is especially applies to Aegis, Alleb, Ekyl, Granz, and Khrstty, for reasons mentioned in PC's post
Let's keep this discussion rational. -
I have spoken to July, and vote against a ban. by
on 2017-03-19 21:52:00 UTC
Link to this
I feel that Tomash's doxxing of July was outside the remit of the Constitution. If someone commits a potentially endangering act, we are under no obligation to let them say 'sorry, mistake, won't happen again'.
But that doesn't mean we can't say that. I have spoken with July, and she doesn't feel that it's necessary for Tomash to be banned. Therefore, I vote that Tomash not be banned.
Instead, I propose that he and everyone else involved consider this thread as an emphatic explanation under Article Seven that their behaviour was wrong. I think most of the people from the chat have admitted this by now anyway, and there are several apologies floating around.
Therefore, for everyone who is a first-time offender, they should be requested to make an apology, and commit themselves to not repeating their mistakes. Then they should be allowed to move on. That's what our Constitution allows for, and I happen to think that it's a very fair way to deal with people who have acted badly once.
hS -
I like this, and I have an additional suggestion. by
on 2017-03-19 02:01:00 UTC
Link to this
First, on Tomash: I've thought it over, I've talked it out, and I've come to the conclusion that permanently banning Tomash does not fix anything and would not make our community better. I believe he understands why and how what he did was wrong, has done all he can to undo the damage, and will make every effort to avoid the same mistakes in the future. In addition, he was in good standing prior to this. However, a serious infraction merits a serious response, so a temporary ban may still be in order. Perhaps three months.
Second, on everyone else named in PC's revision: an apology is certainly required, not just to July, but to Iximaz, too, for my money. It's absurd how you've allowed your feelings about her to twist you into knots, and it's unfair to make her responsible for that by continuing to excuse yourselves on the basis that you were worried about her. There are lots of better things you could have done with your feelings. No one needs the burden of their friends' reactivity stirring up unwanted trouble on their behalf—and she's said repeatedly that she does not want to be the cause of drama.
However, allow me to propose an alternative to mass banning that still actually penalizes the bad behavior: if possible, lock the Discord temporarily. No one is allowed in for three months, minimum. You abused the privilege of a live chatroom by letting things get out of hand in there, so you all can slum it in forum time with the rest of us for a while. Then, when you go back, perhaps you'll appreciate it and respect it more.
I know some of you will protest that you weren't involved in this fracas, so you shouldn't lose the privilege. Maybe that's true, but on the other hand, maybe a temporary personal sacrifice is a small price to pay for justice and a healthier Discord in the future. Think about it before you object.
~Neshomeh -
Mostly agreed with, but with a slight amendment: by
on 2017-03-19 02:42:00 UTC
Link to this
Here's what I propose: Banning the people involved in the witch-hunt from the Discord for at least 1-3 months. This way, the people who weren't involved (like, say, Delta Juliette, Cat On The Keyboard, that one complete twerp called, er, Space Grape? Something like that...) aren't unfairly penalized for the actions of a few that they were, to pull an example completely out of nowhere, curled up under a duvet unable to stop shaking or crying because they were terrified their best friend didn't want them around any more. It also serves as a punishment directly related to their actions; if they can't be trusted to use an IRC channel properly and with respect for others, then they don't get to do so any more. I think that's fairer than, if you'll forgive the obligatory and slightly worn-out fandom reference, turning the Discord into a statue for three months.
Now it's my apology time.
I'm not a well person. I get extraordinarily defensive when I feel that my friends are being attacked. That's no excuse for what I've been saying to multiple people on the Board and Discord, none of whom deserved it. I'm sorry. I'm sorry I got so angry, and I'm sorry I didn't keep that anger under control. I should know better by now, but it doesn't appear that I do.
Given how I've comported myself recently, in multiple threads on the Board, I completely understand if people want to push for my being formally punished in some manner. All I want is to be a credit to this community, the community that gave me second, third, seventh, twenty-fifth chances, that picked me up and dusted me off when I fell off the anger wagon time and time again.
I have failed you.
Most of all, I've failed Ix.
By letting my anger rule me I have made things worse for them and I, I can't... I can't begin to express just how much of a stain upon the surface of the world that makes me feel. You're my best friend and I have let you down and forced you to defend me for... basically as long as we've been friends. I have let you down so, so often.
I'm sorry.
I want to fix it.
I don't know how.
I'm scared to find out. -
I'm seconding this. by
on 2017-03-19 22:32:00 UTC
Link to this
The Discord ban sounds just like right. So, my idea would be:
- A medium term "global" ban for Tomash (3-6 months). One year bans are usually reserved for those who don't come to their senses and apologize, while Tomash did - but, at the same time, apologizing should not be a "get-out-of-jail" card when very serious offenses are made.
- A short-medium Discord ban as per Scape's idea (1-3 months), but coupled with a short Board ban as well (2 weeks - 1 month?), with the same reasoning as above.
Mind you, this is not meant in constrast to the second chance granted by the the Constitution, but as a matter of consequences: One must accept the consequences of their own mistakes, as mistakes can have long-lasting consequences on other people.
July was mass-backstabbed. Just like the wounds to her soul will take time to heal, I believe everyone involved needs to take some time off the Board to reflect deeply on what happened. -
Disagree on the apology. by
on 2017-03-19 02:20:00 UTC
Link to this
At least, to me. If I'd been able to just restrain myself, none of this would be happening and things would still be fine. I'm at as much fault as anyone here.
Short of banning everyone from the Discord, I don't think it's possible to actually lock it, and looking at how out-of-hand things got on the Board, both now and in the past, I don't think getting rid of the chatroom would have made much of a difference. -
Perhaps, but... by
on 2017-03-19 02:42:00 UTC
Link to this
Everybody has to own their actions, not just you. If you don't think you've been wronged in the ways I've described, that's one thing, but taking all the blame yourself is another, and I for one won't stand for it.
On that note, I'll put my money where my mouth is and apologize for participating in those late-night sessions the times I did. Even though I felt it was wrong, I went along with it and implicitly said it was okay when that's not what I really believe. I should have expressed my feelings more clearly, and I should have left. I'm sorry for not behaving more responsibly as someone who should ostensibly know better.
On the Discord... well, darn. But just to clarify, I'm not suggesting getting rid of it forever, and I know things can and do get out of hand here, too. But at least when they go wrong here, everyone can see it. I'm searching for the middle ground between banning and nothing that some people were wishing for.
~Neshomeh -
It's alright. by
on 2017-03-19 03:23:00 UTC
Link to this
Before, the meds just made me loopy. They were different meds from the ones that made me, well. Do that; the psychiatrist was trying me on new meds that gave me awful mood swings (seriously, I had to take a few days off work because the withdrawal made things worse and I really don't want to throw a mic stand at my boss). The voice chat from before wasn't really different from laughing at the silly stuff your friends do while tipsy. I'll admit to being amused at some of the stuff I came up with and it doesn't really bother me. What happened the other night was entirely my fault, though, even more so because I acknowledged I wasn't feeling myself and thought it would still be a good idea to chat. They were different situations; I don't think you need to apologize for that.
Re the Discord 'pause' for lack of a better word, yeah, that's a good point. The only question now is if enough people would actually vote regarding that issue when there's like sixteen different votes vying for attention at the moment. -
It's possible to mute specific users. by
on 2017-03-19 02:35:00 UTC
Link to this
That would mean they could observe the server, but would be unable to actually participate in discussions on it.
-
Sounds reasonable to me. (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 00:01:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Re: calls for my ban by
on 2017-03-18 21:42:00 UTC
Link to this
Many people feel that I should be banned from the PPC, either permanently or temporarily, because I posted July's real name and face in the Discord chat on Thursday. I again acknowledge that what I did was completely unacceptable, and I cannot overstate my regret that I invaded another PPCer's privacy in such a drastic way.
I acknowledge that there was a remote possibility that what I did could have posed a threat to July's life, and I am horrified that I contributed to the possibility of that. I do, however, feel that, given the rather limited distribution of the screenshot (at most, say 30 people, none of whom I believe would want July killed, could have seen it before it was deleted, and I expect that the number of people who actually saw the information that didn't already know it is much smaller), several people have rather overstated an extremely improbable outcome.
I would like to attempt to describe what I was (or, more importantly, wasn't) thinking when I posted that screenshot. At that time, the chat was considering Iximaz's allegations. I wanted to provide a piece of evidence that would help the community decide whether or not Iximaz was right. I had been discussing that screenshot privately for several days, and, in my mind, it was the "conversation between July and Iximaz". In my emotional disarray at Iximaz's possible death (which was still entirely possible at the time) and how I might have helped cause it, I didn't think through what I was posting. I forgot that screenshot contained July's real name. Not paying attention to that was a terrible mistake, and I yet again apologize to JulyFlame for what I did. It shouldn't have happened.
Now, to those of you calling for a permanent ban, I would like to request my Article 7 second chance. I have stopped (or, in this case, attempted to mitigate the damage). I have apologized. I have come to a more complete realization of what I did. I would like to make amends. I beg all of you to allow me to do so instead of driving me out forevermore!
I don't know what form the amends will take. That is for you, the community, to decide. There need to be consequences for what I did. A common proposal has been a temporary ban from the Discord or the entire PPC community for some length of time. I can't say that wouldn't be an appropriate thing for me to do.
I'm a self-imposed ban (one that, in future debates, could be counted as a ban) from at least the chat if not the whole PPC so I can reflect on my actions in this entire mess. Could y'all please suggest an term? I can't seem to decide what would be a fitting one.
Additionally, several people have reminded us that a permanent ban has, in the past, been reserved for those who are so detrimental to the continued healthy working of the community that their presence will tear the place apart. They haven't been, and I understand, weren't meant to be, a penalty for a first offense by a PPCer who was otherwise in good standing. Is my mistake so terrible a sin that I should be cast out forever? Am I so beyond redemption that I can't be allowed here? Please tell me if you think that, I would like to know where I stand.
There are a few additional things I'd like to point out.
First, I would like to note that this is a much harsher range of proposed responses than were proposed when Matt Cipher harassed July about returning to the Discord. In that case, Matt apologized and resigned his power over the Discord server. To my knowledge, no one called for Matt to be banned. Could we, while voting on this, clarify if the reason for this is that my conduct was so much worse than Matt's or if it's because we have decided to get tougher on wrongdoers? I think answering that question will help the PPC make these decisions in the future.
Secondly, during this thread, there's been many mentions of witch-hunting and mob mentality. I would like to raise the possibility that many of the people involved in the doxxing, potentially including myself, are being unintentionally targeted by an angry mob. I think it's possible that the community, or some parts of if, want something, anything to be done, and my actions and the actions of others in the Discord have made us easy targets for collective anger. That's not saying I don't deserve to be punished for this, but could we all please take a moment to make sure I'm being punished with a clear collective head?
I would also like to ask that, since this is now a community vote, someone start making posts with tallies and such to make it easier to keep track of the status of the vote.
- Tomash -
Hope you don't mind if I put my thoughts here, Tomash. by
on 2017-03-19 03:27:00 UTC
Link to this
This thread has gotten so wild I genuinely don't know where else to lay out my thoughts.
So, first thought, Tomash. I don't think he needs to be permabanned. Doxxing someone is absolutely a serious offense, but it's also (so far as I know) his first in about six years of spotless membership. He has acknowledged it was wrong, apologized repeatedly and profusely for it, and resolved to make amends in whatever way he can. In addition to which, his offense was, or at least seemed to me, a mistake made in dire circumstances with the genuine intention of providing people ait all facts available, rather than a malicious attack or deliberate violation of the rules or common decency. That, to me, is not a situation that merits a permaban.
Some form of consequence is necessary, certainly, but permabans are not the tool for this job. I strongly believe that they should be reserved for cases where there is a repeated or drastic negative consequence to someone's continued presence. I do not see that as the case with Tomash, or anyone else involved in this matter. If people want to discuss a temp ban, I'll leave them to it. I still don't think it's the best course, and I'll vote as such, but I'm only one member.
Now as to the secondary ban proposals, I strongly oppose banning any of the people mentioned in PC and Des' lists, for any length of time. Witchhunting members of the community is very much Not Cool, but neither is mass banning members on first offenses without first giving due consideration to less drastic courses. Even temporary bans are significant, especially in the case of Khryssty, who's only been here about a month, if I recall correctly.
I would also like to voice my concern over the frequency of bans being suggested. Many of the candidates suggested have never had problems before, and are now being considered for bans as long as twelve months, without, as far as I have seen, even any significant effort being made to so much as talk to them about it. This deeply troubles me. I know we want to make it clear that witchhunting/bullying and such things are not tolerated here, but I worry that if we start looking at problems as "does this merit a ban?" rather than "what can we do to resolve this?" we won't look as hard for more constructive solutions. When all you have is a hammer, and all that. Perhaps I'm just being paranoid, but I would be much reassured if we resolved to at the bare minimum tackle each case individually. This name listing in ban proposals does not sit well with me.
All that aside, though, there is something I would like us all to keep in mind as this discussion goes on, particularly in light of the controversial tone it may take; we all try to be friends (or at least pleasant acquaintances) here. We don't always succeed, but that's the goal, so while this is a crisis, try to remember that we're all doing what we think is best for the community and for each other.
In that same vein, I would like to thank everyone who has posted so far for participating in this discussion. This is rough stuff, easy to want to shy away from, particularly if you're not personally involved. It's gratifying to see everyone weighing in.
I especially want to thank Neshomeh, Seafarer, and Storme Hawk for taking the time to so thoroughly and articulately lay out their thoughts on this. I won't deny I was more than a little fired up when I first started going through this thread, but seeing their comments helped me remember to check my temper before posting.
Finally, if we do end up calling for a vote—something I would very much prefer to avoid, for the record—I vote no action taken.
-Badger
P.S.
I apologize for the no doubt error-ridden state of this post. It's taken the better part of the day to catch up on all this and to organize my thoughts on it. Fatigue is not kind to my mental spellchecker. -
My perspective on this. by
on 2017-03-18 22:54:00 UTC
Link to this
Firstly, the difference between your and Matt's conduct.
Matt's harassment of July caused no irrevocable damage. When he saw the error of his ways, he was able to make amends for the totality of his actions - there was no risk of permanent physical or mental harm to July.
You, on the other hand, posted private information about her in a public place. This potentially placed her at risk of actual, physical harm. This difference, I think, justifies calling for your ban while allowing Matt to remain.
However, I believe that the people calling for you to be permanently banned are taking things too far. You have been an upstanding member of the community in every post of yours that I've seen, and I see no reason for you to be thrown under the bus for a first offence.
Furthermore, upon having the implications of your behaviour pointed out to you, you immediately recognised that you had done wrong and did everything in your power to make amends for it. By the Constitution, you should be given a second chance, which I think some people here have overlooked.
Because of the severity of what you did, though, I feel your second chance has to come after a period of banning from the PPC as a whole. There is a risk - however small - that your actions may lead/have led to JulyFlame suffering severe harm.
I hope that this sufficiently explains my perspective on your situation (and hopefully some of the people calling for permanent bans read this and come to their senses).
(I'm not sure whether voting is meant to go here, but I'll say it just in case: I vote for a six month ban of Tomash. I also call upon everyone involved in the Discord debacle to apologise to anyone hurt by their conduct.) -
My vote: by
on 2017-03-18 21:47:00 UTC
Link to this
A six month ban for Tomash and resignation of Discord modship. No ban for anyone else.
-
(And yes, I'm sober at the moment.) (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 21:48:00 UTC
Link to this
-
RE: Constitution by
on 2017-03-18 18:31:00 UTC
Link to this
So, I have seen this idea pitched around a few times in the threads below and in Discord Logs. I'll post this here, since I have been considering it for a while.
I think we need to redo the entire Constitution from the ground up. My biggest issue regarding the Constitution is the humor inserted into it. Excerpted below:
1. "This webpage will self-destruct in thirty seconds.
*Hides; several hours pass*
Never mind, then...
*Comes out of hiding*
BOOM!"
2. (And all that other medieval mumbo-jumbo those town criers say. Forsooth verily!)
3. 6. All discovered mimes will be thrown into a pit, which may or may not be filled with various objects such as scorpions upon their availability.
6.5. There will be no clemency for these mimes until they learn the words.
4. There is no Article 19.
5. "Do not meddle in the affairs of assassins! They are heavily armed and quick to anger. And not noticeably subtle."
While I understand these are all quintessentially PPC, I am a firm believer that the rules that govern the community should not be played for laughs at any point. It can come across as saying Oh we really aren't all that serious here. This is a problem. I think the rules should be changed to reflect the fact that they are indeed serious business. I also think that we should streamline and simplify the current iteration as well. We essentially hold a PPC Constitutional Convention. We can trim the fat from the current Constitution, put in new rules that address events that we did not have before, and ensure that it is the best it can be. -
I don't think the Constitution is a problem. by
on 2017-03-18 19:41:00 UTC
Link to this
Mainly because you can't dictate that people know how to handle themselves and others when someone is in crisis. "Behave like someone who's been taught to manage this incredibly difficult situation, OR ELSE!" Come on, if you want to be serious, be serious.
Also because, no matter how many times you rewrite the rules, it still falls to each individual to understand and uphold them. If people don't understand that the Constitution calls for decency, respect, and socially responsible conduct now, they won't after yet another re-write, either.
Also because we just did a re-write to address the subject of bullying and harassment and to streamline the articles. Not enough people pitched in to ratify it. Some claimed they didn't feel qualified to comment; most didn't say anything at all. The discussion was put aside for later on the grounds that the few people who were involved were burned out. If you were around then and could have stepped up but chose not to, you have no right to complain now.
~Neshomeh -
Hold on a second. by
on 2017-03-18 19:53:00 UTC
Link to this
Are you suggesting that because some chose not to speak up at one point on a single issue they are then henceforth banned from ever addressing that issue again in the future?
I am also not suggesting something so nonsensical as you think I am suggesting. I think that the amount of humor inserted may make some people not take all the rules seriously. At no point did I ever suggest that the rules should be "Behave like someone who's been taught to manage this incredibly difficult situation. OR ELSE!" Those were never my words.
I am merely suggesting something that looks like a real websites terms/conditions/rules/etc. And that gets to another point that has been addressed previously and I am now seconding that idea. I think we need some kind of formal moderation system. Because let's face it, if you leave it up to the individual, it is an exercise in futility.
Also again? No right to complain now? If you think that's what this is, then fine. Consider this me reoppening that discussion then. -
I'm sorry, I got ahead of myself. by
on 2017-03-18 20:56:00 UTC
Link to this
You're right, I shouldn't put words in your mouth, and no, I'm not saying that silent once is silent forever.
My logic train goes something like this:
As you've noted, the idea of revising the Constitution (possibly from scratch) has come up here and in Discord, the idea being to put it in the rules that bullying behavior is not acceptable. Well, we already did that, and I find most of the names involved in the current discussion missing from that conversation. That's frustrating. The Board had a shot then at getting what they say they want now, but they apparently didn't take it seriously at the time. I don't see that it makes any sense to blame a failing of the rules for this situation when the rules would be there right now if more people had said unequivocally "Yes, we want this set in stone, please make it so" when it was under discussion before. That's what I mean when I say they have no right to complain about the Constitution. A document cannot be blamed for a failure on the part of the people responsible for creating and upholding it.
To explain the OR ELSE bit: What I see as a major contributing factor to this fracas is a serious lack of understanding of how to handle mental illness. I've attempted to explained this in my various posts. Therefore, in my head, any new rules meant to prevent a situation like this from arising again would have to address that facet of it, which I don't think would be appropriate or effective. That's where the hyperbole came from. I'm sorry for skipping the context.
~Neshomeh -
A revised call for bans. by
on 2017-03-18 18:19:00 UTC
Link to this
I propose to the community that the following actions be taken:
1) That Tomash be permanently banned from the PPC for sharing someone else's guarded information without their knowledge or consent. While it was could be interpreted as a negligent act more than a strictly malevolent one, the fact still stands that it was a gross violation of confidentiality and trust. Plus, as Neshomeh mentioned here, July is an actively serving member of the United States military. This action thus has the genuine potentiality to threaten her life. An appropriate response must be made.
2) That the following indivduals—Alleb, Granz, and Khrssty—be banned from the PPC for a period no less than a year. Their voices seem to have been the main driving force behind this witch hunt. And yes, it was a witch hunt, despite what some of you have repeatedly protested. To say otherwise is to be deliberately blind to something very obvious.
3) That Aegis and Ekyl be banned from the PPC for a period no less than four months. Aegis appears to be the major force behind pushing for the screenshot to be pushed to the board. He has also exacerbated the situation through his actions in Discord and muddied events due to his recent postings on the Board. His behavior in the logs suggests that he had already judged July as being guilty. Ekyl, on the other hand, seems to have been a regularly present voice, poking along the chat with comments such as "And let's not make it out like July is some angel who's never wronged anybody ever" or "But these feelings have existed for a long time among many people". An agitator, if you will.
4) That the remaining PPCers who were privy to this incident but did nothing to stop it make an official public apology to July. That includes Desdendelle, Akrinor, Storme Hawk, Matt Cypher, SkarmorySilver, Jay - Awesomeness Central, and Hardric. If the PPC had some form of official censure between that and ban, I would have asked for it, but that's how things go.
I have no doubt that this proposal will be heavily debated. I welcome your input and hope that we can come together on some sort of agreement.
PoorCynic -
I am so sorry. by
on 2017-03-19 01:11:00 UTC
Link to this
First: I am sorry that I didn't say anything during the incident at all. Not when the screenshot went up, not when the witch-hunt was starting before then, and not even the moment I noticed Iximaz had left.
There is no excuse for my lack of a response to each and every one of these.
I am sorry I didn't immediately respond to the doxxing.
I am sorry I didn't say anything during the extended witch-hunt. At the time, I thought I was trying to gather information and context about the situation while (obviously) worrying about Iximaz; in retrospect, my being passive was a terrible choice to make.
Finally, to Iximaz: I am sorry for not recognizing harassment by Glarn. I am sorry for not recognizing any moves you've made in the past to try and bring bullying here to light and to discuss and act on it in a timely manner. I am sorry for not learning about what harassment looks like online or how people react to being bullied. I intend to fix that as soon as possible. -
Permanent bans are not the solution. by
on 2017-03-19 00:07:00 UTC
Link to this
Look, permanently banning someone is not gonna do the trick. And let me say that many, many, people who serve in the military have their faces and names revealed. That is all.
-
With all due respect... by
on 2017-03-19 00:26:00 UTC
Link to this
Just because something happens often, does not mean it okay or somehow not bad. And while I am not certain that a permanent ban is both a) the right decision or b) going to solve this issue going forward, I for one believe that we, as a community need to send a strong message that this kind of behavior is not going to be tolerated.
And before people go, "Oh he apologized" that does not make it better or undo the damage. At best it would count as a mitigating factor. -
Heavily debated, huh? by
on 2017-03-18 21:37:00 UTC
Link to this
Perfectly happy to oblige. Thanks for the invitation.
1) I more than agree that Tomash was in the wrong for sharing that information. I more than agree that he ought to be punished. But not only has he already explained why he did the things he did and where he was coming from, he has deleted every copy he had of what was shared (last I heard, the only copy left around was in Ix's possession, but that might be outdated news now). I have also gathered that this was his first time doing things like this. A perma-ban? I don't think that's right. Several months - let's say six to be on the generous side - should be a sufficient show of not-letting-you-in.
2) A year's ban for that? No. That's still too much. I'm not going to say they should go unpunished - they were undeniably exacerbating the situation, from what I've gathered - but a year is way too long. It's long enough that there would almost be no point in coming back after the sentence was done. Two or three months is still more than I'd really like to give, but I'm trying to be impartial here.
3) I really don't have too many problems with Ekyl's period - but that's because he has admitted that he doesn't want an end to this mess. So I'm being a little less objective than I could be on that front.
But for Aegis? Heck no. In my opinion, he doesn't need a ban at all - he was worried for his not-yet-engaged-to-person. But if he were banned at all, a week or two would be fine.
4) An apology is fine. -
??? (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 22:45:00 UTC
Link to this
-
As I recall by
on 2017-03-18 21:29:00 UTC
Link to this
I mentioned that we should, in fact, censor the information to protect July's privacy. I also specifically requested July's contact information so that I could get in touch with her obtain both her side of the story and her consent in posting the screenshot (and even that only in the event it became relevant). I wasn't even going to post it if she didn't give me permission.
I wasn't advocating plastering July's name and face all over the Board. I wasn't advocating anything but looking further into this mess by getting July's side of the story. I'm no longer advocating even that, as it's obvious to me, as explained by Neshomeh and Kaitlyn, that doing so would further no one's ends.
I wanted her opinion on all of this. The punishment for that, I'll happily accept. -
On bans: by
on 2017-03-18 20:43:00 UTC
Link to this
My own, if voted up, I will accept without objection. Heck, if I get a vote in this, I vote for my own. I'm not exactly a constructive influence at the best of times, and, regardless of what I think of any individual person, I can't say what I think of the community as a whole.
For the others, however, I think you're going too far. Tomash, particularly, does not deserve a permanent ban for a single mistake. To be clear, this is in light of the fact that, as far as I know, every copy of the screenshot in question has been deleted. Let us say that the screenshot was available for forty-eight hours, even though I believe it was likely more of a twenty-four hour matter. Assuming that we at least suppose PPC members are not secretly assassins for the Kremlin, that means there is a forty-eight hour window in which a hostile entity could have accessed the Board or Discord and found July's identity. For this small, accidental window created with the sole intention of bringing context to the general Discord, you propose a permanent removal. Whether there should be a temporary ban, I'll let others work out.
On the others? Firstly, a year-long ban effectively is a permanent ban. Expecting most people to come back after a year of absence is ridiculous. Such a period of exile for essentially seeing some kind of problem and wanting to move against it while acknowledging that in order to do so, they would have to take it to the Board, which I would like to remind you, they did, and I would also note that if they hadn't done so, it's very possible you wouldn't even know this had happened. For Aegis and Ekyl? Also ridiculous. We are talking about removing them for a third of a year for, essentially, continuing to present opinions about a future course of action. That's great. Truly.
An apology, I think, is in order from everybody, regardless of who is banned for how long, except perhaps Desdendelle, who argued against our actions and couldn't do much to actually stop us because he can't, say, forcibly prevent us from posting on the Board. I make one here.
JulyFlame, I would like to apologize for my actions and thoughts on you. I assumed the worst, without first knowing your side of the story, and because of that, I did not object when your personal information was revealed, and pushed to move the matter into an official inquiry without taking the time to examine why I did so. For this, I am sorry.
And now, two last notes. The first is on the nature of bans and temporary bans themselves. A ban is supposed to be the removal of an person who, to quote a friend, ".. is a repeat offender, is consistently not accepting of responsibility or punishments, and is unable to fit in with the community whatsoever." It is only to be used when somebody has proven that they cannot, beyond a shadow of a doubt, repent and reform into a constructive member of the community. A temporary ban is a moral punishment in which one person violates previously existing rules, and is intended to serve as a punishment, not as a way to drive them away from the community without initiating a full ban.
The second note is something that I believe everybody looking at this message knows, but I will say it anyways, because somebody must. Most, if not all, people looking at this thread say that Desdendelle's idea cannot be implemented, and so you have devised this new version, targeting specific people in order to attempt to sway others who would be opposed to this under most circumstances, to vote for lesser punishments in order to avoid ones of the severity you have proposed. I intend to pass no judgement here, I simply want to spell out what I think is on everybody's minds, that it may be acknowledged, perhaps argued against, and eventually moved past without turning into a festering sore in the minds of some.
This is all I have to say on the matter. -
I just love... by
on 2017-03-18 20:33:00 UTC
Link to this
How people started going "We should change our Board policy so that the Iximaz situation will never happen again", and then promptly turn around and call people who defended them bullies and call for their bans.
For the record, we have confirmed abusers in the PPC community. As an example, palindromordnilap is a repeat offender who has harassed, threatened to doxx, and suicide baited and sent death threats to people.
Why shouldn't we ban those instead? -
IP used by Toroll. Ignore. (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 00:04:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Or, how about... by
on 2017-03-18 20:48:00 UTC
Link to this
A, you use your actual name when making that sort of random attack at Palindromordinlap,
B, you do so in its own thread,
C, you actually provide evidence beyond "trust me they're a terrible person"
And D, you do so on a forum where this stuff actually occurred, rather than trying to drag us into a Kintsugi witch-hunt?
Do I support building a community that's better at detecting and dealing with abusive members? Absolutely. Do I think hijacking an existing high-drama thread with vague, anonymous accusations is going to help with that? Absolutely not. -
I'm willing to apologize, but may I object just a little? by
on 2017-03-18 20:00:00 UTC
Link to this
Not everyone who said anything in the disaster wanted to go through with the Board doxxing. I know didn't. I've said multiple times that I told Aegis via PM not to go through with posting the info on the Board unless it was really needed, with consent, and with all personal information obscured for safety. I had not, to my knowledge, seen any instance of the information in the screencap being called for. I knew it wasn't a good idea to have anything to do with that screenshot; what I didn't know at the time is that the Discord channel is as public as the Board because not only could people who have access pop in and see the screenshot simply by scrolling to the conversation date, but the invite is publicly distributed so that, well, anyone else could. I've stated several times that I cannot apologize enough for not taking action against Tomash, and for doing absolutely nothing about the screencap being put on the Discord in the first place, as hS noted. I'm a busy, busy person, I was working on proofreading multiple academic papers at the time, and my dad was sitting right behind me while all this was happening, so if he so much as glanced in my direction I could be in serious trouble. Hence my relative lack of activity compared to certain other members. I've realized since then that I should've just taken the risk and spoken up against the Discord doxxing in the first place. Hindsight is 20/20, I guess.
With that being said, I have already apologized to the Board at large for not acting when I should have - and for that matter, not directing the actions I did take at the source of the issue - and I am willing to extend my apologies to JulyFlame specifically for the same reason. So, I imagine, would everyone else you've listed who have to do the same thing.
What I am not convinced about, however, is the notion that outright banning a number of people for taking part in a single huge offense is the best choice, especially after they've admitted, repeatedly, that they feel genuinely guilty about their actions. Tomash has stepped down as a chat mod and apologized multiple times to the entire Board for this incident. Granz and Alleb have also stated that they feel awful and that they won't repeat anything even close to this. I believe their words and accept their apologies, but at the same time I do feel that just a simple warning might not be enough. Banning them from the entire PPC community, though, is probably going to do more harm than good, even if said ban is temporary. Even if it was for good reason, I believe it would send the wrong message to those who've just found us and taken a first glance at what's been going on. Permabanning Tomash, who has been apologetic about the doxxing ever since it was first pointed out, could give the impression that you're not willing to listen to his feelings and give him a second chance. The closest I can think of to a metaphorical slap on the wrist would probably be to temporarily kick him and the others who started and/or exacerbated this incident from the Discord, for the amount of time you've proposed for each of them, but still allow them to participate in the PPC community as a whole, thereby at least giving them a chance to learn from their collective mistake. I don't know what other people would think of this, but it's probably the best approach I can think of to penalizing the kickstarting of what was plainly a witch hunt (even if I didn't realize that it was at the time). I repeatedly stated that there was nothing any of us could do to make things better, and I should've added that rampaging after someone else as though they were some sort of scapegoat would ultimately result in a complete and total cataclysm for everyone concerned. I can personally attest to that, having been subject to a witch hunt at least once in the past, and I can say with confidence that we as a community can and should do better than to start anything even close to one.
Be that as it may, I've stated this before in the Discord chat, and I'll state it again here: I am very, very disappointed in and ashamed of this entire clusterflock and the current state of the community in light of it. I joined the PPC in the hopes that it'd be more welcoming than any previous online community I'd known, but my faith in it has been repeatedly shaken, though not yet broken, by things like this happening more than once. In the aftermath of this fiasco, a very small part of me wants to say that if it weren't for my PPC writing responsibilities and the fact that I've made a number of good friends here that I can only contact via the PPC, I'd have walked out on everyone else here without a second thought. It's only a very small part, though, and I know ragequitting would not be helpful to anyone when I , and everyone else, should be striving to make this community a better place for anyone who visits it. (I'm also going to take this moment to say that I'm not even close to interested in being a mod for the Discord channel, having read your earlier opposition to electing anyone who was involved in this mess to that position. I've been through multiple occasions that have demonstrated that I'd make a horrible admin, plus I don't have even half the time to manage the Discord chat when I have so many other things to do as it is.)
Still, we as a community are better than this. We should be, and I hope we can be in the future. As it stands, though, there's still a long way to go before we can repair the damage that's been done to our collective spirit over the past few months, especially the past few days.And honestly, I think it's probably for the better that I distance myself from this whole conversation until my input or intervention is needed. The longer I read this entire mess, the worse I feel. -
Yes, thank you for your input. *slam* (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 19:50:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Have to admit I don't understand this reply. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 19:54:00 UTC
Link to this
-
It's a Sherlock quote. by
on 2017-03-18 19:55:00 UTC
Link to this
Which I made because I do not even slightly care what PC has to say about... basically anything, but particularly this.
-
Why? That seems excessive. by
on 2017-03-18 19:57:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm not exactly pleased by some of what he's had to say, particularly calling for my head, but he's a respectable member of the community with valuable insight.
-
You're right, it probably is excessive. by
on 2017-03-18 20:04:00 UTC
Link to this
I don't care for him or his contributions to the PPC one whit, but that doesn't and shouldn't invalidate his judgement; while I have my reservations about a self-confessed lurker barrelling into a sensitive discussion, this doesn't mean he shouldn't be listened to. This affects everyone in the PPC because it's indicative of cracks in the wall, and that isn't helped by dismissing other viewpoints out of hand. Isn't that what I've been complaining other people do?
(i am a hypocrite. this is not new information.)
PC, I apologise for that. Tempers are running high right now but that is no excuse. -
I have to think this over a while. I'll come back to it. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 19:45:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Also unsure about mentioning Des. by
on 2017-03-18 18:50:00 UTC
Link to this
I mean, he's the one who threatened to go all Stalin on every single person who was even present for the discussion, and I don't think his comments in the chatlog are those of someone who was doing "nothing to stop it".
-
Not sure that is an appropriate choice of words... (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 19:27:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Seconded. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 19:46:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I think targetting me for a ban is a bit unfair. by
on 2017-03-18 18:45:00 UTC
Link to this
Was I critical of July? Yes, very. But I was also on record as opposing the witch hunt and wanting the matter dropped, or at the very least put off for later.
-
Alright... by
on 2017-03-18 18:42:00 UTC
Link to this
On the principle of making a public apology... I accept the idea of doing one for not doing more than one or two statements to Aegis to calm down during this mess, although I'll also tell that I couldn't really do more at the moment, given the fact that despite what my indicator could say, my access to Discord during the week is at the very best sporadic. I didn't have a real opportunity to tell more, I'm working during the week, and that lets me very little time for the PPC, especially when most of the dscussion are during American time.
But... Desdendelle, seriously? He pretty much told how much of a bad idea it was during the entire moment of the discussion he was present, stressing at every turn how wrong it was. How exactly does that account for doing nothing?
Besides... Well, I said my access to the chat was sporadic, but what about other people being automatically connected to Discod because they dowloaded the app but aren't actually following the discussion, or cannot? If they couldn't do something, punishing them for that doesn't seem to be really fair.
As for the apology, I'm ready to make a dedicated post when you see fit. -
Welp, return of the corsair mini. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 19:01:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I have no idea what to say. by
on 2017-03-18 11:01:00 UTC
Link to this
As I am sure you are all well aware, recently I have been distant from the PPC. My job and it's fluctuating hours are in large part to blame for this, as with other real life commitments. By no means was this because I care for the community any less than I ever have. However, clearly I have not been nearly as approachable, nor as good of a friend as I would have liked to be. I have been supposedly active during a number of instances where I should have been a a friend, a means of support, but I was gone. I am so sorry Ix. I should have been a better friend. I don't even know if I deserve that title. I can only hope to be better in the future. I'm so sorry. Truly, I am.
That. All. Being. Said.
Guys.
What are we doing.
I don't like to sick my head into drama. It gets nasty, and I feel this community often guides itself towards the right path sooner or later. However, this time, there has been a while lot of yelling, and not a lot of action. So. Here I am to try and throw my voice in.
First, and foremost, accusations of harassment are extremely serious, and should be treated as such. Our reaction process has been slow in the past, mostly due to inaction on members of the community. I am part of this problem. As stated, I stay out of drama, as I trust cooler heads to judge. So, I feel that we need swifter action to examine and, if necessary, punish those who are harassing other members of this community. Clearly, asking for board-wide approval takes far, far too long for any feeling of closure. For the Discord, this is simple: mods need to bring down kicks harder and sooner. Not necessarily bans, but make it very clear when people have been out of line. Hit them with a warning. Second offense, a kick. Third, a temp ban, potentially permanent depending on severity. Also depending on severity, might skip the warning and jump straight to kicking. Needs to be done, needs to have been done a while ago.
However, for board, and community-wide response, this is trickier. My initial reaction is to have a panel of judges, to overview and determine:
1. Is there a case of wrongdoing
2. How we respond
The natural candidates for these judges are Permission Givers. We already, as a community, trust them to determine who can write in our shared universe. However, my hesitation towards giving them this extra responsibility is that it would put too much onto the plates of these select people. When they signed up for the job, all they asked for was to read stories and say if the author could write reasonably well. Now, we would be asking them to become effectively moderators. We have resisted the use of moderators on the Board for a long time, for many valid reasons. However, I think it has been clearly shown that we need faster, more decisive judgement. Moderators seem to be the best way of doing that.
Now, onto the issue of banning people right now. In my view, there is only one person who should possibly, maybe, be banned, and that is Tomash. Now, in my view, he has been shamed enough, has been shown quite thoroughly the error of his ways, and has profusely apologized for what he has done. Do not take this to mean I endorse what he did. It was a despicable act, and I do not blame those who want to see him banned. But, in my view, he has gone though enough. Consider this a NO BAN vote, but I will not object if we rule to ban.
However, the others on Desdendelle's little list: under no circumstances should they be banned at all. If I believe Tomash has received enough of a beating, lord knows I am not in favor of harsh punishment towards those members of the community either. Now, let me make this very, very clear. If you stood by while somebody was doxxed, or heaven help me, endorsed it at the time, you were in the severe wrong. What was done was immoral to a high degree, and may in fact be illegal. Shame on you. However, that is all that reprimand that should be done on these members. I feel this extreme outburst we have had as a community shows how we feel about the subject: we do not approve, and will not allow it to happen again. If it does, for any reason, to anybody, after this little debacle? I might be less forgiving. However, for now, we as a community need to heal. And we don't heal and repair by banning half the user base.
So, in conclusion, I feel it is high time this community has official moderators, who are elected to judge and enforce rules on behalf of the community at large. We have been too slow before. It is time to change it. Other then that, no changes needed to the Constitution. I feel that particular document is very, very clear and very well-written. Far more so than any other online community I can think of. We just need people to enforce it. -
Moderators are not the solution. by
on 2017-03-18 13:23:00 UTC
Link to this
Moderators are not the solution. The solution is for every person in this community to do what we've said all along that they should be doing:
10. The PPC as a community is responsible for upholding the Constitution. If following Article 7 doesn't resolve a situation, any and all uninvolved community members have a responsibility to back up the person who is in the right, or to defuse an unclear situation. It is never wrong to ask a third party to comment on a dispute, but try to find someone uninvolved; a mediator will be more useful for resolving a dispute than a supporter.
When Iximaz and July had their argument, I talked to both of them, and helped July with her apology. When July and Matt Cipher had their argument, I talked to both of them and helped Matt with his apology. When Iximaz and GlarnBoudin had their argument, I looked at what was said and offered an opinion - and when my view was challenged, I reconsidered it and posted that I had. When Desdendelle shamed Iximaz, I spoke up. When I heard July had been doxxed, I got hold of the chat logs and spoke up.
I do not stand by. I do not let things happen. You may disagree with the conclusions I draw, the actions I suggest, the blame I lay or withhold, but you can never point at me and say I just ignore problems. If everybody in this community can do the same, this will never happen again.
And I want desperately for that to happen. This place, this Board and this PPC, is something precious, something unique. It's a place where we don't look to authority to keep us in check, but where we take responsibility for our own actions, and where we stand up for our friends when they are attacked. It's a place where we want to know the facts before we form our opinions - and when new information comes to light or our views are challenged, we don't lash out, but reconsider and reevaluate.
That's what I believe. That's the PPC I have stood for, for nearly fifteen years now. That's the community I trust every one of you to stand up for.
I want to give a huge shout-out to ninny4370 here. They are literally the newest person here, but they have stood up and called out the problem they see, and what they think we should do about it. I may not agree with what they suggest, but I am immensely impressed that they are saying it.
hS -
Myabe this could wait? by
on 2017-03-18 11:29:00 UTC
Link to this
Everyone right now is very tense due to this. I would recommend waiting a few days before implementing those actions.
-
We need to cool off by
on 2017-03-18 08:04:00 UTC
Link to this
Posting for the third time now, I want everyone who is part of the PPC to not post anything on the board related to the incident that happened. What everyone needs to do is cool down and rethink and let the emotions subside.
I am only posting this because I have seen multiple people post on the board expressing their disgust and using words most commonly used in desperation or when the person is not thinking straight. -
I have some thoughts. by
on 2017-03-18 06:19:00 UTC
Link to this
These thoughts might not mean all that much to most of you, as I have largely receded into semi-lurker status, but I need to express them regardless. Good job, folks. You've really ticked me off.
First off, Iximaz? I am sorry for everything you are going through. It's obviously a difficult time for you, and you have my sympathy. Get well soon.
Now then, as for those involved in the railroading of JulyFlame… screw you. Screw you all. Sorry, I tried to think of something diplomatic to say, but I'm coming off of a nasty illness and pretty much coughed up the last of my available diplomacy this morning. What on Earth possessed you all to do something so craven, so stupid, so… very much against the spirit of this community? I certainly see a lot of excuses being cited by those involved: fear, anger, good intentions. Great, yeah. Acting on those has never backfired on anyone ever.
But I'm sure most of you just wanted what was best for your friend. Fair enough. I would hope that you all learn a lesson from this. If nothing else, you might learn to stop before you do something and consider how what you say, or what you write, might hurt someone. Maybe not the person you're talking to, but someone. Somewhere. Remember, this is the Internet.
On a personal note, I would like to share with you all how utterly disappointed I am to see the community as it is now. There are a couple of unnamed people in this thread whose actions and excuses have downright disgusted me. I would hope that those people come to their senses, but I sincerely doubt they will.
Regarding the open Discord mod positions, I say this: I will oppose the appointment or election of anyone to that position who was involved in this incident. And it will be a vocal opposition.
Sometime tomorrow morning, I will be posting a revised ban proposal. It will not be as… dramatic as Desdendelle's, but it will exist and it will be serious. What occurred was a violation of privacy, of confidentiality, of trust. Some sort of corrective action needs to be taken. -
I'd like to bounce this off everyone. by
on 2017-03-18 00:16:00 UTC
Link to this
Wikipedia has this thing called an interaction ban. Basically, it's an enforced agreement not to interact with each otheR. Maybe agreement isn't the best term but I can't think of a better one right now. Anyways, if the two people involved start talking again more consequences happen.
My question is:
Would this be a good idea in the context of the PPC? -
Probably not. by
on 2017-03-18 00:21:00 UTC
Link to this
To be it seems a bit too extreme, and if two people really don't want anything to do with each other they'll just refuse to interact on their own accord.
-
Bans. by
on 2017-03-17 23:09:00 UTC
Link to this
The things that were done to July here were absolutely despicable. Doxxing someone is not only illegal, it's highly immoral, and in this case it might put July in direct danger. I demand that everybody involved in that discussion be banned forthwith. If I need to be banned as well (whether as part of that discussion or for some other reason) then so be it.
I call for the ban of Tomash. I call for the ban of Alleb. I call for the ban of Akrinor. I call for the ban of Granz. I call for the ban of palindromordnilap. I call for the ban of Storme Hawk. I call for the ban of Khryssty. I call for the ban of Matt Cipher. I call for the ban of Ekyl. I call for the ban of SkarmorySilver. I call for the ban of Silenthunder. I call for the ban of Jay - Awesomeness Central. I call for the ban of Hardric. I call for the ban of Aegis. Finally, if I need to be banned as well, then so be it.
This community should be ashamed that it let such disgusting behaviour come to pass. This community should send the strongest possible message that this sort of behaviour will not be tolerated. This community owes July at least a modicum of justice. -
Okay, Trigger-happy Inquisitor... by
on 2017-03-18 11:59:00 UTC
Link to this
Let me run you over some of the logs you've clearly ignored in your blind rage of getting all of those people banned.
Akrinor-Yesterday at 12:11 PM
Actually, in a way it is part of exactly the can of worms we're about to open. But I agree with not putting the convo on board.
palindromordnilap-Yesterday at 11:32 AM
You should probably censor July's name and face.
Ekyl-Yesterday at 12:11 PM
If July wanted her real name known on the board, she would go by it.
Granz-Yesterday at 12:11 PM
We could quote the conversation.
Instead of using the screenshot.
Matt Cipher-Yesterday at 12:12 PM
I agree that showing face and real name is not cool and disrespectful. (...)
SkarmorySilver-Yesterday at 12:10 PM
And IMHO, putting that chat screencap in public view would be extremely disrespectful to all parties involved, which won't help anybody's case.
The only time you see Silenthunder joining that specific convo is when she says she agrees that the whole policy should be changed. Not even once does she say anything about JulyFlame or the screenshot.
But I guess it's easier to say all of them are guilty. Whatever. If you feel better about yourself, go ahead. Do your worst and ban me. -
Hola. by
on 2017-03-18 06:14:00 UTC
Link to this
I was barely present during this discussion, mainly because I found it disturbing, and my only interventions wer about calming down and thinking hard before doing something really harsh.
-
More elaborated reaction. by
on 2017-03-18 06:49:00 UTC
Link to this
I've got a rather bad habit of not speaking and avoiding problems when I face them. And could barely see both Discord and the Board at all during the last days, since I was at work, had to go to sleep early (10 PM here in Europa), and time zones are there.
This whole quagmire felt and feels incredibly wrong to me, both the issues raised, and the sheer explosion caused, meaning I barely posted because I thought the Board and Discord were too hostile for me.
The only moment I was resent on Discord and able to say something... Well first that was to ask for the situation. Then there was the... duck subtlety, stalinian process against July.
Unless my memory is driving me nuts, I spoke only twice during this whole debacle, and I was aiming for Aegis to calm down.
Des was telling him on all the tones what he was doing wasn't a good idea in any univrse, and Aegis didn't bulge. One of my two interventions was bouncing off on a reply Nyme had posted to stress the just wrong aspects of his demarch and got him to think really hard before doing it.
He said he would take time to calm down, so that somewhat worked, and didn't did anything more, both for a lack of time and a no envy at all to go in a discussion which showed all signs of going to total toxicity.
I didn't posted here when I could have the time here before that because of said bad habit of not wanting to be near violent discussions. That's all. I guess that's weakness and a default, but approbation for toxic self-destruction it's not. At all. -
What did I say about not burning down the Board? by
on 2017-03-18 05:56:00 UTC
Link to this
Not that I expected anyone to take that seriously, but if this isn't the Board on fire, I don't know what is.
Look. I agree that Tomash must go up for a ban. I say this with deep regret, because I have always liked and respected Tomash up til now, I'd miss him, and I recognize that losing him likely means losing T-Board as well, but if anyone with a lesser reputation had done this thing, and if the victim had been anyone less controversial than July, it would not even be a question; it would be done. It cannot be overstated that this indiscretion is potentially life-threatening to July, who is active in the military, which does have enemies. The rules for her are not the same as for someone who is a private citizen. This is no mere hypothetical situation; this is not just "Internet drama." This is f**king serious, and if I could swear properly, I would, so that you would know I mean it.
The rest, though? I don't know. My gut instinct says it's overkill, but I haven't had time to go through the logs, because sometimes I have to work during the day and keeping up with the Board has been hard enough.
Don't get me wrong, I am extremely disappointed in a lot of you, and I find myself distrusting live chatrooms again, seeing as this is the second time I've seen one apparently become an echo chamber where a subsection of the community worked itself into a frenzied mob bent on persecuting one certain member on dubious charges.
I find it somewhat ironic that people in this thread were crying for more aggressive censure of wrongdoers, and then the minute Des tests that resolve to its natural extent, he gets such fierce backlash.
I'll try to get properly caught up tomorrow. Just... for f**k's sake, you guys, this is beyond stupid. I know you know that, I just need to say it for me.
~Neshomeh -
Honestly by
on 2017-03-18 07:40:00 UTC
Link to this
You do not have to distrust live chat rooms because of this incident, yes the incident is overkill, but we need to cool off for a few days. Right now, emotions are on the fly.
-
I wish I agreed. by
on 2017-03-18 17:06:00 UTC
Link to this
It's not just this incident, though. It's everything that I've observed tends to happen in an environment where people feel they're behind closed doors and don't have to consider their words and edit themselves before they speak. It's much easier for things to get blown out of proportion in that environment. Up til now I've thought this group might be better than that, but honestly, when emotions run high and mob mentality kicks in, the group is only as smart as the lowest common denominator. I'm not pulling that out of my butt—I actually took a class on it in college. Hence, while I still think the people as individuals are mostly just fine, I distrust the environment that encourages groupthink.
~Neshomeh -
My brief two cents. by
on 2017-03-18 03:44:00 UTC
Link to this
Looking back at all of this, I have to agree with both sides of the argument here. Yes, doxxing is horrible and does not deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as any PPC boarder. Heck, it does not deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence as anybody's Internet usernames anywhere, period. It's put lives at risk in the past, and a quick look at the article about it on Wikipedia has confirmed that it's actually led to the deaths of almost a dozen people since the 1990's. On a more personal level, when I got involved in drama a few years ago, I started worrying, albeit irrationally, that I'd be doxxed by at least a few of the others involved and suffer physical harm, or worse. I would never consider doxxing anyone I've fallen out with online, ever.
That being said, outright banning everyone involved in the entire discussion, even those who weren't there to see the screencap fiasco, will solve absolutely nothing and, I fear, may continue putting us in a negative light. Sure, I did chime in a few times when said screencap happened, but I only realized the gravity of what was going down at the time long after the fact. While I did drop out of the conversation due to being busy with personal matters, I PM'd Aegis later on and told him that I was firmly on your side, that this information should not be released publicly, and that doing so would come back to hurt everyone involved and couldn't be retracted. In hindsight I realize that a better course of action would have been to talk to Tomash directly and to tell him to delete the screencap from the Discord chat as well as his computer files if applicable (which is most likely the case). I apologize for not doing so immediately and also for not making a public attempt to decry the screencap incident while it was happening. My awful time management skills do not excuse the fact that I did nothing to stop this and if I have to deal with the consequences of my nonaction then I'm willing to accept them.
With that being said, however, outright banning every single participant in the whole conversation, including yourself, seems like an act of haste, and likely anger over the whole incident, as justified as it was. I don't know if the ban is from the Discord chat or from the PPC in its entirety, but shutting people out of this community just because they either were led by herd mentality to make a collective mistake will send a very bad message to anyone who happens upon the Board or other PPC-affiliated places online and thinks that we drop the banhammer willy-nilly for committing just one perceived offense.
I don't disagree that what Tomash did was unimaginably wrong, and I don't disagree that ganging up on July was just as bad. But making propositions out of sheer anger is likely to do more harm than good, especially in circumstances as dubious as this. I hope we can all learn from this, end this vicious cycle, and find a better way to handle drama, bullying, and general grossness, but I personally think insta-banning half the currently active PPC community because of one disastrous conversation is anything but that way. -
Alright, I've been snarky enough. by
on 2017-03-18 03:41:00 UTC
Link to this
I thought someone with authority here might step in and just say this was ridiculous, so since no one has, I shall voice my entirely un-authoritative opinion on the matter, which I do believe I made clear below.
This is ridiculous.
I won't speak on my own ban, because I think I made it clear enough (flippantly, but I don't think I was in the wrong) to talk about Tomash.
Yes, he made a mistake. No one here is denying that. But I also think taking away his position as a moderator is punishment enough. This is considering he posted a screenshot he shouldn't have posted in the heat of the moment when he assumed his friend was dead is not an action that calls for a ban.
Namely, because I don't see bans in this instance as a method for punishing people, but ways to eliminate nuisances from the PPC as a whole. I think that, on balance, Tomash's presence is a constructive one.
In summary I think that stripping him of modship is punishment enough, because what I see isn't indicative of a malicious presence in the PPC. -
A change of views. by
on 2017-03-18 03:52:00 UTC
Link to this
After a great deal of reflection, and more than a few conversations with certain parties, I agree that Tomash need not be banned, even if there is some punishment further than a loss of modship. What this further punishment would be, I am at a loss to.
However, I do stand by one earlier statement of mine. If we do impose a ban on Tomash, since this is, in essence, a retroactive application of the law, if anybody currently active has been accused of either revealing private information of another PPCer or harassing another PPCer, we should investigate those cases and try them according to the new methods. -
I'd like to... confess, I suppose. by
on 2017-03-18 02:03:00 UTC
Link to this
Here's what I did wrong:
I participated in what has been deemed a witch-hunt. I helped direct the witch-hunt (see VM's post). This was wrong.
I didn't stand up, didn't speak, when July was doxxed. This was wrong.
I didn't try to calm tempers; I inflamed them, and was inflamed myself. This was wrong.
I have a few words in my defense, but they don't absolve me. Namely, I've chatted with July before, and I've seen the info in the screenshot before. Thus, when I saw the screenshot, I didn't think, "July has been doxxed." Doesn't excuse me--heck, it's more evidence that I wasn't thinking things through--but for me, at least, it wasn't new info. "I didn't really think about it" isn't exactly an excuse, though.
I was also worried about Ixi at the time, but that's no excuse, either. In fact, this worry should have made me more sensitive to others being wronged. But it didn't. I was an idiot.
Listen. I love this community. I spend a lot of my time here; I have a lot of friends here. I don't want to be banned. But what I did was wrong. I don't think July deserves this. July certainly didn't deserve to have any info posted--that goes without saying. We should all step back and calm down.
So... yeah. I've got to say, I don't think I deserve a ban. I was wrong, I did wrong, but I didn't have malicious intent. I thought that there were grievances to be addressed. So I'm going to ask that I not be banned--but that decision lies entirely with the community.
I'm going to step back for a few days. I'll be available for PM and Hangouts, but I won't be on the Board or in the main Discord chat. I'll let you all come to an agreement.
One last thing. Um, I know most of you aren't Christians, but Proverbs 15 sort of slapped me in the face. It's what I should have been doing this whole time, but didn't. It's worth a read.
-Alleb -
Bans, huh? by
on 2017-03-18 01:38:00 UTC
Link to this
Well, firstly, Tomash. I cannot myself make a judgement on whether what he did was illegal or not, but it was, in my opinion, a bad idea at the very least, and immoral and malicious at the very worst, although I do not think it goes that far. As he has resigned, I say ban him for a period no shorter than two weeks, but no longer than two months. This will give him long enough to think on his actions without being overly harsh.
As to myself, if I am banned, I will make no argument against it. I do not particularly wish to be, but seeing as yesterday, I made decisions out of fear and anger and, even if I did think revealing July's name and face were going too far, I did not speak out against it at the time. I do not know if I can be trusted without some form of punishment.
However, as to everybody else, I know some were not on for the entire thing. Aegis, especially, I believe was mostly there to notify us that Ix was alive. Furthermore, those who were there for the majority of the discussion were attempting to steer it into an actual discussion, not a witch-hunt, and several advocated at least taking this to the Board. And here is when I make a point about mass bans. The thing about Discord is, it's ridiculously easy to make a server. I made one in about a minute. Should we decide to invoke a mass ban, it would take me about ten to send off invites to everybody who has been banned, essentially splitting the PPC in two. I might not even use the dang thing, but my point is, you wouldn't really be punishing anybody, especially given that all it takes is a third person to put two people back in contact, creating an underground network that means that nobody is banned, ever. Such things only work when you have one or two toxic people who the group collectively agrees to remove from themselves and not speak to. Attempting this method would undermine the implementation of such systems in the future. -
Another note. by
on 2017-03-18 03:06:00 UTC
Link to this
Should a ban be issued against Tomash, I suggest that any previous cases involving harassment or the revelation of private information of any PPC members be re-examined and judged according to the new system it appears would rise from this thread.
-
I resign my modship of the Discord, effective immediately by
on 2017-03-18 01:20:00 UTC
Link to this
I have made an extremely glaring oversight and serious mistake in posting that screenshot. I again deeply apologize for what I have done.
In the discussion about that, it has become clear that the PPC does not trust my judgment or my ability to hold power because of my rash action yesterday. I would only like to say that I do not believe that my extremely unacceptable actions to be illegal.
This, however, leaves us with a lack of moderators that are active during the evenings in the United States (since Iximaz has also resigned and Cat-on-the-Keyboard is not very active). Would someone be so kind as to nominate my replacement? -
As mentioned in the Discord chat... by
on 2017-03-18 01:27:00 UTC
Link to this
I nominate GMA and Storme Hawk to the positions rendered vacant by yourself and Ix
-
Belatedly, I have to decline that nomination. by
on 2017-03-19 01:23:00 UTC
Link to this
- I'm too new. I don't know much about how the PPC works, or how people should behave.
2. In my opinion, the ideal mod would be someone who already tells people that what they're doing is Not Cool/against the rules. Because I didn't do exactly that on several occasions even in the short time I've been here, I can't accept being a mod in good conscience; I wouldn't do enough with it if something were to come up.
- I'm too new. I don't know much about how the PPC works, or how people should behave.
-
As much as I am honoured to be thought of for this. by
on 2017-03-18 03:38:00 UTC
Link to this
I personally do not believe I am worthy enough of being a mod on the Discord channel.
If you and a number of others disagree with me then I will take the burden up. But personally I think that there are other members of this community who would be a better mod than I. -
Alternatively... by
on 2017-03-18 01:35:00 UTC
Link to this
As per currently ongoing discussions in the Discord, I also nominate Aegis, Delta Juliette, and/or Maslab
-
... If nobody else steps up, I could maybe do it (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 01:27:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Interesting. by
on 2017-03-18 00:28:00 UTC
Link to this
So you propose to ban basically everyone in that conversation.
Firstly, as Tomash said, most of us did not know wether Ix had taken their own life, so I think it's viable to say that we all might just have been a little bit tense at that time, as well as on the verge of panicking.
Secondly, a big part of the later conversation was sparked by Aegis asking you to contact JulyFlame, since you had her contact info and asking for her consent on posting the conversation on the board. All the time while you were accusing us of not even trying to get her side of the story, when it was quite clearly part of what we were trying to do.
Lastly, even if you were justified in your calls for bans, if I recall correctly, in most cases the Constitution actually doesn't allow bans for "first offenders", which, if I am not mistaken, would constitute most of those you called out, barring actual illegal activity, which, except in Tomash's case, did not apply. I think the exact phrase used was "Everyone deserves a second chance.".
~Ak
P.S. I do agree that what Tomash did was wrong, and that he at the very least should lay down his duties as a mod,; however I do understand why he did it. -
As someone who has actually seen the whole chat... by
on 2017-03-18 00:20:00 UTC
Link to this
I actually see Des' point here.
What was going in that discussion was disgusting. And no, I am not going to accept the "we didn't know if Iximaz was even alive" thing - they continued well after the reveal that Ix was alright.
And what I saw made me so scared I failed to take action. I didn't stop the nastyness against July. I did only a pathetic attempt at rebuking the accusations against Huinesoron (which I'm afraid it was read as me willing to bop hS if he were to pass the thing as nothing, when I meant that if hS were to be like that I would be disappointed because that simply wouldn't have been the hS I know). I failed to help Desdendelle try to get people to reason.
I was afraid I would just become the next target, as I could be easily passed off as one of the "July-covering oldbies"
So I believe some kind of action is needed. I don't believe we should decide what right now, and of course we should look into actual individual responsibilites and not simply bring down the ban-hammer with the same setting on everyone - a couple days for cooling down before taking a decision, as ninny suggested, might be the best thing to do now.
But the sheer amount of hate I saw in that chat should not be treated lighly, and should not be let pass. -
I'll respond here. by
on 2017-03-18 00:30:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm generally opposed to bans, but here I agree some need to be handed down. First, Tomash. I largely agree with Seafarer above. But I am not sure it goes far enough. I do not think 6 months is enough, this is illegal behavior, and a very clear message needs to be sent that that is unacceptable in all circumstances. I do not know if a permanent ban is required, but we need a strong response.
I actually also second one, or at least some form of discipline for Alleb and Granz as well in this case. While I agree that there should not be guilt by association, both of them did definitively ask for the private information be released. Which is also wrong.
As for the rest of them I do not think anything they did quite rises to the level of significant discipline. Unless we are starting to punish for inaction now.
But bottom line is that conversation was absolutely disgusting and SHOULD NOT be tolerated. If this community is willing to tolerate that kind of behavior then we need to reevaluate. -
You're a law student, aren't you? by
on 2017-03-18 00:36:00 UTC
Link to this
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the default stance of doxxing seems to be "not illegal unless it's releasing home address, SSN, etc" and full names, while not morally acceptable, is not actually illegal.
I do agree that Tomash should lose his modship (and before anyone points fingers at me, I announced my own resignation below), and possibly have a temporary ban, but treating him like a criminal when he didn't do anything illegal that I'm aware of seems a bit much. -
My response by
on 2017-03-18 00:51:00 UTC
Link to this
Internet law is not my specialty, but there are multiple issues involved with doxing. You have actual federal crimes involved in some circumstances, you have state crimes, and you absolutely have privacy rights at issue.
From what I understand the message posted included both a real name and contact information. That is not acceptable. At a minimum it was a private conversation. And from what I understand neither party to that conversation agreed to its release.
And for the record, I am not treating him as a criminal per-se. I think that there should be some level of disciplinary action taken. Regardless of the legality of the conduct, it is still a flagrant violation of, if not the letter, the spirit of the constitution. -
Partial Retraction by
on 2017-03-18 01:08:00 UTC
Link to this
Though it does come to me after the fact that some of my language may have been too strong, and given that I am not certain, I retract the part of my comment regarding the mentioning it as illegal. I cannot confirm or deny if that raises to that level. So for that I apologize.
That being said, it was still a blatant violation of our rules. And the punishment is still warranted. -
Hate seems a bit much. by
on 2017-03-18 00:22:00 UTC
Link to this
If I'd say anything signifies hatred, it's Des wanting to wipe out every single person who was even present for the discussion.
-
I vote no ban. by
on 2017-03-17 23:47:00 UTC
Link to this
To all of those except Tomash.
I read the logs. I know that what Tomash did was awful. But I say no to guilt by association.
Here's what I say: strip Tomash of mod powers. Ban him for at least six months. Actions like his which are not only immoral but actually illegal have to be punished, or there is no justice in the community.
(Actually, I might be convinced of a lesser ban for anyone implying that July deserved it for her actions - innocent until proven guilty and punishment must fit the crime and all that. But I only saw one or two people even getting close to that.)
And with that... we need to let this go. July's not here to defend herself, so any investigation into her actions cannot continue. Right now, we need to work out how to deal with this sort of thing in future and then set it in stone, in the rules. -
I have reviewed the thread. by
on 2017-03-18 01:03:00 UTC
Link to this
There are a couple of people I think action needs to be taken against.
First, Khryssty said (paraphrased) "It's okay to dox someone if they're a bully". That isn't on.
I think I also saw Granz expressing similar views.
Then there was Scapegrace's little rant about hS. That was just complete disrespect for someone who wasn't there to answer, and who has in my experience always been calm and patient, listening to everyone's versions of events before making a call. I see that Scape and hS have talked about that, though.
Then I saw Des say "I don't think accusing July of bullying is right." And, uh, that isn't okay either. That's basically saying that July is somehow above the rules against bullying. I'm sure Des didn't mean it that way, but man. That alongside Des's lofty, dismissive tone and words (towards Aegis especially) have caused me to lose the respect I had for him.
Soooo... I wouldn't be averse to action being taken against the individuals named above, in addition to Tomash. -
I mostly agree with Seafarer here. by
on 2017-03-18 03:31:00 UTC
Link to this
Perhaps with a lessening on Tomash's ban, as due to the conversation with EvilAI, whether his actions were actually illegal or not is a bit of a grey area.
As to my actions, I would first like to say that, baring one post of Alleb's that I agreed with, I did not target July, nor did I intend to target July with anything that I said that day. I was there when it all... kicked off (admittedly it was around 4-5 in the morning for me and I hadn't gone to sleep yet so I wasn't sure what to expect upon waking up). As I now frequently do, I logged onto Discord on Thursday in the school library after a rather important meeting about my future on my course (not that it's that important, I just like putting all the details in (BTW it went well)), and I got on somewhere around 4pm (4:18pm is when I make my first post to be precise) and coming into the middle of the conversation, promptly forgot about the work I was meant to be doing and went to read up on everything that had happened (and then proceed to swear a lot at what had happened, silently of course (I was still in the library after all)).
Then at 4:21pm I make my first post, in which I'm generally talking about Ix's leaving post on the board, specifically expressing a wish to post something despite not really being around for much of what Ix was talking about apart from the Glarn incidents and I quote "but I know saying that to Ix will make it sound as if I was ignoring them, and I'm left in a really difficult place." I then also expressed interest in hearing SeaTurtle's side of the Brink incident, mostly because out of the three other people still in the PPC at that time who were involved with the incident, SeaTurtle is the one I trust, and think of as my friend, the most (No offence meant to Ekyl and Zingenmir).
After six or so minutes, I then make this post, in reference to the new rules that may or may not be introduced.
"Part of me wonders if it would be better for us to instead of keep fixing up the Constitution to scrap it and rebuild it from scratch, and then have some way of actually keeping people to it so that bullies are fittingly punished."
And I honestly mean it, and I still do believe that what I said could be a good solution. I was trying to have an actual discussion about whether our current Constitution really, truly works for cases of bullying, and whilst I will admit I didn't have a copy of the Constitution next to me, or open on my browser at all. I honestly think that we need to change it, at least in part, to make sure nothing like this (both the whole incident surround Ix, and the consequences of it and the whole mess (for I don't know a better way of putting it) that it has caused afterwards.
Then came my big mistake. I agreed with Alleb when they stated. "The image itself should probably be posted." We all know the image that is being talked about, and now coming back to it, I realize I should of said more than just "^". I should of said, as I believed it would have been understood at the time, that the proper consent would be given before the image was posted and, due to the fact I have never (and probably now will never) use Hangouts (or whatever it was), I did not realize said image would contain a picture of July and they're name, I believed it'd contain, much like on Discord some kind of profile picture and a username similar to the ones we use in the PPC. I was ignorant, and I should of said more than I did, I'll admit I'm guilty to that much.
A minute or two later I responded to Granz's post of:
"Do we include specific articles dealing with punishment in the Constitution, should we rewrite It? How specific do we get? How do we actually put it into practice? And seconding the posting of the image."
With:
"Yes, there should be articles in the Constitution about the punishment, so that those who think they'll be able to get away with bullying others will know exactly what will happen to them in turn."
With regards to my previous post saying about redoing the Constitution. I'll admit, reading that back I sound like a bit of a dick, it could come across as a bit hard (I generally am towards bullies, for reasons I mention later), but once again this was me trying to have a discussion about redoing the Constitution, this wasn't aimed towards anyone specifically, it was about honestly believing (at that time) that parts of the Constitution are flawed and need to be changed to help better prevent and punish bullies in the community. I then also follow up with
"We need to take a hard fast stance on bullies or else we might as well not take a stance at all."
Granz then asked a couple of questions that I didn't (and still don't) have a proper answer to. As far as I was aware, for this part of the conversation we were having a discussion about potentially redoing the Constitution itself, and whether that would actually work. I respond with my reasons for my stance on bullying.
"I was bullied for 11 years of my life because my teachers thought the best thing to do when an act of bullying was reported was to gather the two parties in a room and tell the bullies to, and I quote "Not do that again." And then send us on our ways." I'll admit, I'm not the most comfortable to post this on the internet at large, but I think it needs to be said to understand where I come from with regards to bullies (And for those who are interested, I'm currently 22, so yes, that is half my life I've been bullied. But once again, this (to me) merely justifies my stance towards bullies and basically nothing else).
In response to Khryssty's very fair questions of "What worries me is the degree of waffling this has revealed in the community. Will I really be safe here?"
I responded with: "You'll be safe, that is one thing I would always promise to uphold (and always do)" And it's true that I try and do that, and that I try and be firm but fair when I am called upon to settle disputes in the other corners of the internet that I hang out in, however rarely it happens these days. I realize that this could be read as "I want to rule the board/PPC with an iron fist." I don't, far from it. I am just saying that I try and make sure everyone feels safe whenever I can.
I make a couple of little comments before mentioning "Yeah, and also some people don't know about certain situations because they simply weren't there for them. So how can they comment on it if they don't know about it?" In response to (for me) the fact that in Ix's leaving post (I mean no offense here) I felt like they were blaming everyone in the PPC for either taking part in, or not standing by her during the three incidents that she had mentioned, I was trying to counter-claim by saying that, if one is not there, how can they be blamed for something, unless it explicitly happens because they are not there. I then continue on this tangent with "Yes you can read up on it after it has happened, but that doesn't help if a decision is needed then and there." before realizing it was indeed a tangent and deciding to shelve it away for later.
I make some comment about needing groundwork before we are able to continue, in which I was talking about if we were to redo things to do with how we handle bullying, nothing more or less. Then I make my other point that I think still applies (and shows that even on 5 hours sleep and with some stressful things happening earlier in the day I can still make up intelligent comments).
"We need to see past oldbie, middlebie, whatever. Just because they've been around a while doesn't mean they can't be held responsible for what they've done. If hS did something really rude and wrong I'd want him to be held accountable for it (for example)."
hS was just an example, it wasn't meant to be anything related to Scape's comments, it was merely because hS was the oldest-bie I could think of whose name (or shortened version thereof) I could spell relatively quickly. But it is a good point, sure respect your elders, but also remember that elders aren't always right, and that just because you've been here longer than someone else doesn't make you more right, or more in the right than someone who hasn't been here as long. I mean look at me, I count as an oldbie (somehow), and yet in some ways still feel like I should be treated as more of a middlebie (and even newbie in some cases) than an oldbie. But that's just me I guess.
It was at this point I needed to go off to my lecture (Yay, deriving the Black Scholes formula). I then returned somewhere around 6:20pm (ish) and kinda lurked on Discord (as well as reading what had been said in my absence) by which point it'd mostly died down.
So yeah, that's my side of things (in one giant post that I feel really sorry for anyone who has just read through it all. I'm aware the grammar is probably atrocious, I'm sorry). I'm not going to try and say I was definitely in the right, or definitely in the wrong. For the most part I was trying to have a discussion about how to better the PPC and the Constitution to prepare against something like this happening again.
If that is wrong, ban me, but I refuse to just accept being nominated for a ban because I felt that this had pointed some glaring holes in our community that NEED to be fixed and thought I would say something about it. And whilst I am strongly tempted to nominate Desdendelle for a ban as well, I refuse to, partially because I feel like falling to that level is inherently wrong, and SHOULD NOT BE DONE. And also because I recognize his point of view, and likewise July's POV, I may not respect it, I may not like it, but I will defend to the death their right to say it.
Storme Hawk
Who would have posted this in half the time if their 'o' key worked more than half the time. -
I agree. by
on 2017-03-17 23:39:00 UTC
Link to this
In fact, let's ban everyone. Dissolve the PPC. That takes care of the problem.
-
Ya bought this bozo back, Des. Happy now? (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 23:49:00 UTC
Link to this
-
"Anonymous" is the default if you don't input a handle. by
on 2017-03-17 23:51:00 UTC
Link to this
This could be a different person.
-
Same M.O. Same goal. by
on 2017-03-17 23:54:00 UTC
Link to this
It's Toroll.
-
anyway, it doesn't work because Toroll is Desdendelle (nm by
on 2017-03-17 23:57:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Do not feed the troll. (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 23:57:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Do you wish for Tor-troll posts to be deleted? (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 07:26:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Yes, please. Purge the copycat (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 07:32:00 UTC
Link to this
-
You are a banned user. Please leave. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 07:37:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Try again! ^^ (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 23:55:00 UTC
Link to this
-
*shrug* by
on 2017-03-17 23:56:00 UTC
Link to this
You're using Tor. You're trolling. You're Toroll, regardless of whether you're the original or a sad copycat.
-
Definitely a copycat. by
on 2017-03-18 07:18:00 UTC
Link to this
And I'm insulted by the idea that I might possibly be Desdendelle. To dispel this notion I have no problem unmasking. While I find this whole thread wildly amusing, mostly because Data was right about July being a bully and Des being a fool the whole time, I have not been involved lately because honestly you lot aren't worth my time anymore since Data left.
Also, don't bother banning this IP, though I'm sure you will anyway. This is a 24-our coffee shop several miles from my home. -
Yes, but... by
on 2017-03-17 23:54:00 UTC
Link to this
Their actions are in line with one we all know and love
-
Okay, No. by
on 2017-03-17 23:32:00 UTC
Link to this
While I definitely think that Tomash should be knocked a good month into the future w/ the Ol' Ban Hammer for that little leak, banning that many people feels like it might be a tad overkill.
I believe the aforementioned Tomash said it best: "Please keep in mind that during most of the beginning of that log, the people talking were unsure whether Iximaz was alive and therefore under a lot of emotional stress." -
*bemused eyebrow* Banned, eh? by
on 2017-03-17 23:27:00 UTC
Link to this
I do think I understand, but again, my biases prevent my saying anything. Wouldn't want to be banned, after all. My hands are tied, really.
-
Dude. Really. Really? That's what you're going with? (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 23:27:00 UTC
Link to this
-
How about a nice cup of cocoa and a sit down instead, dear? (nm) by
on 2017-03-17 23:24:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Are you out of your mind?! by
on 2017-03-17 23:23:00 UTC
Link to this
Banning people, including yourself is not the answer! Even though I may be a newbie, this cannot pass. This is not the right thing to do, banning them because they were in the DISCUSSION is going to far.
-
Oi, I wasn't even involved! by
on 2017-03-17 23:11:00 UTC
Link to this
Maybe don't go full bloodthirsty, eh? I was on your side of the disgussion.
-
An semi-related thing that needs to be said. by
on 2017-03-17 16:58:00 UTC
Link to this
The Discord chat (or specifically, the people present yesterday) owe(s) July and apology for the witch hunt conducted against her yesterday. I don't think a discussion about bullying can be held in clear conscience while that's still in the air.
-
I'm sorry, but I don't think it was a witch hunt. by
on 2017-03-17 20:57:00 UTC
Link to this
I've been trying to stay out of this since I think it's a community issue and not a personal one, but I really can't anymore.
Yes, Tomash posted a screenshot he really shouldn't have. I've discussed this with him, and he's genuinely regretful for doing so without the consent of both parties, which, if you'll examine the logs, I believe you'll find we later discussed thoroughly.
I can't speak for the Discord, but I believe I'm not alone in that when I saw the post in the Discord, I believed that the damage had been done, and felt it would be buried quickly enough in the chat that anyone joining wouldn't see it unless we kept talking about it like it was there. I should've asked Tomash to delete the screenshot to mitigate the damage done to July's privacy, but I didn't. I admit I made a mistake there, and one I hope not to make again.
That said, I don't believe what happened here was a witch hunt. A few people got overzealous (names don't occur to me) but emotions were running high and not everyone can keep their head when things get that way.
What I was asking for was contact information so that I could privately speak with July, and ask to see if she would consent to that screenshot being posted. This was to be done with private information redacted, in the event that the community as a whole discussed exactly what bullying constituted, given that "harassment" can be difficult to define. -
Yeah, no. by
on 2017-03-17 23:40:00 UTC
Link to this
My first response to Ix's post was "Something looks way off about this, I'm staying out." And I planned to stay all the way out - I'm so, so very tired of drama.
But there are significant parts of that log that specifically call for punishment of July. In fact, judging from this:
Alleb-Yesterday at 11:44 AM
This dialogue feels... unproductive. We've basically just been saying "this is bad, we need to change." So are we going to? What steps do we need to take to make sure there isn't another situation like this? What are we going to do? We're writers; our business is words. Right now, though, we need action.
Khryssty-Yesterday at 11:44 AM
Thank you.
Delta Juliette-Yesterday at 11:44 AM
Aye. I should be working.
Granz-Yesterday at 11:44 AM
And who do we take action against?
Alleb-Yesterday at 11:45 AM
JF, I think. Glarn is already gone.
Granz-Yesterday at 11:45 AM
So is she, mostly.
Alleb-Yesterday at 11:45 AM
True.
But we also need to lay down plans for future incidents.
Tomash-Yesterday at 11:46 AM
Isn't it mostly "what" do we take action against?
Alleb-Yesterday at 11:46 AM
This should be a catalyst for us.
SkarmorySilver-Yesterday at 11:46 AM
I don't know if there's anything we CAN do at this point, for anyone or to anyone.
Khryssty-Yesterday at 11:46 AM
It would be easier to just let the banhammers swing and get JF completely out of the picture before any more damage can be done.
Guys . . . that's almost the definition of a witch-hunt. "This person is upset/something is wrong. We need to punish someone. Let's ban this person who we judge to be to blame." Tomash points out that the dialogue should be taking action against an action, not a person. But that bit there? Let's punish someone for this grievance? That's a witch-hunt. (Ironically, considering the last accusation of bullying, it's also very Foucaultian.) To say something cannot be called a witch-hunt because of "the heat of the moment" and "emotions were running high" is to ignore the nature of a witch hunt. . . which is, again, finding a scapegoat for a perceived problem, using emotional mob mentality. I also see nasty things being thrown at Huinesoron. Not as much at Neshomeh. I see Desdendelle, here, telling Iximaz that withdrawing from a medication, specifically one targeting the nervous system, is no excuse for lashing out. I'm guessing he's never had to deal with withdrawal from an anti-psychotic. My point is, however, that "emotions ran high" is no excuse for grabbing the torches and pitchforks to run someone out of a community.
I can't even address the doxxing. We've all played fast and loose with our own privacy over the years, when among people we trust with our identity. I have no words for how I feel seeing it rebound against someone. -
I agree with this. by
on 2017-03-17 23:46:00 UTC
Link to this
That's why my stance during the discussion had been to leave July out of the overall discussion. I was worried about the implications of "let's do something to make sure incidents like this don't happen again" and "let's go after July!" being talked about in the same breaths.
-
All the logs by
on 2017-03-17 20:38:00 UTC
Link to this
Here's 84 pages of discussion, minus one screenshot.
Please keep in mind that during most of the beginning of that log, the people talking were unsure whether Iximaz was alive and therefore under a lot of emotional stress. -
All right, I've read this now. by
on 2017-03-18 16:57:00 UTC
Link to this
Some observations and thoughts:
1. You lot decided to have one of Iximaz's posts deleted from the Board without her say-so and without bothering to tell her? I understand that the idea came from Aegis, who you understandably trusted to know Ix's mind, but still, that was not smart, and clearly added to the problem. I feel that should be openly acknowledged.
2. You're taking one person's feelings as hard evidence that the community is broken and everyone in it is a failure of a human being. That's really messed up. However much we like Iximaz and however serious her troubles are, she is just one person. Do not base your self-worth and your judgement of this group on one person's feelings. It's not fair to anyone, especially not Iximaz. How on Earth do you think it makes her feel to have the community fall apart because of something she said while undergoing a bad drug withdrawal? That's an incredible amount of pressure to put on her, and it's not fair.
I know you all care about Iximaz and want to help her, but please see my reply to Aegis here about the necessity for Iximaz to be responsible for herself in order to be an empowered, well-functioning adult. We can be as supportive and attentive as you please, but if she doesn't tell us something is wrong, we are not to blame for not knowing. If she's not doing the work she needs to do to move past her trauma, nothing we can do will fix it. Do not take away her power by denying that.
3. Feelings are not facts. I just want to state that flat-out. Feelings are not facts, especially when you all are well aware that the person having those feelings is not of sound mind at the time. See above comment on the unfair amount of pressure that puts on Iximaz, who has enough to worry about without all of you going on a crusade if she says boo when she's high or detoxing. Taking her seriously does not mean unconditionally believing that everything she says is an accurate representation of reality.
3.5. I'll add here that I'm not comfortable with the nightly sessions of hanging out with her in voice chat when she's taken her meds and ought to be trying to sleep. I was there for it a couple times, and I get it—I experienced a sense of bonding and freeing from inhibitions, which I enjoyed even as I felt kind of icky about it. However, I'll note that I also urged Iximaz to go to bed. Nobody can make her do that—I repeat that Iximaz is responsible for making her own choices—but might I suggest that we no longer enable her fighting her medication by participating in those sessions, should she return to Discord? We all need to be more responsible toward her, and this is one concrete way to start.
4. I suppose I should address what was said, or rather implied, about me. Yes, I advised Iximaz not to throw away what had been a very close friendship with July over one stupid misunderstanding. I think dropping July was an overreaction based on past trauma that was not relevant to the situation, and I stand by that. I will not support allowing trauma to run anyone's life unchecked, forever.
I also think that, if you can understand and forgive Iximaz's issues, you should also be capable of understanding and forgiving July's. She was not just "tired"; she had worked a grueling 22-hour military shift, and I daresay she was in fact triggered by something that felt, to her, similar to a past trauma she went through with the IRC. In keeping with not letting trauma run our lives, however, she realized she had done wrong, regretted it, and repented. Maybe Iximaz had legitimate reasons for being unable to process that at the time, but none of the rest of you do now.
5. The witch-hunt was, in fact, a witch hunt. Someone said "we should DO something!", someone else said "yeah! who are we gonna punish?", and y'all decided it was July you wanted to burn to set a precedent for the future. Yes, there was talk about getting her side, but it's pretty clear that at least some of you had already made up your minds. Des was the only person who spoke up to defend her, and you disregarded him.
6. There's been some sentiment floated about how the oldbies defend July because it's the status quo or something? And how we give her a pass because she's seen as an authority? That's such BS. I can't speak for anyone else because we are not a hive mind, but for myself, I defend July because I know her, I trust her, and she's been a good friend to me. As such, I also call her on her behavior when I think it's wrong. You don't always see it because I communicate with her privately, especially since she's not on the Board as much these days (and who can blame her when half the community is just waiting for any excuse to string her up?), but if you want to go and look at the thread surrounding Ix's falling out with her again, I believe you will see me doing just that. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
I'm sure there's more I wanted to say, but I haven't had breakfast yet. Maybe more will come to me later. I think those are the most important points I wanted to hit, anyway.
All in all, the main problem I see here is that enough of you have wound yourselves so tightly around Iximaz with your concern for her feelings that you've given her the power to destabilize the whole community. This is dysfunctional and absurd. Please unwind yourselves so that she can have a more normal relationship with the group and so that we can all return to being individuals with our own normal, non-Iximaz-related agendas.
~Neshomeh -
Replies by
on 2017-03-19 07:28:00 UTC
Link to this
1) Sweet Ghezen, was that a mistake. We decided to delete some of the posts she made in chat too and I was the mod who carried that out. That's not the right way to deal with someone saying things they might regret later. I did a bad job as moderator and will do better in the future.
Applicable to misc. other numbers) I have been overconfident in my understanding of PPC dynamics. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing -- I used I knew the important parts of what was going on, and have realized I do not. I will be more humble in the future.
--Key -
Replies by
on 2017-03-18 20:24:00 UTC
Link to this
1) That was a mistake. I trusted Aegis. His reasons (he wanted to mitigate the damage when Ix's withdrawal ended (he thought it'd be the next morning)) sounded good at the time. It turned out that the deletions were the wrong thing to do, and I regret my panicked involvement.
2) When I initially heard the complaints several days before they were raised on the Board, I felt they couldn't be entirely accurate, but I trusted Iximaz enough to try and look in to them. My actions while doing so (see my reply to hS elsewhere) probably made things worse. I realize now that she had never spoken out about the things she was complaining of, publicly or otherwise. It took me a long time and several missteps to realize that I was hearing an extremely skewed interpretation of events and that no one else know anything about how Iximaz felt. I had a gut feeling something was off about what I was hearing, but I didn't want to dismiss it because of my frinedship. I'm sorry for all the trouble I caused with my half-hearted investigations and crusades.
I didn't really understand what had happened to Iximaz and what I (and she) needed to do that would be actually helpful.
3) I tried to not unconditionally believe what I was hearing without completely ignoring it. I didn't realize what was going on, especially since I didn't know about the mood swings caused by the new meds until after I'd heard Ix's thoughts on the community.
3.5) Good point.
4) Nesh, I completely understand your actions, and I think they were the right thing to do given the circumstances I am now more aware of. I thought ill of you without all the facts, and I shouldn't have done that.
5) There was a witchhunt. I'm ashamed that I threw fuel onto the fire by posting what I did. I hope that the remainder of the record shows that I didn't want to blame or punish July for that sort of thing, but I worry I was not clear about this at the time.
In general, Neshomeh, your comments on this situation and how it has been handled have been extremely helpful to me. I realized that I made a lot of mistakes in how I reacted to what Iximaz was doing and saying, and I believe I have learned from what you and others have been saying on the board so that I will be less unintentionally damaging in the future.
I admit I may have, as you said, wound myself too tightly around Iximaz's feelings, and done some very bad things because of it. Can I be forgiven? -
FYI, my above post is a general one. by
on 2017-03-19 02:20:00 UTC
Link to this
Just in case anyone thought it was aimed at Tomash alone.
But anyway, Tomash, thank you for your responses. I do forgive you. I know things are really messed up and confusing, and I do believe you were trying to do the right thing by your friends. Plus everything I said in my reply to Mattman up there.
I'm very happy to hear that you've found my posts helpful. I regret that I haven't said some of these things earlier, in fact, but this crystallized a lot of them for me, so I hope it's not too late and that we can all learn from this.
~Neshomeh -
Oh, it goes beyond that. by
on 2017-03-17 20:30:00 UTC
Link to this
Hi guys! I've seen your chat logs now.
Who wants to help me count the ways this is a horrifying post? Let's start!
1/ Tomash posted a private conversation between two people who were not him, without permission from either of them.
2/ Tomash posted about me, discussing my actions in a place where I have made it very clear I will not go. Talking about people behind their backs is explicitly called out in the PPC Constitution.
3/ Tomash misstated, if not flat-out lied about, my reaction. Here's the entire conversation concerning that picture; I received a reply from Iximaz which I have not shown, but never an answer from Tomash.
4/ Tomash chose to post July's full name and face in a public place, where there is a permanent record, without her knowledge or consent.
I'm looking desperately for anyone objecting to this. I've found one "I'm not sure about posting the image", one "you should probably censor July's name and face" (note: future tense, not past"... and one "If July really has been verbally abusive, why protect her?"
Tell me how this is acceptable behaviour. Tell me why it's okay for a moderator to publically post someone's real identity in the course of resolving an argument. Tell me why you - and I make it at least a dozen of you who were there - are perfectly fine with something that can be linked to July's real name, home, family, job, everything... being publically splashed across the internet in front of people who are busy saying how abusive she is.
Tell me. I'm listening.
hS -
It is not. by
on 2017-03-18 13:52:00 UTC
Link to this
I have no saying on the matter, nor do I have anything that would in any way, shape or form justify Tomash's idea. I will not deny that my personal problems with July led me to be a part of this conversation, however nowhere in the logs you see me saying that her real name and face should be made public.
Two days ago, a certain somebody (to whom I am still thankful) gave me few good arguments as to why narrowing down JulyFlame as the sole source of PPC peer abuse was not the right path to take. Everyone at that time in Discord was concerned for Iximaz, true, but it's evident thattheywe should have focused on the issue as it was whole, not just what one person could have been guilty of. For that approach, I was ready to offer my apologies to JulyFlame (and not because Des said so), however doing so would only worsen the already hanging-on-a-thread relationship we have, as it was evident by my IWD post. Therefore, even if I regret voicing my opinion at the time, I can't bring myself to apologise to JulyFlame directly.
However, I would like to address one of the things you mention here, hS.
"I'm looking desperately for anyone objecting to this. I've found one "I'm not sure about posting the image", one "you should probably censor July's name and face" (note: future tense, not past"... and one "If July really has been verbally abusive, why protect her?""
It actually goes a little more than those three (well, two, since the last one isn't really an objection) sentences. You can see the logs below in my reply to Des's ridiculousness, but just to bring them out once again what I managed to find:
"Actually, in a way it is part of exactly the can of worms we're about to open. But I agree with not putting the convo on board."
"You should probably censor July's name and face."
"If July wanted her real name known on the board, she would go by it."
"We could quote the conversation.
Instead of using the screenshot."
"I agree that showing face and real name is not cool and disrespectful. (...)"
"And IMHO, putting that chat screencap in public view would be extremely disrespectful to all parties involved, which won't help anybody's case."
As you can see, the objection was there. Not everyone present in the conversation was perfectly okay with doing this. -
Yes, I read that portion later. by
on 2017-03-18 14:34:00 UTC
Link to this
There were several objections to posting the image on the Board.
Absolutely no-one took Tomash to task for posting it in the public Discord channel.
I am glad that some people were aware that the image should not be posted on the Board. But that does not make the lack of reaction to it being posted on the Discord okay.
hS -
Definitely dropped the ball. by
on 2017-03-19 05:04:00 UTC
Link to this
While I was taking up the cause of "hey maybe no witch hunts" it somehow completely slipped my mind to put my foot down on the screencap being in the Discord to begin with. Oops.
Sorry. -
Dear gods. by
on 2017-03-18 15:42:00 UTC
Link to this
I doubt I can speak for anyone else, but I personally had no idea that the Discord channel was as public as the Board - the invite-based nature led me to think that only those who were invited to the channel at all would see it. I should've known that this could potentially include everyone who's ever been on the channel should they hop in and scroll up to when the conversation was happening.
As I noted yesterday, I did speak to Aegis about not posting the screencap on the Board, but in hindsight I should've taken offense to it being put up on the Discord in the first place or anywhere that could be seen by anyone online for that matter, even other community members. Again, my deepest apologies go to everyone involved, and I guarantee that I'll be more vigilant regarding these kinds of acts in the future. -
I confess to falling under the same delusion by
on 2017-03-18 18:21:00 UTC
Link to this
Never before have I thought of the Discord channel as something that, under right measures, can be made public to pretty much anyone. Should've known better after that Reddit problem.
I admit to my lack of reaction to that potential danger that could've been inflicted on JulyFlame. No point in trying to defend myself there. To my future judges: Do what you think is right. -
I mean, is this news? by
on 2017-03-18 07:27:00 UTC
Link to this
July's name and face are, if not public then easily accessed but at least a quarter of the board. I just checked, and I still have her name, email address, an old picture, and a bunch of other stuff from ages ago when we were friends. She's never been shy about it.
-
A couple of things. by
on 2017-03-17 22:29:00 UTC
Link to this
First: you are absolutely correct. This isn't acceptable, especially from a moderator. It's illegal, and I really think Tomash should have his mod powers stripped from him because of it.
The conversation, though? That's evidence. Tomash doing something stupid in the heat of the moment does not and should not absolve July of her alleged offence against Iximaz.
I also note I don't see a witch hunt in the logs. I see people asking for July's testimony. That's an informal trial unfolding as it should - trying to get all sides before passing judgement.
You know, it would probably be a good idea to institute a rule not to post while angry and/or extremely tired, just to avoid situations like those July's apparently prone to. Angry posts often give offence that isn't intended, and a rule banning it would protect the more fragile members of the community.
Now, it'd be good to get back to the important conversation of what are we going to do to stop this from happening again. I was wrong before - we can't do anything about July until she's here to defend herself. So let's fix the problem. -
"An informal trial" IS a witch-hunt. by
on 2017-03-17 23:51:00 UTC
Link to this
Literally, that's what witch-hunt means.
And you can't have a trial without the person you're accusing in the room. -
Yes, you can. by
on 2017-03-17 23:55:00 UTC
Link to this
Trials in absentia are definitely a thing.
But, you know, that's why I'm calling for July to be dropped from this discussion until she's actually around. -
I deeply apologize by
on 2017-03-17 21:12:00 UTC
Link to this
Looking back, my actions regarding that screenshot were completely unacceptable. JulyFlame, I apologize for leaking that information about you. It absolutely should not have happened. Iximaz, I apologize for dragging things into the light without consulting you (or July, for that matter). I have removed the screenshot in question from the Discord.
I posted in the interest of allowing the community to be fully aware of the circumstances surrounding Iximaz's departure, so that we could learn from them. I made a huge mistake in the process of doing this, and, again, I apologize. The only possible mitigation for my actions in this matter is that I did not know whether Iximaz was alive when I made that post, and I was angry and scared.
Huinesoron, during that email conversation, I was following up on a version of Iximaz's departure post I had heard a few days earlier, which included accusations of specific groups of people being uncaring. I didn't want to say what I was looking in to for fear of a backlash. During that conversation, it became clear that you didn't know the extend of July's actions at the time or how they had affected Iximaz. When I sent you the image in question, I sought to inform you. I interpreted your final reply as dismissing the validity of Iximaz's perception of events, that is, as claiming that she should not have felt harassed by those events. If this wasn't what you meant to say, I apologize for significantly misinterpreting you.
You have not received an answer from me because I have not had time to compose it in between traveling and dealing with the present situation.
I brought you up in that message because, again, I wanted everyone to know what had happened so that things could be improved. I realize that I was talking behind your back, and I apologize for that. -
Not enough. by
on 2017-03-17 21:25:00 UTC
Link to this
You will delete any copies of that screenshot that you have. That goes for anyone who took a copy from the chat, as well. Delete it.
This ends now.
hS -
I have no more access to any copies of the screenshot by
on 2017-03-18 14:26:00 UTC
Link to this
The reason I'm only posting this now is that I needed Iximaz to delete the copy she sent me from our private message history before I could truthfully say they were all deleted.
-
Good. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 14:40:00 UTC
Link to this
-
No, that's not okay. by
on 2017-03-17 20:37:00 UTC
Link to this
Seriously, guys, this needs to be said? This is basic internet etiquette/common sense/human decency.
Not okay. -
Yes, please. by
on 2017-03-17 17:22:00 UTC
Link to this
July is a human being whom I happen to trust and respect a great deal, despite, I feel it relevant to note, having personally fallen out with her in the past. She's not perfect, but none of us are. We all have our issues, and none of us deserves to be treated as an acceptable target whenever something goes wrong. She has feelings, too, and it is not acceptable to tread on them with impunity.
I can't let this go unsaid: Iximaz is a wonderful person whose presence we value, and they do deserve to be taken seriously. However, we cannot properly do that without also bearing in mind that their mental illness, and sometimes side-effects of the treatment for it, means that they are not always 100% rational. Let us strive not to fall into the trap that turns understanding and accepting into enabling. This is as much for their sake as for ours as a community. It doesn't help anyone to encourage them to persist in destructive behaviors (internally or externally directed), and we can't be bending over backwards and changing the very structure of our community every time something goes wrong with someone's meds. This is a pattern at this point, and I would rather not see it play out again if we can avoid it.
Just to be clear, I don't mean this as a criticism of Iximaz. I state that they have a mental illness not as a slur, merely as a fact. I mean only to encourage a deeper understanding of their issues and more responsible behavior toward them on the community's part.
~Neshomeh -
Hmm. by
on 2017-03-17 22:02:00 UTC
Link to this
I agree with most of what everyone's said, and I suppose I'm replying to this not to attack anyone's argument but to mull over some mixed feelings on the matter. I disagree that July isn't a bully, I've seen and experienced her acting downright viciously to people with little or no justification and expecting everyone to act like it's fine. There've been problems like this for years. She kicks people around with impunity and it somehow gets treated as bad when people shoot back.
That said, all of those actions have been ages ago, I've not seen July around in ages nor do I know if any of that still applies. I also know nothing of the incident Ix cited to speak as to what happened, since I wasn't present, but here's the important thing:
None of what I just said justifies doxxing somebody. The moment we look for "justified" targets for leaking names, faces, personal conversations etc., where does it end? Anyone can justify anything if they try hard enough and whatever feelings I have about the people involved, that's unacceptable, especially when somebody isn't around to speak in their own defence. That should really be as clear as day. Whatever we think about whomever, whatever the discussion being had, we should still be bound by common decency.
Posting the screenshot at all was unacceptable, that should be the end of it. Now, as far as witch hunts, I again have mixed feelings. I feel the accusations of a witch hunt, beyond what Tomash posted, don't really have much basis in fact, but as I said repeatedly in the chatlog, there seemed to be a lot of emphasis on punishing July where I honestly felt it was irrelevant to the more important discussion at hand. If we're talking about improving community standards and whatnot, that seems like a discussion that should be had without inextricably tying it with one specific spat between two PPCers. Aegis wanted to just talk to July privately, much like I was given the opportunity to speak on the matter of Brink in the chatlog, and that's fine. Overall, however, I feel it's more constructive to discuss next steps and where we go from here than going after someone who isn't really even still around. -
This went downhill quickly by
on 2017-03-17 10:29:00 UTC
Link to this
This went downhill very quickly. That is all
-
I would just like to point out one thing for now. by
on 2017-03-17 01:08:00 UTC
Link to this
I've been sans-Internet the last couple of days due to moving to a new apartment, I'm tired, and I'm sick of crap like this, so I'm not going to say much right here.
However, I think it is important to note that neither July, nor Ekyl, nor GlarnBoudin have been particularly active, nor—as far as I'm aware—so much as spoken to Iximaz since the incidents she mentioned as driving her to self-harm, quitting, etc. I have strong feelings about things like this due to Tray-Gnome's attempts to turn the community on me by claiming I was making them feel unsafe just by existing, despite also not having spoken to them since one single incident where we had an Issue (which I had apologized for and taken a leave of absence after, incidentally). I don't think this paints a picture of people who are bullies.
More when I'm more sane, please don't burn down the Board while I'm otherwise occupied, thanks.
~Neshomeh -
The most basic change by
on 2017-03-16 22:17:00 UTC
Link to this
We need to be less reluctant to punish wrongdoers. I know I always want to think the best of everyone, and I think that the community in general gives too much benefit of the doubt, even when it isn't deserved. We need to act more quickly -- don't get me wrong, we need to treat people as innocent until proven guilty, but we need to act immediately once we get proof. I agree with what was said below: our ban votes are too long.
First step to take: we Discord mods need to be quicker to kick. I know no one likes punishing people we know, but this needs to happen, and kicks are pretty temporary.
However, we should stop having a freely available, eternal Discord invite on the wiki. This would require us to invite each newbie and returnbie separately, but would mean that kicked members would have to PM a mod to get back in, allowing the mods to impose cool-down periods/bans. These would not be unilateral actions by one mod: if one person was being unreasonable, the person being unfairly banned could contact a different mod and get back in.
--Key has lots of thoughts, this is just a start -
A few things. by
on 2017-03-17 17:36:00 UTC
Link to this
First of all, getting rid of the permanent invite is jumping at shadows. At no point did we have a problem with someone abusing it to return to the channel after being kicked. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Second, are you ready to accept responsibility for kicking someone unjustly? Are you ready to face the consequences of that, whatever they may be?
Third, I don't get how we (or rather, you guys who were around for that) could've stopped what happened two days ago. If you could go back in time, you'd go and kick Ix from the channel at the middle of her shouting? Would that solve anything? -
Probably not (Please disregard what I said above) by
on 2017-03-19 06:10:00 UTC
Link to this
I've been reading what's been going on since I last posted, and everything I said was pure idiocy. I am not qualified to make suggestions here. Please disregard what I said above; I no longer think it's a good idea.
-- Key -
I agree completely with this. by
on 2017-03-17 00:47:00 UTC
Link to this
I particularly agree with the bit about the eternal invite. It did strike me that certain members could have just gone to the wiki page and thrown themselves back over and over again, and if there's account-banning, then they'd just make new accounts in order to harass people.
-
I would consider going a bit further by
on 2017-03-16 23:47:00 UTC
Link to this
I would consider getting rid of the Discord Chat altogether. I think just about every recent issue over the past two-three months have all started there. I think it might be something about the lack of time to consider before posting. On the board it does take longer, and that might be a fix. It gives a chance for cooler heads to prevail.
-
I think this argument is fallacious. by
on 2017-03-17 00:22:00 UTC
Link to this
The Discord, in this case, is kinda like plumbing — you only notice it when it starts acting up. Another metaphor is police: police mistakes/judgement errors tend to get blown out of proportion because nobody notices the good police does.
The point is this: your argument discounts all of the good stuff that goes over in the Discord in order to focus on its bad side, and further, Drama does happen even with no chat channel being around; we didn't have any Discord when the Data issue blew up, or when the whole mess with Brink and Ekyl happened. -
It's also the same thing that happened with the IRC by
on 2017-03-17 02:24:00 UTC
Link to this
Any time something bad happened in IRC, you had calls to dispense with it entirely. Wouldn't have fixed the problem then, won't now.
-
I think we should start by taking Iximaz seriously. by
on 2017-03-16 21:46:00 UTC
Link to this
Assuming what she said about us as a community is true, we should educate ourselves on ways to a) know when we're bullying someone, b) know when we're being an apologist, and c) stop both of those. Seafarer's suggestion of handling JulyFlame before anything else also has a certain amount of sense to it.
I wish I had a more substantial answer, but I'm not as involved in the community as some of you. I do care about the mental health of everyone in it, which is why Iximaz's post troubles me. -
No. Just... no. by
on 2017-03-17 00:28:00 UTC
Link to this
Let's not assume that a) those people are bullies (because that merits looking into and "guilty until proven otherwise" is a bad principle to go on) and b) that we've somehow failed in stopping them (because that depends on them actually being bullies).
-
Seconded! --Key is using a study hall to read up on bullying (nm by
on 2017-03-16 21:47:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I have some thoughts. by
on 2017-03-16 20:52:00 UTC
Link to this
Firstly: we need some kind of moderator.
If someone's being bullied, how can they get help? What can they do? Every method of bringing the community's attention to this kind of thing involves posting something publicly - where the bully can see it. There's no safe, private communication that a victim can use to get help.
I would suggest a few trusted members of the community become that safe space. If someone feels victimised, they can contact one of those people directly. That way, the burden is off the victim - the mod (or whatever title you give them) can review and collect evidence (through forwarded emails, or being given access to the Google Doc, or whatever), and then they can be the one to present it to the community at large.
I'm also not really convinced that the entire community really needs a vote. We need clear guidelines about what punishment goes with what offence, and if we make those clear enough, a simple look at the evidence should be enough for the mod(s) to declare the punishment. Certainly, the evidence should be posted on the Board for all to review, and there may be some debate as to what level applies, but the final decision should be delegated to avoid the lengthy, time-wasting votes that we usually have.
But that isn't the thing that should happen first.
The community has been failing its members. Ix is the third person I've seen name JulyFlame as the perpetrator of bullying. July has driven at least three people from the community with her(?) behaviour. The first thing to do is decide what to do about her. -
I like your ideas about the moderators by
on 2017-03-16 21:46:00 UTC
Link to this
It makes sense to me to take the burden of collecting evidence off the victim, and it seems like a natural direction for Discord at least -- we already have a mod channel where we log warnings given (mostly for language, etc.). It will also lend credibility to the victim: having accusations presented by a neutral third party would reduce the temptation to excuse the perpetrator's behavior.
In Discord, private messaging is simple, and I'm in favor of mods providing their emails (mine's clickable on this post).
I also propose that moderators be made to run for re-election fairly regularly, so that they have to do a good job if they want to keep the position. We'd need an impeachment process, too.
Having mod powers contingent upon re-election would also make me feel better about the idea of having the mods decide on bans -- which would definitely streamline a process which could use some streamlining.
. . .what this adds up to seems to be changing the PPC from a direct democracy to a representative democracy. I. . . I think I'm okay with that idea.
--Key -
I don't think it's a good idea. by
on 2017-03-16 21:59:00 UTC
Link to this
What you get, then, is moderators who are where they are because they're popular and good at getting voted for, moreso than the most qualified.
-
That is one potential outcome. by
on 2017-03-17 00:58:00 UTC
Link to this
However, as it stands now, who would we choose? The PGs? Ignoring current events and questions, I'm pretty sure they're not chosen because of their finely-tuned moral compasses. They're chosen because they can look at somebody's work and determine, well, whether or not said person is ready to write for the PPC. Unfortunately, however, they're basically the highest authority figure we have around right now, so if we wanted to make the position equivalent with previously existing structures, that is who would get the job.
Also, there is the question of qualifications. What makes somebody good for the job? How do they prove they fulfill those requirements? And, of course, what do we do when somebody looks to meet them, but falls short in practice? As I believe you mentioned an impeachment process in Discord and it might as well be brought here, what on your thoughts on how that would work? -
This is still being discussed. by
on 2017-03-17 03:02:00 UTC
Link to this
Frankly there are more questions than answers at this point, but here's a few thoughts from how the Discord seemed to be leaning:
* Impeachment would be carried out by community vote. A member of the community with a grievance would state their grievance in a board post and present their evidence, and there would be a voting and discussion period opened to the community (1-2 weeks?) where it is determined whether or not the grievance merits removal, or possibly some other sanction.
* Moderators would be either newly selected, or empowered PGs.
* Moderators would not get a vote in impeachment proceedings, for reasons relating to potential conflicts of interest.
* I jokingly suggested we dispense with the idea of democracy and just appoint hS king of the PPC, but I don't think anyone would like that.
As for your other questions, I'll have to come back to this. The traits and skills that make a good moderator are obvious. The process to select and prove them, not so much. -
I second the above post wholeheartedly. (nm) by
on 2017-03-16 21:58:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Does yourwebapps allow for that? by
on 2017-03-16 21:02:00 UTC
Link to this
If not, this might be a case of the current board not being ideal for our needs.
-
I was thinking... by
on 2017-03-16 21:12:00 UTC
Link to this
Have the mods always put their email addresses in their title lines. I don't think YWA has proper private messaging, so I had to think of a workaround.
-
I'd like to know... by
on 2017-03-16 20:55:00 UTC
Link to this
Who are those other two people who named July a bully, and who are the people who got driven out of the PPC because of her.
-
Don't know all the names. by
on 2017-03-16 21:11:00 UTC
Link to this
Data Junkie mentioned July's bullying, though. So did the troll. The part about people being driven out was my interpretation of something that came up a while ago, though I believe Tray-Gnome's name was brought up specifically. I can go digging, if you like.
-
Dude, your sources are bad. by
on 2017-03-16 21:21:00 UTC
Link to this
They are, in order, a) a person who nearly got banned for abusive behaviour and then threw themselves out of the Board after seeing that their bad behaviour isn't welcome, b) a troll and c) a person who left the PPC after abusing hS and Nesh, returned to poke at sensitive things and throw names around, and left afterwards.
I'm inclined to think that this sorta accusation is baseless. Bad blood existing between people (like Ix and July, me and LilySinful AKA Tray-Gnome, etc) doesn't necessarily mean that it's immediately bullying. -
Come now we both know that's not why she left by
on 2017-03-18 07:50:00 UTC
Link to this
She left because this community clearly supports bullies and bigots, but will deny it to the death. And it will eventually be the death of the community with Crow's blessing, as she would say.
-
This IP address matches both Data Junkie and Orwell. by
on 2017-03-18 08:00:00 UTC
Link to this
There are approximately four matches to Orwell, aka Toroll. There are many matches to Data Junkie.
Orwell is a banned user. So far as I recall, Data Junkie has not been banned, but has stated that they were leaving.
It is up to the community to decide whether Data Junkie and Toroll aka Orwell are identical. If they are, Data Junkie should be considered a banned user and their posts deleted on sight.
A screenshot of the search results will be posted on request. -
Exactly how concrete is this? by
on 2017-03-21 07:15:00 UTC
Link to this
Just asking as someone who doesn't really understand the concept/function behind IP addresses. Do these matches guarantee that Orwell is Data, or is it potentially just coincidence based on their geographic locations?
—doctorlit prepares himself for disappointing answer -
All it proves... by
on 2017-03-21 07:53:00 UTC
Link to this
..is that they live close enough together to have used the same IP address at some point. It's not a Tor node, but I believe Orwell let slip that they were using a coffee shop's internet in one of their recent posts.
So, yeah. Suspect, but not conclusive. -
Not quite. by
on 2017-03-21 08:03:00 UTC
Link to this
An IP links to a specific computer. It can change, that's certainly possible, but... 170-odd of Data Junkie's 217 posts came from that address. Only 4 of 17 of Orwell's did. But one Data Junkie post came after the Orwell posts. It seems unlikely that a) the IP would switch and then switch back, and b) it would do so right when Data Junkie left, then jump back just in time for them to make one more post.
It is conceivable that Data Junkie posted from a single non-home location 9/10ths of the time, and that Orwell-aka-Toroll - a troll who has talked an awful lot about Data Junkie, and made similar attacks on the community to them - happens to live nearby and use the same location, but being a very etiquette-conscious flamer troll, hasn't ever mentioned this.
But it seems unlikely. Occam's razor says that the troll who derailed Data Junkie's ban is probably Data Junkie, and that as Orwell they normally posted elsewhere or through Tor.
hS -
Pedantic correction. by
on 2017-03-21 20:17:00 UTC
Link to this
IP addresses are owned by ISPs, and are therefore usually connected to routers*, not cleint-end computers. The rest of your conclusions, however, I have no problem with; Data Junkie wasn't exactly healthy for the community, so I have no issues with blocking him on conjecture now.
*My understanding is that each customer of an ISP is given a number of IP addresses for their use, so any computer connecting to that customer's router will be given one of those IP addresses. If there are enough different people using that router, the IP addresses will start being reused for new unique users. -
Mini-infodump incoming by
on 2017-03-22 04:27:00 UTC
Link to this
This is probably one of the more relevant times y'all could be talking about this, given that I've got an ethical hacking midterm tomorrow, and IP address stuff is important for that.
So, IP addresses. The general point is that computers need a way to refer to other computers located on a network. A name is nice for humans but rather useless for network people, because there's basically no correlation between how similar two names are and how to get to them. So, everyone on the public Internet gets a number to identify them so they can talk and be talked to called an IP address. Every computer keeps some notion of how to reach any other IP address (your machine knows that it can get to anywhere from your router, your router knows that either your ISP can do it or you're looking for another device on the network, and your ISP has a big routing table of IP address ranges and who it has to go through to reach them)
There's two versions of the Internet Protocol (IP), and I'll discuss IPv4 first. With IPv4, your number is 32 bits long, and usually written aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd, where the individual fields are 8 bits long (because four numbers between 0 and 255 are easier to remember than one really big number.
When folks were first designing the Internet, they sure weren't expecting there to be 2^32 (minus a bit) computers on it. Problems were beginning to arise a while back, so a "solution" was devised. Your ISP only gives you one IPv4 address. "But, Tomash!" you object, "I have a computer and a phone and a smart microwave all on the same connection." This is where the nasty evil hack comes in. Your router only gives you a private IP address, usually of the form 192.168.X.Y. When your computer sends out data labeled "From: 192.168.1.5, port [high number], To: 45.56.119.192, port 80" (that'll hit the Board's server), your router secretly rewrites that to say "From: [your public IP address], port [other high number], To: 45.56.119.192, port 80". Then, when the Board sends back its reply labeled "From: 45.56.119.192, port 80, To: [your public IP address], port [other high number]", your router remembers that [other high number] corresponds to [high number] on 192.168.1.5 (that'd be your computer), and so it re-writes the packet back so your computer never notices the deception. This has the drawback (and, if you're a person who writes terrible insecure code I'm looking at you device manufacturers, feature) that your computer can't have a conversation initiated with it, which is a bit annoying for, among other things, multiplayer games and voice calling. For practical purposes, this means that sharing an IPv4 address with someone means you're in the same house or coffeeshop (unless you count, say, all the mobile phones in Qatar, which all share an IP)
Mostly, people didn't mind this packet re-writing business, even though it causes annoying problems. But the Internet kept growing. Several other things were done to save on IPv4 addresses (a big one is that, when you connect to a website, you have to tell the website its own name, so that the same server/IP can serve multiple domain names). However, we're still running out of IPv4 addresses, and in fact, we're more or less out at this point.
Because 32 bits wasn't enough, we moved to 128 bits. Sort of. An IPv6 address, unless it's abbreviated, is aaaa:bbbb:cccc:dddd:eeee:ffff:gggg:hhhh, where each of the alphabet groups is written in base 16. This is more than enough addresses, we swear. This is even expected to be true once it gets mentioned that, right now, you don't get one IPv6 address from your ISP, you get 2^64 of them! (like, you, personally, if your ISP is with the program, can hand out an IPv4 Internet's worth of IPv4 Internets). There's a nice fiddly mechanism for how the eeee through hhhh bits get determined, but suffice to say, if it has an IPv6 address, it's directly on the Internet again. No more connection rewriting. Yay!
For practical purposes, two IPv6 address are in the same house/coffeeshop/... if the first four groups of numbers (and A through F are numbers, whoever told you otherwise?) match. -
Okay, sure. #IAmNotANetworkEngineer. (nm) by
on 2017-03-21 20:21:00 UTC
Link to this
-
*client (nm) by
on 2017-03-21 20:18:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I believe the phrase is "I told you so". (nm) by
on 2017-03-21 08:59:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Tone? by
on 2017-03-21 15:59:00 UTC
Link to this
Are you saying you told me so, paraphrasing my post as 'I told you so', or saying 'I told you (all) so, and hS agrees with me'?
Tone and the internet don't mix, so it seems best to check. ^_^
hS -
The latter. I told people so; dunno if I told you. by
on 2017-03-21 16:46:00 UTC
Link to this
I was on the record at the time as thinking the timing of the appearance of Orwell (we were discussing Data Junkie's ban) was, if you'll forgive the WWII-era phrasing, "too velvety-arsed and Rolls-Royce for me". It was too neat, too much of a coincidence. I was written off as being paranoid. Hell, I wrote myself off as being paranoid. That I was right? Well... not gonna lie, I feel vindicated.
I didn't mean it as a slight on anyone, and if anyone took it that way I can only apologise. -
Requesting the search results just for the record's sake. by
on 2017-03-18 08:13:00 UTC
Link to this
I believe you, but might as well have it out there.
-
Record is attached. by
on 2017-03-18 09:07:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Alright, I'll give you that. by
on 2017-03-16 21:24:00 UTC
Link to this
Let me just check the archives, though. And I'm still concerned about July apparently forcing Ix away last time.
-
Saving you some time: by
on 2017-03-16 21:28:00 UTC
Link to this
The context.
Iximaz's leaving thread.
Iximaz saying she's not leaving because of July.
I think that's the relevant stuff.
hS -
Cheers. by
on 2017-03-16 21:45:00 UTC
Link to this
Yeah, it looks like my memory's not as good as I thought. A lot of people seem to have felt victimised by July, but as I've never seen them post, I can't speak to their character, so I'm dropping that.
Oh, and Ix did leave because of July, in case you missed that. I seem to remember that it was just July blowing up prematurely rather than actively bullying, though, so that's fine.
I think we should talk about the other part of my post now. *apologetic* -
No, I did not miss that. by
on 2017-03-16 21:56:00 UTC
Link to this
The post I linked to was the one she referenced in saying 'I just said I didn't'.
hS -
It's been spoken of, but way back, and often off-board. (nm) by
on 2017-03-16 21:49:00 UTC
Link to this
-
You're citing a troll as supporting your position? (nm) by
on 2017-03-16 21:15:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Circumstantial evidence. by
on 2017-03-16 21:57:00 UTC
Link to this
I didn't take them seriously until Ix's post. Sometimes people with legitimate grievances turn to trolling to get their message across - Iximaz saying similar things made me think they might have had a point. Just so you know why I bothered bringing them up (and I'm sorry now that I did).
-
Possible addition to the Constitution by
on 2017-03-16 19:12:00 UTC
Link to this
Some of the articles of the Constitution (specifically 1 and 10.5) say that bullying will not be tolerated. That's all they say. I mean, 10.5 does say that persistent rule-breakers will be asked to leave the community, but that's not enough. Nowhere in the Constitution is a procedure given for exactly what to do.
What I'm trying to say is that we need an addition to the Constitution detailing exactly what we should do if a situation like this comes up again. For instance: we could add that we won't just let a situation subside; a rule that says we continue discussing about said situation until a decision is reached, no matter how long that takes. Something like that.
Final point: we desperately need an article that somehow, someway, keeps us from being complacent about things and just letting them slide after some time. -
I tentatively agree. by
on 2017-03-16 19:19:00 UTC
Link to this
Tentatively because, frankly, an article isn't going to actually make people do anything. We can't just write some text saying "do this" on the Constitution, we have to convince people to actually act on it.
-
I was suggesting this as a first step. by
on 2017-03-16 19:29:00 UTC
Link to this
Of course, the PPC's entire mentality towards bullies needs to change. But we have to start somewhere. Baby steps.
-
Of course. by
on 2017-03-16 19:51:00 UTC
Link to this
Since we're in the discussion phase, though, I thought it important to note down that step we'll have to take.
-
Posting new message by
on 2017-03-17 23:38:00 UTC
Link to this
Listen, this has gotten out of hand and the blame game has started to take off. No one needs to be banned just be being part of the discussion, no one needs to be hunted, no one needs to take authority on what to do. We all need to cool down. Every single one of us. Wait a few days, or even a week.
That is all I ask. -
Additional request & general disappointment by
on 2017-03-18 00:53:00 UTC
Link to this
Ok, so. I know I have no power over any of you but I would like to respectfully request that July not be mentioned again in this conversation. This conversation was not meant to be about July. It was meant to be about fixing problems, not crusading.
Frankly, I'm ashamed of a lot of you, Tomash and Des especially. While I understand both of your points, the way you handled everything was frankly, unacceptable.
I joined this community for good writing and the humor. There was a lot of that then. Now that I'm back, it's been chaos and if we can't get it together, I don't know how much more of good writing and humor will be left.
I'm considering leaving.
If I do, I won't be looking back. -
Could you clarify? by
on 2017-03-18 01:43:00 UTC
Link to this
Is there anything other than posting that screenshot that you believe I should not have done? I believe that, aside from that massive and completely unacceptable screwup, I've been acting rather reasonably. Have I missed something?
(Email clickable if you want to move the indictment off of the Board) -
Yes, here's something. by
on 2017-03-18 07:46:00 UTC
Link to this
Having heard that Iximaz believed people didn't care, you chose to involve her when you emailed me asking me to self-incriminate. Did you not consider, even briefly, that taking someone who has already told you they want to leave into a conversation where one possible answer was "I know, I don't think it's serious", was a terrible idea? That it could lead directly to Iximaz being harmed by my words?
You had the full story. You brought Iximaz into that situation. And as a result, there's a full paragraph in her leaving post based on a mental-illness-distorted reading of my emails.
You have not acted reasonably. Your decisions have been harmful from the very start.
hS -
I did what I thought was best at the time. I was wrong. by
on 2017-03-18 16:55:00 UTC
Link to this
Clearly, I made mistakes in my handling of this entire situation.
One thing I would like to note is that, when I sent those emails, I did not have the full story. I only had Iximaz's side of the story, since I didn't know what had happened privately during all that. Something felt off about Iximaz's descriptions of how the PGs (including you) were painted in her version, but I took the accusations seriously enough to look in to them by talking to you.
Before talking to you, I asked Iximaz if I could do that, since I would be writing an email going off the details of a private conversation, and I didn't want to betray her trust. I included her on the email because I thought the reply would be something she needed to see. I didn't think through the harm to Iximaz of a reply saying that you didn't think it was serious, and for that, Iximaz, I'm sorry. (For the record, I interpreted your initial reply as indicating that you didn't know the full extent of the situation, and that you didn't think it was serious based on the information you had.)
I also included Iximaz in that conversation on the advice of Aegis, who I trusted to know the right way to handle this situation. Given Nesh's reply to Aegis below, I acknowledge that this trust may not be as fully deserved as I used to think.
Throughout a lot of this, I was taking Iximaz's version of events extremely seriously. It has become clear to me that my actions over the last week have been guided by misinterpretations and misunderstandings, both of Iximaz's state of mind and potential reactions to events and of the actions and intentions of many of my fellow PPCers (including especially Iximaz and you).
Because of my mistakes and failures, I have hurt Iximaz. I certainly didn't want to do that, and, Ix, I hope you can forgive me for whatever part of the blame falls to me. I have also taken actions that have harmed the community as a whole, and JulyFlame specifically. I hope that I can make amends.
I will strive to do better in the future. -
Re: Could you clarify? by
on 2017-03-18 01:57:00 UTC
Link to this
I believe that's what I was referring to. You're right, since then you have conducted yourself well, but yeah. Don't do that please.
-
Won't happen again by
on 2017-03-18 02:02:00 UTC
Link to this
Glad to know there's not anything else I've done wrong
-
Quick question: by
on 2017-03-18 01:21:00 UTC
Link to this
Who here is currently working on a mission?
I feel that the sooner we get back to what our community is all about, the sooner things can return to ordinary non-drama. In this regard, a report would ease my nerves greatly. -
I, uh. I'm working on things. by
on 2017-03-21 23:53:00 UTC
Link to this
Rough estimates:
1 PPC AU
1+ Shipfics
The Purim RP opener and opening post (getting close!)
5ish missions? Not counting ones I haven't touched in a looong time and not counting one recent cowritten one?
At least one interlude, probably? Not counting 1 cowritten one?
The Blackout Interlude. SOMEDAY IT SHALL BE COMPLETED. REALLY.
Some non-PPC stuff.
Yeah. Stuff. Things.
And one great big important interesting essay due on Fridaaaay!
~Zing
PS: Is that enough? Shall I add more? Believe me, I have plans. Someday soon, I hope you'll get to see some of them in action. -
*raises hand* by
on 2017-03-18 18:35:00 UTC
Link to this
A cowrite with Skarmory to a Monster Hunter/Hunger Games crossover, and a solo mission to an MCU fic. Also a pending mission to a Steven Universe fic, which I'll get back to when I have slightly less on my plate.
-
Oh, boy. doctorlit (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 12:19:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Oh, boy. doctorlit's backburner: by
on 2017-03-18 12:29:00 UTC
Link to this
- The interlude taking place immediately after "Pick Your Poison," resolving the conflict there, as well as the never-wrapped-up Poison Joke RP. The second draft is completed, so I just need to heavily go over it one more time to get it ready for betas.
2. Taking place right after that, my contribution to the Blackout event. I haven't even started this.
3. The "Thirty Hs" mission. I have most of this in draft form, although certain scenes in the second half depend on me fleshing out the beginning into a second draft form before I can properly continue.
4. An interlude for my Cafeteria characters, which is also arguably a mission, and is also arguably linked to Phobos's Catastrophe Theory series, even though it takes place in the main timeline.Also names the head Flower of the Cafeteria Division, so no one beat me to that, please.This is also in its second draft form, so one more editing pass from me before beta time.
Unfortunately,
0. Archiving the entire, already existing PPC is always my toppest top priority.
—doctorlit has too much hobby work to do. No wonder he stays so late at his actual job!
- The interlude taking place immediately after "Pick Your Poison," resolving the conflict there, as well as the never-wrapped-up Poison Joke RP. The second draft is completed, so I just need to heavily go over it one more time to get it ready for betas.
-
...You know what? I am working on something, actually. by
on 2017-03-18 11:25:00 UTC
Link to this
I wasn't, not with work, but I feel it's high time to get some writing done. I'm going to try to finally, once and for all, take out My Little Unicorn: Magic is Believing. Or, you know, some smaller badfic if that one proves to be a bit much right now.
-
I'm working on a cowrite with Skarmory. by
on 2017-03-18 08:15:00 UTC
Link to this
Well, I'm doing it when I manage to get enough time to do it, so it's sporadic at best. I'm also thinking abouut my next solo mission, or cowrite, after publishing one at the very end of February.
Oh, and Tomash, there is something I have been thinking about for a while after I got your feedback for this last mission. Could I get your mail to discuss about it? -
I've a few kicking around by
on 2017-03-18 08:06:00 UTC
Link to this
* A Star Wars mission I actually have plotted out to some extent, I just haven't written the bloody thing.
* A co-write that stopped being a thing ages ago I might just take over and finish myself if Cassie OKs it.
* Finally starting that DIA-based spinoff I hinted at with "DIA: Introductions" six and a half years ago(!!!)
* A Firefly mission
* An interlude set in the Pennacook Club
* A different one set in Rudi's
* A Mysterious Project I'm not going to tell any of you about because it's supposed to be a surprise... -
Lots, all of it up to my usual standard. by
on 2017-03-18 05:18:00 UTC
Link to this
((i.e. terrible))
Item: An interlude set during the formation of a whole new support division
Item: Two Doktor Trollenfisch und Gabrielle missions, one of which features never-before-seen minis, one of which is a fairly big deal
Item: Multiple crossovers involving Algie and Lola, though at least one is on the back burner for now.
Item: The planning of the big mission, Wayfinding. It's not big for "Super-Skerreh Legendary" reasons, though it definitely counts as a bleepfic, but for plot. What it concerns I cannot say, but I can tell you it's a crossover between multiple agent teams. -
I've been working on a few things. by
on 2017-03-18 03:11:00 UTC
Link to this
I have an interlude ready for beta reading and one more in the works, and I've been working on a new mission on and off for about three months now, along with collabs with at least two other people. With luck I should be able to have the interludes at the minimum posted this month, but no promises.
Actually, if you want to beta-read the interludes, I can send 'em to you via PM. I only have one beta so far for them and I guess another can't hurt, can it? ;) -
I've had an interlude going off and on again for a bit by
on 2017-03-18 02:43:00 UTC
Link to this
It's a bit about how Agent Peregrin fell into HQ inspired by a writing prompt in the Discord about two months back. It's stalled on account of a combination of writer's block and massive piles of real-life stuff. It might get finished by the end of the year at the rate things are going. Or it might not.
No missions at the moment because I haven't gone looking for a badfic recently, and because I recently decided my self-insert would suck as an agent, so I've re-parntered Peregrin and am still trying to get the hang of the semi-now agent pair.
-
Testing interest. by
on 2017-03-18 10:38:00 UTC
Link to this
Anyone interested in a game of D&D over discord? If i get enkugh players I'll make a discord in a month or so when i'm done with my exams.
-
Re: Testing interest. by
on 2017-03-19 13:07:00 UTC
Link to this
I'd certainly be interested, although my knowledge of D&D is sparse. I'm more used to Black Crusade, though I'm always up for expanding my horizons.
-
I'd probably be interested, depending on the edition. by
on 2017-03-19 06:04:00 UTC
Link to this
'Course it looks like you've got more than enough players already.
-
Possibly interested! by
on 2017-03-19 01:19:00 UTC
Link to this
I haven't played since the 3.5 days, and I didn't play very well then due to being 8 years old and not understanding anything at all. So, if you don't mind sending some resources my way to help me figure it all out, sure!
Even then I won't know what I'll be doing, but that's not the point here -
I think I can get Discord working again. by
on 2017-03-18 18:33:00 UTC
Link to this
What edition?
-
Never really played before, but I'm up for it. (nm) by
on 2017-03-18 17:45:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Sounds like fun by
on 2017-03-18 17:41:00 UTC
Link to this
I'd gladly join in, though I'd need to know the edition before I could figure out what I'm doing.
-
Also interested by
on 2017-03-18 16:57:00 UTC
Link to this
Haven't played any RPGs before, but I'd like to take a swing at it.
-
I'd be interested. by
on 2017-03-18 16:23:00 UTC
Link to this
I've never played D&D, but I wouldn't mind trying given how many other tabletop RPGs I've done.
-
That could be fun. by
on 2017-03-18 15:08:00 UTC
Link to this
I mean, the PPC Discord does have a dedicated chat and voice channel for non-PPC roleplaying, so you could host it there.
I'd also like to know what edition you're thinking of running, because this affects the amount of weirdness I can crowbar into one character. -
Interested. by
on 2017-03-18 12:00:00 UTC
Link to this
I would like to play, but I have a feeling that my schedule will be very limited.
Which edition were you thinking of using?
-
Permission by
on 2017-03-18 19:56:00 UTC
Link to this
So, I've been here on and off for about a month and a half now. More recently, thanks to my stressful job and personal life, I've been off. But, I have really enjoyed being here, and i have decided that I would definitely like to write some PPC of my own. So, I humbly request permission to do so, and include the agent profiles I've written up. If you guys could check over them and see that everything is okay, that'd be much appreciated.
--------------------------
Agent Conrad Harke:
Age - 25
Species - Human
Gender - Male
Home Continuum - Warhammer 40,000
Appearance - Conrad has short jet black hair, pale skin and and blue eyes. His usual outfit consists of black military fatigues, a pair of leather Guard-issue boots, ident-tags and a white undershirt. The patch identifying him as an agent is on the right sleeve of his tunic. Thanks to his universe being originally from the UK, he has a pronounced British accent, though has never been there himself.
Personality - Conrad spent seven years serving in one of the most discipline-heavy armies in the multiverse, and it shows. Anyone above him gets called 'sir' or 'ma'am' whether they like it or not. He spends his free time either binge watching for research, working out in the gym or cleaning his gear. What sense of humour he has left is darker than your average Frankie Boyle routine. When on missions, he tends to be very focused to the point of being taciturn, and off mission, he is usually quite quiet, with any speech kept short and to the point. It takes a lot to get him angry, but when he does, revenge tends to be short but painful/humiliating.
History - Originally hailing from the grimdark universe of Warhammer 40,000, Conrad joined the PPC in 2014 after he fell into a Warp portal during a campaign against Chaos cultists and ended up in HQ. After being talked down from opening fire on several unlucky agents, he was recruited and took to the field eighteen months ago as a Floater. His previous life has served him well in his time at HQ, with his training as an Imperial Guardsman preparing him for working in Word Worlds, and his upbringing as a hiver lets him feel a little more at home in the corridors of HQ than most. While he has mostly adapted to the 21st Century, and understands most of the pop culture he works with, more obscure references and concepts still pose a bit of a problem.
Abilities - Conrad has had military training, and even if it wasn't very good or safe training, he still picked up some useful skills. He can provide basic medical aid if an agent gets injured in the field, has bushcraft knowledge and is skilled with both melee and ranged weapons, although he prefers the latter. He was a qualified sharpshooter in the Imperial Guard, but as he himself is quick to point out, he is no sniper.
Favourites/Lust Objects - Conrad has no lust objects, but he does have a soft spot for the entire crew of Serenity, as well as a great respect for Max Rockatansky.
--
Agent Elly Ruskowski:
Age - 22
Species - Human
Gender - Female
Home Continuum - Real World
Appearance - Elly is Caucasian, with dyed red hair and brown eyes. She usually wears blue jeans, a t-shirt of some description, trainers (sneakers) and a brown leather jacket with her Department of Floaters patch sewn on, along with a single nose stud. She speaks with an American accent, but likes to impersonate others, with varying degrees of success.
Personality - She has a tendency to get very excited when meeting characters she admires, and very angry when they're messed with, especially when her favourite shippings are broken up. This anger is usually worked out on mission with weapon practice or off mission with video games, though outside of missions in her favourite fandoms, she's usually either pretty calm and easygoing, or very hyperactive if something takes her personal interest, and especially if Conrad hasn't seen or read something she thinks is important. She swears a lot, but more as part of her everyday vocabulary than any real anger. In contrast, when she is in a rage, she tends to get much quieter, and use less explicit language.
History - A twenty-two year old from Colorado, Elly had a normal childhood, with good parents and little to worry about except exams, all very middle class. During her high school years, she was a civilian watcher, which lead to her being given the opportunity to join the PPC, a choice she now regrets. She has been working with Conrad in the Department of Floaters for around eighteen months.
Abilities - Elly isn't very good with ranged weapons, and generally prefers using swords and knives on missions where possible. She's a natural speedreader, which lets her pick up details from a Word World quicker than most would. Her encyclopedic knowledge of both pop culture and fandoms also comes in handy. She usually handles the exorcisms and charge lists.
Favourites/Lust Objects - Both of Elly's come from the MCU, and are Black Widow and the Winter Soldier/Bucky, respectively. However, she also has quite a special place in her heart for Ed and Ein of Cowboy Bebop fame.
--
RC #819: Some RC's are old enough to have seen many agents come and go over the unknown amount of time since HQ was set up. Old enough to have acquired quirks, non-standard design features, even personalities in a way. RC #819 is one of these.
It is laid out like a small apartment, with a central hallway leading to the door, and two rooms on each side. On the left as you come in are the two bedrooms, each with room for a bed, desk, shelves and not much more. On the right, there is a tiny bathroom with a shower, sink and toilet, as well as a lounge area. The lounge contains a television and Xbox, a mid-range desktop gaming computer, a well-loved sofa and the console.
As stated previously, #819 is old, and has been lived in by agents almost continuously since the mid 1990's, and more infrequently even earlier in the PPC's history. It shows. The amenities are all mostly modern, but small problems remain. Small unidentifiable scratches and marks are dotted around the RC, some of which look disturbingly like blood. The door has over a dozen names stenciled on it in white paint, and crossed out in red. The console took several bullets around the time of the Fanfic Explosion, and the alarm system is irreparable. Unfortunately, some well-meaning soul patched in an 2003-era iPod, which means that instead of the classic "BEEEEEEEEEP!!!", Conrad and Elly get Dies Irae from Verdi's Requiem blasted at them at one hundred and twenty decibels whenever a mission comes through.
Despite this, it is fairly homely. The lights aren't too bright, the electrical sockets all work, the beds are comfy and it somehow never seems as far to the cafeteria as it does from other places in HQ. What more could a pair of Agents ask for? -
Comments by
on 2017-03-19 15:39:00 UTC
Link to this
First, as Iximaz said, you're missing writing prompts, and a badfic you intend to spork, too. Everything else is here, so if you've got 'em and just forgot to post them, I'll wait before giving a verdict. Otherwise, the writing samples are really the most important thing we need to see, so without them I will have to deny Permission for now.
In the meantime, comments on what you've got:
1) Conrad. I know several people have standing concerns about agents from the 40k universe due to its grimdark nature, and I'd like it of one or two of them weighed in. I don't personally see too much of that in Conrad's profile, but I am concerned about the "short but painful/humiliating revenge" bit. What does that actually mean in practice? Also, to a lesser degree, the dark sense of humor. Lots of agents indulge in a bit of black humor now and then, but given the 40k factor, how dark is dark here?
2) Elly. Mostly looks fine, but she regrets joining the PPC? Seriously, or jokingly? Cuz I'm sure a lot of agents would moan about not knowing what they were getting into when they signed up, but most of them wouldn't quit if you paid them, either. Since they, er, don't get paid, it's really love and/or devotion that keeps most of them going.
3) RC 819. This is where I have the most serious concerns. First of all, if you read enough older spin-offs, you'll note that a standard RC back in the day was no bigger than a college dorm: one room and a closet, maybe a toilet if you're lucky. If this is an older RC, it was built to that design, and there's no way even the most dedicated reconstructionists force that into the two-bedroom apartment shape you describe.
I also object to the two-bedroom apartment RC on principle. I know there's precedent at this point, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. You're not supposed to spend time in your RC; it's just for crashing in during the few scant hours between missions. Also, HQ was originally built by sapient Flowers with little to no understanding of the needs of mammals. It just doesn't work for me, and it never will.
I'm also not a huge fan of non-standard BEEPs, but heck, Dies Irae is cool. Not particularly funny, IMO, but oh well.
I actually like the thought you put into the RC's history, though. That's a welcome bit of added depth that I don't often see.
~Neshomeh, holding her PG hat at the ready. -
Actually. by
on 2017-05-03 21:05:00 UTC
Link to this
I have seen an RC spontaneously turn itself into a 2-bedroom apartment, complete with decorations like bedspreads. At lease I'm pretty sure it was an RC instead of a Tardis.
I saw one RC where they busted through a wall to create a mini response center.
My own agents live in a 2-bedroom RC. -
Re: Comments by
on 2017-03-19 20:04:00 UTC
Link to this
Thanks for the response, and I forgot about the writing samples. Besides, I've decided that I should spend a little more time here before I start properly writing. As to your feedback, which is greatly appreciated:
Conrad:The short but painful/humiliating revenge would be something like pictures of Borat plastered all over your RC's door (That actually happened to someone in my dorm at uni) or your internet search history publicly displayed on noticeboards. Nothing physical, but very embarrassing and painful in a loss of face sort of way, since he's toned it down since becoming an agent. As to humour, think Frankie Boyle or Bill Hicks, but with less swearing.
Elly: The regret is mostly jokingly, though it hides a bit of doubt about if the PPC is a long-term option for her, since she pretty much chose it over higher education. She loves her job, but she can't see herself as an agent in ten years.
RC #819: I get where you're coming from, but I quite like the idea of an RC as a home. You're also right about the old model, so what do you think about it having been converted from a set of storage rooms. It seems like the Flowers would have built a cupboard bigger than an RC. -
Just two things: by
on 2017-03-19 05:18:00 UTC
Link to this
Next time you ask for Permission, please look at this page for what to do... like including prompts, for instance.
The second thing: I barely recognize your name. Be a bit more involved in the PPC, let us get to know you.
If anyone else wants to provide concrit of your agents, I'll let them handle that. I'm too tired to do it properly right now.
-
Proposal: PPC scavenger hunt by
on 2017-03-19 05:10:00 UTC
Link to this
As the title states, I would like to know if other people would be interested in a PPC scavenger hunt. The idea would be that someone (probably me, since I'm proposing this) would come up with a list of things related to the PPC, and that anyone who wants to participate would try to find them. Whoever finds the most things wins.
The things related to the PPC would be items mostly from badfic, although the occasional item from good to mediocre fic would also be on the list. None of them would require going into NSFW or NSFB fic. For example:- A mini with three or more letters added, deleted, or removed
- An object of an impossible color
- A Suvian reformed within their own fic
As for finding the items, that would be accomplished by posting them in a thread made for the scavenger hunt. Two boarders wouldn't be able to use the exact same item, though using a different item from the same fic or even the same chapter would be fine, even for the same thing on the list. Also, legendary badfic (or possibly any fic linked on the PPC wiki?) would be forbidden because it would just be a race to post things on the board at that point.
I'm fully open to any suggestions on this. I just want to know if this looks to be a good idea and if people are interested in participating. -
Sounds interesting by
on 2017-03-19 16:11:00 UTC
Link to this
Count me in!
-
Re: Proposal: PPC scavenger hunt by
on 2017-03-19 12:34:00 UTC
Link to this
I'd definitely be up for this. We'd have to figure out a few rules, decide which sites are off limits (There's a few sites out there which while they would have most of the things on any given list, need brain bleach to enter, read and exit), set a start and end date and come up with some really interesting items for the list.
-
Making NSFW/NSFB fics off limits might solve that by
on 2017-03-20 05:37:00 UTC
Link to this
It would also prevent older PPCers from having an advantage, because there's a lot of NSFW badfic. I've got a decent list, so I think I can handle that.
-
Re: Making NSFW/NSFB fics off limits might solve that by
on 2017-03-20 18:49:00 UTC
Link to this
I agree.
-
Why not specify... by
on 2017-03-19 08:27:00 UTC
Link to this
... that it has to be from a fic posted/updated in the last seven days? Or 'more recently than seven days before the game starts', to allow for stuff posted during the game. That lets you filter out stuff people already know, and I'm sure most archives let you sort by date. (Could be a month if you want to allow for smaller fandoms.
You could also ask people to name one fandon they'll be hunting in. Bonus points (no actual points included) go to people who choose smaller fandoms.
Looks interesting.
hS -
Re: Why not specify... by
on 2017-03-20 05:35:00 UTC
Link to this
I think the time limit on fics would be a good idea. I was trying to accomplish something similar with the ban on anything linked in the PPC wiki, but I think your idea accomplishes that better.
As for hunting only in a single fandom, I'm not sure about that. I have seen fandoms unexpectedly go dormant, and then not come out of hibernation on the expected date. However, it would also help prevent everyone from finding swarms of HP/LotR items. -
Re: Why not specify... by
on 2017-03-20 18:46:00 UTC
Link to this
I think we should be able to hunt across multiple fandoms and sites, but I like the time limit idea. It's too easy to just plunge into a glut of fifteen year old LOTR badfic Jay and Acacia could have taken on. Seven days seem a little restrictive to me, though. How about in the last month?
-
Sounds interesting, I'm open. (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 07:47:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Apologies and other stuff. by
on 2017-03-19 22:25:00 UTC
Link to this
First up, as you've probably noticed (and the main reason this is a separate post), I've changed my name. This has been something I've been thinking of doing for almost 6 months now, in some ways I've grown out of Storme Hawk, and in others I just prefer Novastorme. Also you can still contact me on stormehawk@gmail.com and thestormehawk@gmail.com, my Novastorme gmail is full of spammy emails from various games I have and I'm too lazy to change it.
Now, if you'd asked me on Wednesday, or even Thursday, what doxxing was I'd of honestly replied, "no idea." Before the actions of the Discord made its way onto the Board I had no idea about it, that there was a law against it, or anything like that really. I mean it was always one of those unspoken rules in my other community, but I never ran into any problems with it there, although then again we didn't really do idle chatter.
I'm saying this, not because I want to try and dodge some of the blame, or the 'disappointment' or whatever we're calling it now, but to give you some idea of, perhaps, why I didn't try and stop it as much as I could have done. Not that I really could have done a lot sitting in my Uni library at the time if I'm completely honest, although part of me is wondering where I would be in all this if I hadn't logged on to Discord and had simply concentrated on my work (my answer to that will come at a later point, probably not even in this post at all).
Still, I want to formally apologise to July. I tried not to get caught up in the witch hunt that occurred, not that I knew that that was what it was at that point in time. I tried to have some discussion surrounding the current rules, and in typing those out and through just generally not paying enough attention to the Discord I made the mistake of perhaps not sticking up for you, or your rights as much as I perhaps should have tried to do. I didn't realise what was fully going on, I didn't realise that sitting back and not really concentrating on it was not okay, hell I didn't even realise it was your full name at the top of the screenshot or your picture attached to your messages in it. But that doesn't excuse me, I should have realised that what was going on wasn't right, and as much as I wanted your side of things, just to look at and compare (for I always try and look at all sides of an argument before making a decision), I should of tried to stop what did happen from happening at all, and I should know from previous times that even in the pursuit of knowledge some things are inexcusable.
Ix, I'm sorry. I can't really form anything else into words, or how I feel into words. Just know you're not alone, if you ever need to talk to someone (and this goes to everyone reading this as well), and I'm around, let me know and I don't mind. I will listen and, if you want me to, I will help, I will contact and talk to whoever you want me to talk to, or I will keep what you want a secret to my dying breath (if it comes to that), I don't mind.
Novastorme, signing off
(Man it feels weird yet so nice to say that)
-
Shall we vote in an official capacity now? by
on 2017-03-19 22:29:00 UTC
Link to this
As everyone's votes are scattered about in the big post, I thought we should conglomerate them all in one place. If I've missed something or you just want to shout at me, email is clickable.
Firstly, on the subject of mods.
Should we have them?
If we do, who will they be?
Secondly, bans. Are we banning anyone? For how long?
And thirdly, the Discord. Any proposed changes, please say so.
Ok, I think that's everything, so, vote, i guess :/ -
I think this is dying down. (Tally.) by
on 2017-03-23 14:52:00 UTC
Link to this
Bans for Tomash
-Permaban: 2 (*Desdendelle, *PoorCynic)
-1 year ban: 1 ([EvilAI]UBEROverlord)
-3-6 month ban: 3 (*Iximaz, Sergio Turbo, Seafarer)
-1-3 month ban: 11 (Jay - Awesomeness Central, Phobos, doctorlit, OrangeYoshi99, Neshomeh, Novastorme, Tomash, Mattman the Comet, The Good Mod Addict, Akrinor, Zingenmir)
-TOTAL BANS: 17 [49% of total]
-NO BAN: 13 (*Aegis, *SkarmorySilver, *Granz, Huinesoron, DrGonzo, World-Jumper, Delta Juliette, Badger421, The Triumvirate, VixenMage, Matt Cipher, Alleb, Hieronymus Graubart)
-Explicit abstain: 5 (leafeyes, eatpraylove, Scapegrace, Ekyl, ninny4370)
-TOTAL VOTES: 35 (*6 + 29)
Drawing purely from this thread:
Board Mods
-Mods: 6 (Jay - Awesomeness Central, Novastorme, The Good Mod Addict, Ekyl, ninny4370, [EvilAI]UBEROverlord)
-No Mods: 15 60% of total
-Explicit abstain: 4 (leafeyes, eatpraylove, Scapegrace, The Triumvirate)
-TOTAL VOTES: 25
Discord Muting
-Involved users muted: 6 (*Scapegrace, Neshomeh, Sergio Turbo, Zingenmir, Alleb, Hieronymus Graubart)
-Discord closed: 1 (OrangeYoshi99) -
On Absentions by
on 2017-03-24 06:36:00 UTC
Link to this
I personally feel like they should be treated like the US Congress treats them. They do not factor into an actual vote. That's how you can have the Senate unanimously confirm a nomination with 92 votes instead of the actual unanimous 100. So for our purposes it is 17-13 in favor of a ban.
As for board moderators it would be 15-6 against moderators. -
Whoa, no. by
on 2017-03-23 17:37:00 UTC
Link to this
Not that it changes the tally, but I definitely did not vote for a ban.
I think there's a difference between doxxing classically (spreading someone's identifying details publicly, with an intent to harass/get them attacked) and not editing someone's real name out of a screenshot in a place you thought was private, only to realize it wasn't private.
For that reason, I don't consider what Tomash did consistent with punishing someone for "doxxing". -
:( I can count. I promise I can count. by
on 2017-03-23 17:45:00 UTC
Link to this
Hey, at least you get two votes, right? :-,
Yeah, I'm gonna go edit that for recordkeeping purposes.
I am very unclear how anyone can view the Discord - which you can access just by clicking a link, and which is infinitely searchable apparently - as any more private than the Board. But for some reason, people did think that.
hS -
It's all good. by
on 2017-03-25 16:33:00 UTC
Link to this
I honestly think it's just part of the feeling of the chat. I certainly don't think of it as being "as public" as the Board, even though it clearly is. I don't know that I can really explain it, either, so I'm aware this sounds absurd (and is a moot point, since Tomash is leaving for 2-3 months anyway), but a chat really does feel more private.
-
Well by
on 2017-03-25 16:55:00 UTC
Link to this
Here on the Board I can lurk quietly. If I lurked on the Discord, you could see I was there. I could look at the history later, of course, so it's not private. But there's just a slightly higher barrier to entry on the Discord.
-
What this means: by
on 2017-03-23 15:08:00 UTC
Link to this
1/ Around 50% of commentors feel Tomash should be banned for at least 1-3 months. This drops slightly if Desdendelle's vote is discounted following his departure.
Either: the 'abstain' votes should be discounted, and there is a firm majority (58%) in favour of banning Tomash, who should therefore be banned.
Or: the 'abstain' votes should count for the status quo, which means there is either an even split or a slight bias to letting Tomash stay; Tomash should therefore not be banned.
Or: the 'abstain' votes count with the majority, which means Tomash is banned by 63%.
I will not make this decision. I've been attacked too many times for 'being listened to' in this incident and others.
2/ 60% of the total voters (I'm not counting people who didn't comment on this at all) feel we should not have mods. If the abstainers are counted for the status quo or the majority, that jumps above 75%. The consensus is that we should not institute moderators.
3/ There is a strong undercurrent for muting certain people on the Discord for 1-3 months. I don't see any votes specifically dissenting from this.
Now someone needs to put themselves forward and decide when, and how, to call this.
hS -
I'm calling my ban vote (among other things) by
on 2017-03-23 19:11:00 UTC
Link to this
It's been a week, and we've seen 31 people vote, which is a large enough sample of the community to be representative (last few times I tried to count, the PPC had about 40 to 50 members). We also haven't seen "too many" abstains or calls to wait a bit, so that's not a validity issue either.
I personally feel that permabans need at least 2/3rds vote to stick. However, this was a vote on a temporary ban, so it's a lot less clear what the vote threshold should be. Then again, PPC votes are to a consensus, not a majority, and it's best to err on the side of caution with the sanctioning. So, I'm going to decide that there was no clear consensus on my ban, but that there was a very clear trend in favor of it that can't be ignored.
Despite this uncertainty, I think I need to be banned for a bit, and there's no reason I can't be harsher on myself than the community is. I made a terrible mistake that caused serious harm to July. There need to be consequences for that, and I personally don't feel punished enough by the apologies and the resignation.
Therefore, I'm announcing my ban from the PPC for 2-3 months. That is, until some point between May 23 and June 23 (I expect it'll be in early June) I won't be:
- Posting on the Board
- Present in the Discord
- Editing the wiki
I considered just muting myself on the Discord, but that felt like it would soften one of the parts of getting banned that feels bad, so I won't be doing that.
One exception: if I come up in the grievances thread next month, or if there is any voting, I'll be participating in those discussions. (well, also, I'll finish the discussion(s) I'm currently involved in if they get continued, but not drag them out)
I'll stay available by email (clickable above) and by Discord PM (I'mTomash#8833
) if anyone wants to keep in touch.
If the T-Board or archives have problems, please do contact me. I'll still be available to fix them.
As to the moderator vote, I'm going to propose a result, which everyone should feel free to ignore. Of the 21 people who voted, 70% of them (15 / 21 is about 0.7) are opposed to mods, which is a strong indicator that the community as a whole isn't particularly keen on the idea. That means that the result is no mods.
In a thread below, Maslab and Delta Juliette appear to have been elected Discord mods by 11 votes and no objections. Since that's not a sanction, and it looks like everyone either supports this or doesn't care enough to object, I think we can declare that election concluded.
On the mutes, I don't think we have enough participation to impose that sanction. However, I think that the people whose mutes are being called for should consider voluntarily muting themselves for a while.
So, yeah, bye guys. Sorry for my part in all this mess. -
Uh, okay. Consider yourself banned. by
on 2017-03-24 13:54:00 UTC
Link to this
Use the time to think about what you did, and why it was wrong. Think also about what you, personally, can do to ensure nothing of the sort ever happens again, and what you will do if it starts to.
Everyone who was involved in the Discord discussion, whether you choose to self-mute or not, should also have a long hard think along those lines. Remember that, under the Constitution, you have had the problem explained to you (at length), and in enough different ways that it's implausible for you to claim you didn't understand; if this sort of behaviour happens again, the community may decide that you have used up your second chance and are eligible for a ban.
(That's not intended as a threat or anything - just me making sure it's down in writing.)
hS -
Votes by
on 2017-03-23 14:08:00 UTC
Link to this
- No mods.
2. Nobody needs to be banned. But since we can't do nothing, let Tomash, Alleb, Granz and Khryssty be muted on Discord for three months. (I'm not sure whether this is an exhaustive list of main offenders.) Let everybody else who has seen this screenshot and didn't ask to take it down be muted for at least one month. This is, even if you showed some concern about taking it to the Board without blurring the face and real name, you still get one month. I'm so late because I tried to read through the log again and to decide who deserves two months, but I can't. It's difficult to follow the conversation and I probably don't get all the undertones; thus I can't really tell who contributed how much to the unhealthy atmosphere, and every decision I made would feel unjust. Now that you had time to think about it, may I just ask all of you to sort yourself into House Three-Months, House Two-Months, House One-Month and House Totally-Innocent? (This may be a mute point. Since I didn't see Des giving the Keys to anybody else, I have no idea what will happen to the Discord.)
3. Abstain.
HG
- No mods.
-
My votes. by
on 2017-03-22 19:50:00 UTC
Link to this
I vote no ban for Tomash.
I vote for my own 1-3 month muting on the Discord.
I vote for Maslab and Delta as Discord mods.
-Alleb -
Behold, some votes. by
on 2017-03-22 16:36:00 UTC
Link to this
- No Board mods. Between the Nameless Admin being able to change or take down posts if necessary (and deal with trolls and spambots and so on), and level-headed people in general stepping in when things get heated in the 'this is no longer a friendly debate' sense (seriously, we've had almost entirely polite political debates. In most cases, we're capable of not even needing someone to step in on the Board), I don't think mods are necessary nor do I see what they'd really add. At most, it'd be a tiny bit of extra authority for a level-headed person who's stepping in to tell people to go cool off, and since it'd also come with a bunch more extra stress for that person/those people, it doesn't seem like a great trade-off. My vote is no mods.
2. I am not touching this. I do not want to touch this. This entire affair disgusts me and I do not want to spend even more time trying (and mostly failing) to sort out what I think an appropriate response would be. At most (okay, I'm touching it a little bit), I suppose I agree with Tomash (and a number of other people) that he should take a break for a bit. How long that break actually is, I'll let the rest of you decide. I support 2-3 months as the minimum, though I'm not sure anything less than that has even been suggested (I stand corrected, there's 1 month in there too. I don't support 1 month; put me down as 2-3 minimum).
Actually, one more thing: there was a proposal a while back to mute some of the users who'd been involved in the anti-July...'discussion' (and I'm using that word loosely). That is, to mute them on the Discord for, I believe, 1-3 months, or maybe 1-2. I support that idea (at 1-2 months) for the people who were most involved--not for everyone, but for the people who were really spearheading it. Guys, you need to learn to take a step back and think for a bit when emotions are running high, especially your own. You need to learn to take a break and cool off. Even if that means actually saying 'I am not clear-headed right now and I'm going to take a break and come back in a few hours/tomorrow. Please don't make any important decisions without me. Please take a step back yourselves if you feel your anger is clouding your judgement as well.' If muting you will make you think about it and make the idea stick in your memory, I am all for it.
This also applies when you don't yet have a strong opinion of your own. Take a step back if you need to, read up on what's going on, get more information. Don't judge blindly based on one bit of information that you have no context for. Again, you can explicitly state that that's what you're doing: 'I don't have enough information about this yet, and I'm going to step away from this discussion until I know more.' Either that or call for more information for everyone. It doesn't hurt to learn more, and it doesn't hurt to reserve judgement until you do. Try it.
You are all adults or young adults (yes, I'm including the teenagers in this). If you don't have this skill yet, you need to try to build it. This is a community of real people, even if many of us will never meet; and you need those skills both for here in the PPC (and in any other online community you will ever join) as well as in the real world, for your jobs and your lives and your friends and your families and potentially your SOs. Learn how to take a step back and cool off in tense situations. I promise you, you need this skill. We all need this skill. I strongly suggest you work on it, and that goes for everyone here who doesn't already have it, whether you were involved in this discussion or not. It's a very useful skill to have, and developing it is one way to guard against things like what happened last week.
Votes summed up: Break or ban for Tomash for 2-3 months minimum. Mute the users who were most involved in the July...'discussion' for at least 1-2 months on the Discord server. Everyone, work on learning how to take a step back to cool off when emotions are running high. Also consider waiting for more information before judging a complex situation in the future.
3. The Discord. Hrm. Well, I agree with a few of the things that have been mentioned, and they range from serious to minor.
A. Yes please do a 'best of the Discord' post (as proposed here). Or maybe make it a blog on the wiki that gets linked to from the Board whenever a new post goes up. It could also be linked to from the wiki page called "PPC Lounge," and if it's a post, the information should be archived and linked to there or else transferred onto the page. I think it's a great way to bridge the gap between Boarders and Discorders (both for Boarders who never go there and for Discorders who've been away for a while and want to know what they've missed). It's also a great way to share some fun things, and maybe even snippets of especially good RPs from time to time? This might actually work better as a collaborative Board post (one person starts it every, say, month, and other Discorders slowly or quickly add things to it. Please remember that if you want to share something that's a quote or an RP piece rather than just a general 'this is something that generally happens', you need to get the permission of everyone involved. In fact, do that anyway. Another idea for things to add to this: bits of some of the punversations. Again, with the permission of everyone involved). This could also be done in the format of putting the information from the Board post into a wiki blog post, which is then linked to on the "PPC Lounge" page. People could even take turns making the blog post, so that the responsibility doesn't all fall on one person.
B. I think hS has some good points in his 'About the Discord:' post below. I'm just going to comment on the ones I either agree with completely or would modify slightly.
Case in point: I'd modify the positive discussion a little, since I know how much easier it can be to express your opinion of a new mission in chat form: do that in the Discord if you like, but then post it on the Board. While it's very nice if the author happens to have a friend who hangs out in the Discord and will pass it on, it's really not the same as seeing the words yourself. So rephrase it, copy and paste what you yourself said, get a volunteer to compile a review from what several people have said/agreed with--and post it on the Board.
As for making decisions in the Discord...yeah. If it's a big, important decision, if it's even something like a big PPC canon question (that would, say, change the canon or add something major to it) that could use more than 1-2 answers from people who know what they're talking about, I'd say put it on the Board. If it's a very emotional decision that isn't a personal, non-PPC related question (say, if you have a grievance or you're thinking of leaving or something and it's something you want to discuss publicly rather than talking only to the people or person involved in private or in private with someone willing to mediate there as well), bring it to the Board. Let it move slower, let it simmer, let people have time to weigh in and most importantly to think about it before they weigh in. Obviously some matters won't fall under this, and if you're only comfortable talking it through via DMs or group DMS as opposed to publicly in the Discord or publicly on the Board, keep it there. But if it's a big PPC-related decision, or something that you want a lot of hopefully well-thought out opinions on--bring it to the Board. I agree with hS that it won't solve everything--but it should certainly help in a lot of cases. And it also ensures that a, you get a mix of oldbies and newbies responding instead of just whoever happens to be on at the time, b, people who don't feel qualified to answer can leave it for someone else, and c, people who don't initially know how to answer get a chance to think it through and come up with something if they can.
C. I vote against closing the Discord entirely, whether short-term or long-term. I don't think that's necessary and I don't think it'll solve anything.
Discord votes summed up: A 'best of the Discord' post or blog post every month or so would be amazing. I support bringing most big decisions to the Board, especially if they're PPC community-related or PPC canon-related. And I do not support closing the Discord entirely, whether short-term or long-term.
~Zingenmir
- No Board mods. Between the Nameless Admin being able to change or take down posts if necessary (and deal with trolls and spambots and so on), and level-headed people in general stepping in when things get heated in the 'this is no longer a friendly debate' sense (seriously, we've had almost entirely polite political debates. In most cases, we're capable of not even needing someone to step in on the Board), I don't think mods are necessary nor do I see what they'd really add. At most, it'd be a tiny bit of extra authority for a level-headed person who's stepping in to tell people to go cool off, and since it'd also come with a bunch more extra stress for that person/those people, it doesn't seem like a great trade-off. My vote is no mods.
-
On Discord stuff by
on 2017-03-23 05:58:00 UTC
Link to this
I was a bit vague when proposing the "best of", so I might as well say that I like the idea of it being a collaborative Board thread (that someone summarizes for the Wiki after it's done, probably).
On asking permission to quote, I agree it's best to do that just to be on the safe side. In theory, no one should be saying anything in Discord they'd object to getting plastered onto the front page of the Board, but in practice, the chat is a bit more private (you can't read it without some indication you might be doing so) and a bit more spontaneous, so you want to make sure everyone's OK with being quoted.
Agreed on the modifications to the bit about positive discussion, especially where missions and such are concerned. I definitely remember when Nesh posted her latest mission two months back (wow, I could have sworn it was longer ago) I said a few words about it in chat (rot13'd) that eventually ended up in my Board review. I'll also admit to giving people their reviews (especially if they're vague and underdeveloped thoughts) over chat instead of on the Board if we're both around.
Additionally, it's practice on the Discord that if you expect someone will be on soon (say, within a day) and you think they should see some bit of discussion (for example, you think they'd be interested in the fic you linked), you @mention them so they can jump to it and read it. This is a good system, but we should keep in mind that tagging someone in on a conversation about them doesn't automatically make it not be behind their back.
I don't think I've seen community decision-making over chat. However, the discussion has very occasionally veered into topics that would probably be more appropriate for a Board post, and we should be less hesitant to take matters here.
Public chat isn't the place for grievances and drama, I agree. It's sort of the worst of both worlds compared to taking it to a private discussion or posting on the Board, . -
The Discord has regularly tried to make decisions. by
on 2017-03-23 10:09:00 UTC
Link to this
It discussed what language was acceptable. Its mods agreed they wanted a channel. It extensively discussed its reaction to GlarnBoudin. It decided that palindromordnilap was behind this incident, and that it was appropriate to post her real name to the Board.
It decided there were deep problems in the community. It decided that Ekyl was not a problem. It decided JulyFlame was a problem. It tried to decide what action to take against JulyFlame. It decided that Granz's 'new server' should be taken down.
No, in most cases, the Discord hasn't come to a decision before bringing it to the Board (though how many times have you had a conversation that went 'is this person's behaviour a problem? No, I don't think it is'? A negative decision is still a decision). But that doesn't matter.
As soon as the issue of appropriate language came up, it should have gone to the Board. As soon as Granz's behaviour became a topic of discussion, it should have gone to the Board. As soon as issues with moderator coordination came up, it should have gone to the Board. As soon as the not-palin screenshot was brought up, it should have gone to the Board.
Etcetera. Etcetera. Et-flipping-cetera.
The Discord is not the place to make PPC-related decisions. Ever. As soon as it becomes apparent that a decision needs to be made - as soon as you're asking yourselves 'what can we do about this?' - the discussion needs to be shut down and taken directly to the Board. To do otherwise is to treat non-Discorders as second-class citizens - people who don't deserve a say in the early stages of a discussion, but only get brought in once the Discord has decided on the shape of the conversation.
It's abundantly clear that live chat leads to conversations sliding out of control. Unless you can think of a way to permanently stop that happening, I maintain that having an unshakable rule is the best option:
You don't talk about anyone who isn't there. And you don't even try to make PPC decisions.
Ever.
hS -
I don't entirely agree with you by
on 2017-03-23 18:55:00 UTC
Link to this
I think you're being a tiny bit too absolutist here. For example, those "negative decisions" often serve as a useful reality check to keep knee-jerk reactions off the Board.
However, I certainly support Rule N: "Substantive discussion about the PPC community or canon should be kept on the Board." -
"Oh, but this isn't substantive." by
on 2017-03-23 19:01:00 UTC
Link to this
"We're still just discussing what should be done
toabout July. Once we've come to some conclusions - gotten past the knee-jerk stage of things, reached a starting point for the proper debate - then we'll take it to the Board."
Remind me again how good the Discord's judgement is of what's appropriate?
hS -
Not as terrible as you seem to think it is by
on 2017-03-23 19:24:00 UTC
Link to this
Sure, some very serious mistakes were made with the July situation, but I'm not as convinced as you are that this is a pervasive issue.
However, you have a valid point there. That is, I agree we need to be a lot more careful about not using the Discord to pre-frame a discussion before it comes up on the Board. There's probably a better wording for the rule that will catch that sort of thing while permitting the significantly more frequent conversation that goes
A: [does something that's a bit uncool, like swearing or starting to veer into getting snipy at someone]
B: You shouldn't do the thing/edit your post/...
A: Sorry. [if possible, fixes the thing]
which I'm firmly convinced is not a Board-level issue -
Re: getting permission to quote, and more suggestions by
on 2017-03-23 06:20:00 UTC
Link to this
It's partially also a question of "I think this RP was awesome, do you mind if I put this chunk of it up on the Board?" "...eh, sure, I like how that one came out." or "If you *really* want to, but I don't like that piece of it, and that bit looks really OOC to me...I'd rather you didn't." or even "Sure, but I really don't like that one line I wrote at the end there, would you mind cutting it earlier?" Stuff like that. In some cases, it's less a question of 'is this public or private' and more 'do you, the author, think this is as good as I do and are okay with my bringing attention to it.'
So that's another side of getting permission to quote things from the Discord on the Board; I know I've participated in some RPs there that I really liked and in another couple where I felt uninspired at the time and think it was reflected in my writing. I'd personally probably be okay with both types being quoted here, but I would want to add a note to the post explaining why I think one of them is a better example of my writing or something like that.
(I used RPs as an example here, but it'd work pretty similarly with jokes and so on).
Another thing that could be brought to the Board is the recs and plugs channel. We do occasionally end up with an OT thread where people recommend music and stories and whatever else; maybe there could be one a little more frequently? Could be something to consider (though I'd say definitely have only one on the front page at a time if it catches on).
Of course, another piece of the Discord that frequently gets moved to recs and plugs is talk about badfic. Some readings have been recorded and made their way to the Board before, but you've also got a bunch of written snarking going on. I'm not sure whether this would really work as a thing to bring to the Board, especially since presumably some of it gets transferred into either a mission or a note on the Unclaimed Badfic page (at least...I think some of these are being claimed or put on the unclaimed list? I could be wrong). It is a thing that happens, though. Maybe it'd be best suited to a note or two in the potential collaborative Board thread or blog post (it could be summarized with some included quotes of badfic and snark? Highlights style!)
Anyway. This isn't really an attempt to add to my votes--it's just more suggestions for the development of a 'Best of Discord' thing combined with an...additional clarification? I'm going to go with that and call it a day.
Good night,
~Zing -
Updated tally. by
on 2017-03-22 11:44:00 UTC
Link to this
Votes carried over from the previous thread are *asterisked.
-Permaban: 2 (*Desdendelle, *PoorCynic)
-1 year ban: 1 ([EvilAI]UBEROverlord)
-3-6 month ban: 3 (*Iximaz, Sergio Turbo, Seafarer)
-1-3 month ban: 11 (Jay - Awesomeness Central, Phobos, doctorlit, OrangeYoshi99, Neshomeh, VixenMage, Novastorme, Tomash, Mattman the Comet, The Good Mod Addict, Akrinor)
-TOTAL BANS: 17 [50% of total]
-NO BAN: 12 (*Aegis, *SkarmorySilver, *Granz, *Hieronymus Graubart, Huinesoron, DrGonzo, World-Jumper, Delta Juliette, Badger421, The Triumvirate, VixenMage, Matt Cipher)
-Explicit abstain: 5 (leafeyes, eatpraylove, Scapegrace, Ekyl, ninny4370)
-TOTAL VOTES: 34 (*7 + 27)
Drawing purely from this thread:
-Mods: 6 (Jay - Awesomeness Central, Novastorme, The Good Mod Addict, Ekyl, ninny4370, [EvilAI]UBEROverlord)
-No Mods: 13 52% of total
-Explicit abstain: 4 (leafeyes, eatpraylove, Scapegrace, The Triumvirate)
-Implicit abstain: 2 (Phobos, doctorlit)
-TOTAL VOTES: 25
hS -
My votes by
on 2017-03-22 00:05:00 UTC
Link to this
1) I vote no mods.
2) I vote for a ban of 1 month at most for Tomash
3)I support the notion of keeping the Discord. -
If my votes count... by
on 2017-03-21 11:33:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm going with no mods on Discord (that was the very original idea that was circulating while setting up the server) and no bans.
-
Tgh server already has mods by
on 2017-03-21 16:49:00 UTC
Link to this
This vote is about board mods.
-
Why wouldn't they? by
on 2017-03-21 16:49:00 UTC
Link to this
It's a community vote and you're a member of the community.
-
Tally: everything still up in the air. by
on 2017-03-21 10:05:00 UTC
Link to this
Votes carried over from the previous thread are *asterisked.
-Permaban: 2 (*Desdendelle, *PoorCynic)
-3-6 month ban: 3 (*Iximaz, Sergio Turbo, Seafarer)
-Long-term ban (unspecified): 1 (*[EvilAI]UBEROverlord)
-1-3 month ban: 10 (Jay - Awesomeness Central, Phobos, doctorlit, OrangeYoshi99, Neshomeh, VixenMage, Novastorme, Tomash, Mattman the Comet, The Good Mod Addict)
-TOTAL BANS: 16 [48% of total]
-NO BAN: 12 (*Akrinor, *Alleb, *Aegis, *SkarmorySilver, *Granz, *Hieronymus Graubart, Huinesoron, DrGonzo, World-Jumper, Delta Juliette, Badger421, The Triumvirate)
-Explicit abstain: 5 (leafeyes, eatpraylove, Scapegrace, Ekyl, ninny4370)
-TOTAL VOTES: 33 (*10 + 23)
And drawing purely from this thread:
-Mods: 5 (Jay - Awesomeness Central, Novastorme, The Good Mod Addict, Ekyl, ninny4370)
-No Mods: 12 52% of total
-Explicit abstain: 4 (leafeyes, eatpraylove, Scapegrace, The Triumvirate)
-Implicit abstain: 2 (Phobos, doctorlit)
-TOTAL VOTES: 23
There is currently an absolute majority against mods, though this can easily change. There is not an absolute majority in favour of banning Tomash, though again, if one of the previous thread's no ban votes flips, there would be.
There has been some discussion previously on whether explicitly abstaining votes count in favour of the status quo (which would be 'no ban, no mods'), or should just be discounted altogether (and therefore exist basically to say 'yup, I read this thread'). Whenever you announce the decision, you should probably decide which interpretation you favour - it's the difference between Tomash having 48% or 57% in favour of banning him right now.
hS -
Clarification of my stances by
on 2017-03-22 02:00:00 UTC
Link to this
I'll specify that the term for Tomash should be 1 year. I think that sufficiently demonstrates the severity of the situation.
As for Board Moderation, I am in favor of either a moderator or moderators. -
Moderators, plural, surely. by
on 2017-03-22 02:02:00 UTC
Link to this
Having only one mod would be a recipe for disaster. Sure, Nameless Admin could step in if need be, but it's still huge potential for abuse.
-
Administrative questions by
on 2017-03-21 17:37:00 UTC
Link to this
- I'm pretty sure VM voted for no ban in this thread
2. On the other hand, I don't think Alleb's post has anything to say about bans other than that she shouldn't get one. That might count as an implicit abstain, but I think that's your call.
3. Is this a majority vote? I don't recall most of our previous ban votes (or any votes for that matter) being decided on the basis of a majority. Then again, a lot of the previous votes weren't so evenly split, so I don't think we ever had to settle the question of what exactly a community consensus looks like.
The counting of abstain votes is a bit of a tricky question, and I'll probably write up my thoughts once I figure out what they are.
3b. Who's "you" in "when you announce the decision"? As far as I'm concerned, you (hS) are the person who felt bothered to start counting, which means you get to set the specifics of how to count (and to a degree how to decide the vote) unless they're outlandish enough that someone objects to them.
- I'm pretty sure VM voted for no ban in this thread
-
Adminiature answers. by
on 2017-03-21 17:49:00 UTC
Link to this
- Correct.
2. I could've sworn it did, but correct. (I'm not counting implicit abstains from the previous thread, for the record.)
3b. Absolutely not. I don't know if you were around, but during the Data Junkie ban vote I was made so miserable by being the person who Had To Make The Decisions (and was Making Them Wrong, according to various people) that I had to hand it over to Desdendelle. I flat out refuse to make any calls whatsoever here other than my own vote. I did a tally to help out if the person who does that wanted to include the votes from the other thread; I am not making this decision.
And that counts as my answer for 3. as well. I'm not deciding that.
hS
- Correct.
-
Votes by
on 2017-03-21 08:07:00 UTC
Link to this
1) I am for mod, we need some form of power here, to maintain order 2) I'm gonna abstain, I want to keep my head attached.
-
Who's after your head? by
on 2017-03-21 10:06:00 UTC
Link to this
The vote is really evenly split, so if someone goes all Psycho on the opposition they'll have a lot of people to work through.
hS -
Votes. by
on 2017-03-21 02:41:00 UTC
Link to this
I will let my ban vote stand.
On moderators, I have to say no. The source of the current issue was that many of us (including me) acted on incomplete information. That's not something that having mods would have prevented, and I agree with many people here that we've done a good job of keeping this place civil without any.
As I don't visit the Discord, I have no opinion on its functioning. -
Votes by
on 2017-03-21 02:13:00 UTC
Link to this
- Yes to mods. We've tried anarchy, it hasn't worked.
2. Abstain. Conflict of interest since I'm one of the ones whose heads have been called for.
3. I think the Discord is fine, we just have to be far more diligent in there.
- Yes to mods. We've tried anarchy, it hasn't worked.
-
On the Votes: by
on 2017-03-21 00:12:00 UTC
Link to this
I only have a vote for bans, which is that no bans be made.
-
Abstention on all counts. My judgement is terrible. (nm) by
on 2017-03-20 23:13:00 UTC
Link to this
-
My vote. by
on 2017-03-20 22:51:00 UTC
Link to this
Mods: I don't think we need mods on the Board.The Nameless Admin, so far, has been more than enough in my humble opinion.
Bans:
- A medium term "global" ban for Tomash (3-6 months). One year bans are usually reserved for those who don't come to their senses and apologize, while Tomash did - but, at the same time, apologizing should not be a "get-out-of-jail" card when very serious offenses are made. It is not a matter of revenge, or punishment for punishment's sake, but a matter of consequences, as I mentioned in my other post.
- A short-medium Discord ban for the ones involved in the witch-hunting (1-3 months), coupled with a shorter Board ban as well (2 weeks - 1 month), with the same reasoning as above.
About the Discord, I'm afraid I have no ideas. I've never been a big user of large chatrooms, after all. -
This seems mostly wrapped up, but I'll throw in my votes. by
on 2017-03-20 22:08:00 UTC
Link to this
- Mods would be good, I think. I know I can't be trusted to do the right thing in telling people something isn't okay, let alone actually dangerous to someone's health in some way. I don't have any suggestions on who should be a mod, though.
2. Bans. I feel a bit uncomfortable voting on this one, but I think a 3-month ban for Tomash might be needed. Considering the lack of consensus, though, I doubt that will happen.
3. The Discord. I don't think anything needs to be changed, but I do like the idea of having all of us become more educated on the subject of cyberbullying. If we can find good online resources about how to recognize it and break the mob mentality, that would be great going forward. Assuming such resources are found, it may be a good idea to link them in the Wiki next to the space about the Discord, and post them in the notice channel for good measure.
Unfortunately, I don't know good resources for information on that. I'm just throwing ideas around. I am not in favor of getting rid of the Discord, either temporarily or permanently, but I also think that changing nothing isn't going to be helpful to anyone.
- Mods would be good, I think. I know I can't be trusted to do the right thing in telling people something isn't okay, let alone actually dangerous to someone's health in some way. I don't have any suggestions on who should be a mod, though.
-
Votes by
on 2017-03-20 20:34:00 UTC
Link to this
I vote for a 1-3 month ban for Tomash, as priorly mentioned in my ban revision thread.
I also vote no mods, for obvious reasons.
I would like to second Tomash's idea for a "Best of" page on the wiki. In the meantime, my CAHQ deck "Cards Against Boarders" should suffice. -
Votes by
on 2017-03-20 18:55:00 UTC
Link to this
No mods. I happen to think that our anarchic culture mostly works. In general, we do a good job of being friendly, calling each other on our bad behavior, and being remorseful and honestly trying to improve when we screw up. If you look around all the threads that spawned from this whole mess, you'll find piles of our community working as it should.
That doesn't mean we're perfect. The entire witch-hunt in the Discord is a prime example of that. While that was going on, many of us stopped acting the way we should and either turned into an angry mob or stood there and didn't call anyone out on what they were doing. We need to examine how and why that happened, and make serious efforts to not do things like that again. Hopefully we can learn appropriate lessons from what went down that will make the PPC an even better place to hang out on the Internet.
Now, on my ban. I'm going to do something that I don't remember happening before, and vote for my own ban. I'm in favor of my being banned for 1-3 months, either from the Discord or from participation in the PPC generally. There have to be consequences for what I did. It doesn't feel right for me to get away with just a resignation after what I did, even if it was a mistake. The vote seems to be (at the time of writing) split exactly evenly between banning me or not, so it looks like i might be going harder on myself than the community is.
Now, on the Discord, this isn't a proposal for massive changes. However, I'm now (especially since July's post got me reading some of the old discussions about the IRC and drama there) slightly concerned about the possibility of a cultural split between PPCers who visit the chat often and PPCers who don't. I figure one small thing that can be done to try and make sure we don't get this is for, every once in a while, people to "best of" the chat and summarize the longer-lasting jokes/trends onto the Board and/or Wiki. (We already have a wiki page for chat quotes from back in the IRC days, might be worth revitalizing).
To give an example of what I'm on about, Maslab has a reputation in chat for puns. That reputation was long-standing and widespread enough that we ended up adding Maslab's avatar (a picture of a fox) as a custom emoticon on the Discord. So, if you're in chat and you make a pretty good (or pretty bad, but what's the difference?) pun, you're likely to get your message reacted to with a :Maslab: . Now some of y'all who don't really visit chat know a bit more about what we've been up to in there other than starting mobs and drama. -
My votes. by
on 2017-03-20 18:43:00 UTC
Link to this
1) No mods. In addition to the issues others have raised, I feel mods are ill-suited to our community. They depend, I think, on a certain level of detachment from all parties involved in a dispute. That lack of bias seems rather more difficult to attain in a close knit community like ours. Perhaps they could be made to work, but would they work so much better than what we have now as to justify the change? I don't think so. Then again, I've never really been part of a community that uses them, so perhaps this is simply my inexperience talking.
2) No bans. As I mentioned in my previous post, if disciplinary action must be taken, I don't think bans are the right tool.
3) I can't think of anything we can do to improve the Discord, so I'll abstain from that vote. -
Tally update. by
on 2017-03-20 18:14:00 UTC
Link to this
Because I'm antsy and maths calms me down.
-Permaban: 2
-6 month ban: 4
-Long-term ban (unspecified): 1
-1-3 month ban: 6
-TOTAL BANS: 13
-NO BAN: 13
-Explicit abstain: 3
-TOTAL VOTES: 29
And drawing purely from this thread:
-Mods: 1
-No Mods: 7
hS -
Votes by
on 2017-03-20 17:59:00 UTC
Link to this
1) No mods. What we need is a culture change, and those don't happen top-down. Additionally, there's no way to ensure that mods don't engage in this behavior also.
2) No bans. If Tomash wants to take a leave of absence, I support his decision, but if the person harmed by this doesn't think he should be banned, I think it's a bad idea - partly because of the "symbolic" nature of it. We'd be doing this to make it feel like someone had been punished, which is not a substitute for fixing the problem. Tomash made a mistake- the first time he's done something like this - and moved quickly to repair the damage once he realized it was a mistake.
3) The Discord. Keep it. Have an honest, serious conversation with the people involved in this about what went wrong, why, and how they can move as individuals to stop it happening again. Again, what we need is a culture change. And, preferably, also, not one mod to step in, but for everyone involved to say "Wait, we're rushing this out of emotion. Let's take a step back and let people's heads cool." -
Request for clarification by
on 2017-03-20 20:51:00 UTC
Link to this
When you called for a "culture change", I interpreted that as saying there's some way we typically act here that's a bad thing and needs to change. That is, I think you said that some aspect of what the PPC is and how it conducts its affairs is part of the reason for all the stuff that happened these last few days. If that's what you meant, could you please spell out in more detail what needs to be different?
To restate my position and to mention the other thing I think you might have wanted to say, I think that the general problem recently was caused by a significant failure on our parts (well, certainly on those of us who were participating in chat Thursday) to live up to our ideals. We need to examine how that happened (mostly on a personal level, I figure, since, after all, the community is made up of each of us), and make efforts to not slip up so drastically again, but the way our community functions is generally fine. -
Hmmm. Hard to say, exactly. by
on 2017-03-21 03:17:00 UTC
Link to this
This might sound weird and backwards, but my instinct is actually that we have an obsession with rooting out bullies that seems to often turn into bullying. Rather than focusing on behavior, we focus on people. I was one person who thought July's behavior was bullying, several years ago, but since her behavior of late has been eminently reasonable - when she's even been around, which is rarely - it made absolutely no sense to target her as The Bully. To bring up an historical moment, back when the big IRC drama broke, there was also that question of Who Is/Are The Real Bullies Here? It was a moot point; both parties engaged in bad behavior. Likewise, as soon as the "witch hunt" scandal broke, and it became obvious that July was the victim here, not the perpetrator, the tide turned and folk went looking for a new bully figure - which turned out to be you (or, depending on who you ask, Desdendelle). This has been a pattern in the past. Data and Toroll's behavior was a serious problem;
rather thanalong with addressing trolling, we fixated on Is Data Enough of a Jerk to Ban* and Who Is Toroll, which I still think was/is an almost entirely useless question. Frequently hS comes up as target for Tyrannical Dictator of PPC Discussion because people listen to his opinion. Less frequently, Neshomeh gets tarred with a less-opaque version of that brush.
Only rarely have we had open-and-shut cases of bullies as the horns-and-pitchfork version we like them to be. Usually it's more like this. July has a problem with Matt Cipher. She disengages with him. He pokes her on a public space and she calls him out, then, because Matt Is Not A Bully (you can tell, we're friends with him and he doesn't have horns or a pitchfork), people tell July off for causing a ruckus. If Matt had enough people mad at him, I'm guessing it would have gone the other way. I have a problem with Scapegrace's recent behavior, because they flew off the handle and sent cruel messages to July, openly proclaimed their hypocrisy in a Board thread without really apologizing for it, denied involvement in the witch hunt, but Scapegrace isn't "A Bully," they're a person who performed behaviors that were hurtful and problematic. I honestly think that if we addressed behaviors rather than people, we'd be dealing with the problem far more effectively, but banhammers, to quote a wise and sensible person, are a blunt force tool, not a precision instrument, and rather than address issues by enforcing mediation (which enables a "You as a person do this behavior, and it needs to stop" approach), we usually address them by calling for, then voting on, a ban (which encourages a "You as a person did this, and you need to be punished" approach).
Good grief was that a lengthy and complicated answer to a simple question.
TL;DR We need to address behaviors and not people. Punishing people is an ineffective means to address change in a community.
*Graduated-length banning was one step away from this Punish People Who Are Bad mentality, and a step in the right direction, but I think it didn't go far enough. -
A brief word: by
on 2017-03-21 15:01:00 UTC
Link to this
I deny being involved with the witch hunt on the Discord for the very simple reason that I wasn't bloody involved with it you have the chatlogs read them. Unless you wish to challenge that assertion, we have nothing further to discuss.
-
Yeah, I suppose that was a bit passive aggressive of me. by
on 2017-03-21 15:15:00 UTC
Link to this
What I mean is that you were one of the people calling out July as A Bad Person, and saying something should be done before the matter was allowed to drop.
To wit:
scapegrace-Yesterday at 12:53 PM
Or we can watch hS tell us all that nothing's wrong and everything's fine and this was an isolated incident, and we'll all go "well, he'd know, he's hS", and nothing will happen, because nothing ever happens, because nothing happening is the easiest way to cope with things.
[snip]
SergioTurbo-Yesterday at 12:54 PM
If he goes "nothing happened", I'm the first who'll be very disappointed and the first to say that no, something HAS happened.
scapegrace-Yesterday at 12:55 PM
Not really what I meant, Sarge.
He won't say nothing happened, he'll say it's sad and he wishes them well and we'll go about our usual business and in a month it'll all be forgotten.
Because something else will have come along, and Nesh might have got another gobbet of Subjugation done, and something else might have happened, or hey, a cool Plort RP for us to sink our teeth into, or something, or something else.
And we will forget.
Ekyl-Yesterday at 12:58 PM
Unless we don't allow it to be forgotten.
scapegrace-Yesterday at 12:59 PM
Like we didn't allow the furore surrounding Brink to be forgotten.
Or some of the other stuff.
Or the ending to Rose Potter - that was fairly controversial among some pillars of the community, no names, just look for the burnt month.
Jay - Awesomeness Central-Yesterday at 1:00 PM
burnt month?
scapegrace-Yesterday at 1:00 PM
Work it out.
Look, Scape, I'm saying you got caught up in the heat of the moment and said stupid things in anger. Which happens to everyone at some point or other. And later on, I realized I did see you apologize for your part in this. It's just, I don't like the "Yeah, well, I'm a hypocrite instead of an apology, and I don't like acting like the exchange up there is somehow separate from everything surrounding it.
That said, as soon as I posted it I realized I should've said something to you directly, and, in fact, not doing so while calling for better ways to handle this was …hypocritical. I apologize for that. -
De nada. I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't accept it. by
on 2017-03-21 16:42:00 UTC
Link to this
And we couldn't have that, now could we? =]
Also, I don't think it's exactly unfair or calling out July as "A Bad Person" (she isn't, I'm just done with her) to mention that she really didn't like the ending to the Rose Potter mission. She, er, didn't. How is that anything other than a statement of fact? -
I mean it contributed to the tone. by
on 2017-03-22 05:05:00 UTC
Link to this
And you didn't just say she didn't like the ending to Rose Potter, you linked "the PPC forgetting about stuff" with "the burnt month" and mentioned that you were quite angry about all of it. You also, during this same period of time, sent July a message in which you told her to leave the PPC and said other cruel things to her. Nova says that was about some unrelated thing, and you say this Rose Potter mention was about some unrelated thing.
So we've got: you're angry, you point out what you perceive July's role in the PPC's forget-about-scandals culture, and you send July an angry message.
Maybe they are all unrelated. I certainly would not know, I'm not in your head and I don't know your motivations. But they all strike me as behavior that contributed to the state of emotional affairs currently in place.
I'm sorry for bringing this up in a stupid, passive-aggressive way, and I'm sorry for bludgeoning you with it. And honestly, if I am waaay off base and taking you horrifically out of context, I'm sorry for that too. Look: everyone has been angry throughout this. It started as a misunderstanding of Iximaz's reading of a situation between her and July, was exacerbated by a frenzied conversation on the Discord which was, of course, fueled by very real concern for Iximaz, and then exploded onto the Board, first as a PPC Bullying/July (because of Iximaz's post) problem, then as a Wait, There Was Doxxing?! problem, now as a What Do We Do About It conversation. At no point, I'm sure, have we all been super calm and rational about this.
So in essence - I'm still confused about how you think you didn't contribute to the witch hunt, but I'm sorry for attacking you as a person on the Board, literally in a post saying we should stop doing that, wow I'm kind of an idiot. -
A Note on Scape's message. by
on 2017-03-21 13:42:00 UTC
Link to this
I have been talking to them, and according to them the post sent to July is independent of the goings on Discord and the Board. It was also not the entire message, and there are reasons behind both the message itself and why Scape hasn't said anything on the Board about it, that I'm not going to reveal at this moment in time. And probably won't unless Scape gives me permission to.
-
Well, I did ask for detail, and I got it by
on 2017-03-21 04:08:00 UTC
Link to this
(warning, rambling post that covers several not-unrelated topics ahead)
This all makes sense.
As I alluded to in a post a while back, when the permaban calls started flying, it felt like I'd become the target of the angry mob that had been running around looking for a target. Good to know that wasn't just me who noticed that. (obligatory caveat, doesn't mean I didn't do anything wrong and that there shouldn't be consequences.)
On the general point, I have nothing to back this up right now, but I suspect that pinning a narrative on someone (X is a jerk, Y is power-hungry, Z exaggerates everything, etc.) is a really easy thought for humans to have. The easy thoughts require less energy than the complicated, nuanced ones about people's behavior, so we tend to fall into them. I can't possibly say if there's a good solution to this. (Well, there's "everyone try really hard to not think this way", which could merit a line in the Constitution at best but doesn't really solve anything)
Now, I'm going to possibly be a bit annoying and call for specifics again. I read a call near the end to "enforce mediation" and "address behaviors and not people". That sound great, but what do we do? Should we explicitly try to change our community patterns of conduct (I'm not saying rules because this isn't a rules question, unless we want something sitting in the Constitution about this)? To what? What should, I, or any other member of the PPC, start or stop doing to make your proposal happen?
What would have happened/would be about to happen to me in a more-behavior focused PPC after that screwup?
Finally, small question that I figured I'd slide in here, since you've been around for a while. Would you say that there's a completely unwritten expectation that people who do sufficiently bad (but not banworthy bad) things take a voluntary leave of absence? It feels like that's a pattern around here that I haven't seen anyone type out explicitly. -
Re: Well, I did ask for detail, and I got it by
on 2017-03-22 05:10:00 UTC
Link to this
Sorry for the delay. Life is crazy right now in several ways.
Yeah, that's what it felt like to me too. Again, obviously I still agree what you did was wrong, but the response seemed weird. Especially now that July herself has asked that you not be banned.
Also, yeah. I do think it's an easy path for humans - that's probably why it comes so easily to us here, too. I almost noted that it was a firmware problem in the OP. And I don't know how to solve it. Besides what we already have, which is asking people to try solving their issues with each other person to person. I do actually really like the idea of third-person mediators, but I'm not certain how it could best be implemented.
As for the screwup? I have no idea. I guess, ideally, the person directly harmed (July) would have a mediated conversation with you. I think it's a bit tough to say on that one because it was kind of a big deal, and you did move quickly to fix it before July actually got involved directly.
Your last point - having never actually considered that pattern, I do actually think you're right. That seems to be something that happens in cases like this pretty regularly. (Not that they are regular.) -
Mediation, policy changes, etc. by
on 2017-03-22 06:47:00 UTC
Link to this
(No problem on the delay. We all know this is a semi-asynchronous forum.)
So, I might have more concrete thoughts, but I think they need a short digression to come out right. So, several people have called for "mods". I think an accurate restatement of that is "The community shall select people who are expected to resolve bad behavior, and who shall impose, or threaten to impose, sanctions in order to do so.". As I said elsewhere in this thread, I happen to think that isn't needed.
Now, the call for "mediators" has a bit less meaning hanging off it, but I'll try to expand it it the same way. That is, the proposal is "The community shall select people who are expected to attempt to resolve bad behavior by offering to mediate between the involved parties. Community members are expected to accept these offers.". Well, that seems like a reasonable proposal, and I happen to agree that it might actually work, and at worst can't hurt.
As to actually implementing this proposal, I propose the simplest way possible. Declare it to be true! I don't have the precise wording of any needed changes to Section 2, but I'm voting in favor of making mediation an Official PPC Thing. I invite anyone else who thinks this is a good move to vote for it real quick.
Now, since I did say "the community shall select", I might as well start that too, so we don't have to be vague about it. Going off of my hazy memory and their behavior in this whole mess, I nominate VixenMage, Huinesoron, and Neshomeh as the poor schmucks who get to offer to help folks resolve disputes they're having.
On July, we have had a conversation. On my end, it gave me a much better understanding of what it is I did and why it was bad (you can see the results off of July's goodbye post), among other things. -
Okay, so 'mediators'. by
on 2017-03-22 07:49:00 UTC
Link to this
In the July-Iximaz incident, I emailled both parties to try and talk things through. I helped July in making her apology. I clarified the sincerity of that apology.
That did not work. The incident remained on Iximaz's mind for a year. What more do you feel a mediator should have done? And why do you feel that requiring someone to do it would be better than encouraging everyone to do so?
hS -
I (mostly) agree with VixenMage by
on 2017-03-20 18:28:00 UTC
Link to this
The only real place my opinions differ is with regard to point 1). I think we need some kind of mod that is more than The Nameless Admin, but less than a full out mod, with the power both on the Board and in the Discord. I will admit I don't have any ideas for exactly how we achieve that at that moment though. But I do think if it can be achieved it would be a good thing.
-
That's a good point. by
on 2017-03-21 03:18:00 UTC
Link to this
I'd say, go halfway. Ask The Nameless Admin to step in and respond to occasions of bullying when they're noticed - rather than just the current very minimalist approach.
Note that that might entail handing more people the keys to The Nameless Admin mask. -
Um. No thank you. (nm) by
on 2017-03-21 07:37:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Votes by
on 2017-03-20 17:23:00 UTC
Link to this
No mods, no bans.
There is clearly no consensus on bans, I cannot support any such action.
I do, however, propose that we find resources on recognizing abusive behaviors (especially on the internet, but also abuse and bullying theory in general) and have some requirement that oldbies / pgs / discorders / etc study them. That's been a common thread in the last several messes, I think that increasing our literacy on the matter is a necessary thing. -
All my votes. by
on 2017-03-20 17:22:00 UTC
Link to this
- No mods. If we have a problem with people failing to take personal responsibility, explicitly giving all the responsibility to someone else will not fix it.
2. 3-month ban for Tomash (which I don't think needs to be IP-enforced, for the record). I like you, I forgive you, but take a break.
2.5. 3-month Discord silence for everyone involved with going after July. If we can't make everyone take a break from it, I suppose this will do instead.
3. Guys, just make sure you've each learned your lessons here. Think things through. When emotions run high, step back. Don't be enablers. Don't be an echo chamber or a mob. No mods or rules can help with those things.
~Neshomeh
- No mods. If we have a problem with people failing to take personal responsibility, explicitly giving all the responsibility to someone else will not fix it.
-
Do you mind defining something for me? by
on 2017-03-20 18:22:00 UTC
Link to this
By that I mean, who do you mean by 'everyone involved with going after July.' Do you mean everyone who actively took part in the chat at that time? Those who explicitly wanted something 'done' about July (I hate how that sounds but I can't work out a better way of putting it)? Or is there some in between/other way of grouping people I haven't taken into consideration? I am merely wondering how you define that as I can (as seen) think of at least two ways it could be meant.
-
... Okay, I'm not escaping construction anytime soon. by
on 2017-03-22 16:28:00 UTC
Link to this
Basically, what I meant was anyone who explicitly wanted to make July an example for posterity (I think those were more or less the words used?), and also anybody who was doomsaying and adding to the general swirl of panic, which may or may not encompass everyone who was there, I'm not sure right now. I've got the day off tomorrow, so I'll try to pull it together then, but I didn't want to leave you hanging for two days.
~Neshomeh -
Don't worry, I know the feeling. by
on 2017-03-23 15:11:00 UTC
Link to this
And take your time, I don't mind.
-
I will get back to you. by
on 2017-03-21 15:50:00 UTC
Link to this
There's a large jackhammer beating up the pavement outside my apartment this morning, so the careful, in-depth review of the logs I wanted to do will have to wait. Sorry. {= (
~Neshomeh -
My vote by
on 2017-03-20 16:40:00 UTC
Link to this
1) No mods, don't think it will help.
2) I say we ban Tomash for maybe two, three months? Not a long time, but just for a while.
3) In some of the previous threads, someone suggested closing the discord for a while. (I think it was Neshomeh?) I think this might work.
Also, Maslab and Delta Juliette are my choice for new discord mods. -
Here's the ban votes from down below. by
on 2017-03-20 16:16:00 UTC
Link to this
I've gone through and tried to find the most recent votes by everyone who hasn't (yet) posted in this thread. Here's what I've got:
17th
Desdendelle - bans for everyone involved in the Discord discussion.
ninny4370 - no bans.
Sergio Turbo - abstain at this time.
[EvilAI]UBEROverlord - long-term ban for Tomash, some form of 'discipline' for Alleb and Granz, no bans for others.
Akrinor - no bans.
Alleb - no bans.
Aegis - no bans.
18th
PoorCynic - permaban for Tomash, year ban for Alleb, Granz, and Khrssty, 4 month ban for Aegis and Ekyl, no other bans.
SkarmorySilver - no bans.
Granz - no bans.
The Triumvirate - 6 month ban for Tomash, 2-3 month ban for Alleb, Granz, and Khrssty, 4 month ban for Ekyl, no other bans.
Iximaz - 6 month ban for Tomash, no other bans.
Seafarer - 6 month ban for Tomash, no bans for anyone else.
Badger421 - no bans.
Mattman the Comet - 1-6 month ban for Tomash, no other bans.
Neshomeh - 3 month ban for Tomash, no other bans.
19th
Hieronymus Graubart - no bans.
There's pretty clearly no support at this point for banning anyone other than Tomash. That could obviously change (anything's possible), but only four people have even suggested it.
The tallies for Tomash, including in this thread, are:
-Permaban: 2
-6 month ban: 4
-Long-term ban (unspecified): 1
-1-3 month ban: 2
-TOTAL BANS: 9
-No ban: 11
-Explicit abstain: 3
-TOTAL VOTES: 23
There may be some errors; feel free to recalculate when it needs updating.
hS -
I vote for a three-month ban for Tomash. by
on 2017-03-20 17:52:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm sorry, Tomash. I just feel this is right. I wish it weren't the case.
—doctorlit is torn between friends right now -
I vote to ban only Tomash by
on 2017-03-20 16:44:00 UTC
Link to this
I think 1-3 months is appropriate, now that I've thought it over and read what has been said.
-Phobos -
I respectfully abstain due to lack of knowledge. (nm) by
on 2017-03-20 14:06:00 UTC
Link to this
-
My three cents by
on 2017-03-20 09:09:00 UTC
Link to this
1) As I think I've made clear, I am completely pro mods. I wish we could all be trusted to use our judgement and get things done, but we quite obviously can't do that. We need mods to officially propose votes, to officially announce verdicts, and to just be proactive about things that cause a lot of dithering otherwise.
2) I vote to ban no one but Tomash, and only to ban him for a month, or not even that.
3) I don't think we should change the Discord. The community feeling of the PPC is a lot stronger because of it. Yes, it causes problems, but no more than the Board does. Things get quite heated here too. -
I'm abstaining from this vote (nm) by
on 2017-03-20 05:54:00 UTC
Link to this
-
My votes. by
on 2017-03-20 03:14:00 UTC
Link to this
- I am still debating internally about this one. hS makes some very good points about mods, but I can't help but think they would help immensely. For now, put me down for NO MODS
2. NO BANS.
3. Still thinking, no current ideas.
- I am still debating internally about this one. hS makes some very good points about mods, but I can't help but think they would help immensely. For now, put me down for NO MODS
-
Re: Shall we vote in an official capacity now? by
on 2017-03-20 00:35:00 UTC
Link to this
- I vote for no mods, of any sort.
2. No bans. I've been on too many boards and involved in too many communities that have had overzealous, almost draconian mods using banhammers like sniper rifles in a Deathmatch game. I don't want to see this community go the same way.
3.I don't know Discord well enough to suggest changes, so I'll leave that to those in the know.
- I vote for no mods, of any sort.
-
Good idea to move this to a new thread. (nm) by
on 2017-03-19 23:24:00 UTC
Link to this
-
If you like. by
on 2017-03-19 22:39:00 UTC
Link to this
- I vote no mods, per this post. I will also note here that the Discord, which has moderators, was the centre of both the GlarnBoudin incident and the doxxing one. Moderators are not the solution; the community taking responsibility is the solution.
2. I vote no bans, per this post.
3. I'm still thinking about this one.
hS
- I vote no mods, per this post. I will also note here that the Discord, which has moderators, was the centre of both the GlarnBoudin incident and the doxxing one. Moderators are not the solution; the community taking responsibility is the solution.
-
About the Discord: by
on 2017-03-22 13:09:00 UTC
Link to this
I've thought about this a lot, and I don't have an answer. It's clear that the witch-hunt was only made possible because of the real-time chat nature of the channel - look at how quickly it collapsed once it moved to the Board. Given that there's no support for just getting rid of the chat altogether, I think we need the following rules/mindsets to be taken seriously by the Discord:
1/ Don't talk about people behind their backs. Ever. For any reason. Iximaz has just announced she's leaving? Talk about it on the Board, if she's not in there with you. She's accused four people of bullying her? Sure, talk to the ones who are there with you - but if you want to talk about the others, do it on the Board. No exceptions, no excuses.
This includes positive discussion. If I've just posted a mission, and you're all raving about it in the Discord - so what? That doesn't do anything to make me feel good about it. Whether you want to congratulate someone, or express sympathy, or condemn them - if they're not in the Discord at the time, do it on the Board.
2/ The Discord is not a place to make decisions. Ever. Unless you're in a game of some sort, if you're asking 'what should we do?', you need to take that to the Board. Put it on the permanent record, get the input of the entire community - heck, even in the Discord, not everyone's there all the time!
These aren't rules designed to fix every problem. They wouldn't do a thing about the GlarnBoudin incident, for instance. But I think they can, will, and should deal with the major issue with the live-chat format: the tendency for everyone in a conversation to just flow along with it, however insane it ends up looking from the outside.
hS -
Terminology by
on 2017-03-19 22:35:00 UTC
Link to this
I think it would be better to say not just bans in your second point but also any other reprimands that are being handed out as well.
Also in addition to the third point, Discord mods (although that seems to have been all but decided)
-
No Subject by
on 2017-03-19 22:39:00 UTC
Link to this
Originally I was not planning on even saying goodbye, just allowing the fact that I've been posting less and less to say so, and finally letting myself disappear, but that clearly didn't work and isn't going to work.
When all of this began unfolding, I was at work. It wasn't until I went outside for fresh air that I got bombarded by messages: Scapegrace calling me an awful person who needs friends who will, I quote "rock you back and forth in the puddle of your own endless f***ing self-pity" and telling me to leave the PPC. Desdendelle who had kept messaging me to go 'they're talking about you in the Discord' and apologizing, and trying to make sure that I was okay once the post had gone up on the Board.
I've been on the internet since well before I was eleven years old. The PPC was the first place I got a death threat. Only place to have small groups decide they need to get rid of me whatever the method. Now it's the first place to dox me, unintentional or not.
Clearly this isn't a safe place for me. I won't kill or hurt myself over the perceptions that others have of me here, but you are not a safe place for me- for my mental health, my happiness, and now possibly even my career.
Tomash already apologized to me. But plenty of the people in the Discord saw nothing wrong with their behavior until Huinesoron said he saw the logs and pointed that part out. Until someone else pointed out the potential illegality. Only then did the apologies begin to pour out, and with plenty excuses and reasons attached to them. Until the logs became public, people were still in full agreement with what they said and did in the Discord and saw nothing that they had done as wrong. The timing and mentality with all of this should be very, very concerning to all of you.
So, here's the official 'goodbye' so many of you demanded. You guys win.
I'm not withdrawing anything I added from the shared universe, but I don't want my characters to be used or anything from my stories to be referenced.
I am not interested in being contacted further by anyone here regarding this, so please don't. To make this clear, I will be removing my contact information from the wiki. -
:( by
on 2017-03-27 23:04:00 UTC
Link to this
July, you are the big sister I never had and I love you dearly. I hope that you will eventually return, even if that's not likely to happen. I will try to keep in touch and I hope that you know that you do have people who care about you here.
-
I'm sorry. by
on 2017-03-22 07:11:00 UTC
Link to this
Both in a general sympathy sense, that you're leaving, and in the sense that I held onto a grudge for far, far too long, and in indulging it, helped poison the well against you. I'm sure, despite not being in the logs, some of the ugly feeling about you could be traced back to things I've said.
On a more selfish note, I'm sad because I was hoping to rebuild some kind of a friendship, and though I hope you'll be willing to keep talking, it kind of sucks to lose your voice here just as I was hoping to reconnect.
At any rate, I wish you the best of luck in your life going forward. -
:( by
on 2017-03-20 20:57:00 UTC
Link to this
And July stepped into her private boat and waved goodbye
and sailed back over a year
and in and out of weeks
and through a day
and into the night of her very own room
where she found her supper waiting for her.
And it was still hot.
hS -
I am so sorry that this happened to you again. by
on 2017-03-20 20:15:00 UTC
Link to this
According to your wish, the story of how Hieronymus the hermit became a part-time knight will never be told.
Fare well.
HG -
I apologize. by
on 2017-03-20 19:01:00 UTC
Link to this
I was far too passive during the events on the chat, and the fact they disturbed me should have prompted me to act more, not stay away.
I wish you well for the future. -
I love you, July. I'll be keeping in touch. :) (nm) by
on 2017-03-20 17:50:00 UTC
Link to this
-
My apologies by
on 2017-03-20 16:26:00 UTC
Link to this
I do not know wether you are going to read this post or not, but in case you are, I want to apologize to you.
Even though I did not post as much as others during the incident, I am still guilty, like every other person present at the time, of not stepping in. Yes, emotions were running high. Still, that does not excuse the fact that I did not take a step back and did not realize what kind of action was being discussed. Instead all I said was that I was "not sure" about posting the picture on the board.
I know how hypocritical it comes off to apologize so late, but I both wanted to take a few step backs and think about what I was going to say, and go through the chat logs so I knew exactly what happened and what was being said, and what I did. Emotions can cloud the memoryjust like they cloud the judgement, and I did not want to make the mistake of letting that be the case this time.
Once again I apologize to you. I can understand your decision to leave, especially after this incident, and I cannot and have no right to try and stop you.
~Akrinor -
*hugs* (nm) by
on 2017-03-20 14:06:00 UTC
Link to this
-
Oh god (censored swears inside if you want to avoid them) by
on 2017-03-20 01:09:00 UTC
Link to this
(I've said a lot of this stuff to July, but I think it needs to be out here)
Outing someone's real name on the Internet without consent like I did in a moment of complete idiocy is wrong in all circumstances, but now it seems that this case was worse than most.
It appears that my belief (stated in another post) that none of us would want July killed isn't (or used to not be) true. That means that my posting in the Discord could have actually had a decent chance of ... f**k. I didn't know about any of the history until yesterday afternoon, but that's no excuse. I f**ked up real bad there, and I wish I could go back in time and slap myself silly.
Now, I have to ask. Did anyone who was participating in chat at the time know about this stuff, especially the death threats? If so, I'm surprised that I didn't get any calls to "DELETE THAT NOW" or similar, either in chat or privately, from someone who knew the full potential consequences of my actions. I assure you, I would've listened. -
It wasn't from this time. by
on 2017-03-20 01:20:00 UTC
Link to this
The death threat in question was from the last time all of this happened, here in the PPC with the irc.
Thankfully they didn't know my actual name at the time. -
That's reassuring by
on 2017-03-20 01:39:00 UTC
Link to this
Hopefully, this person either doesn't want to kill you anymore or wasn't on the Discord at the time.
-
If by any chance you feel like reading this... by
on 2017-03-20 00:16:00 UTC
Link to this
These are the first words that I mean to direct at you since the incident I've caused, and now so it happens those shall also be the last. I know you hate me, and you have the full right to do so, but for that one final time I would like to get your attention:
I have no excuses for my behaviour, both this one and almost six months ago. I didn't do anything to prevent the mob from rising, I let my emotional attachment overtake me, and for that I will accept any punishment the community should impose onto me. The previous time I acted high-and-mighty, tried to force my way of thinking onto you, and completely ignored your decisions, all while under the delusion of being a friend.
Truth be told, I am still grateful to you for what you did back in 2015 for me. You are honest, direct, and no-nonsense to the absolute maximum, but whether you are a bully or not... that's not for me to say, and I shouldn't build my opinion based on the events I wasn't there for.
I will not repeat my mistake and will not even think about stopping you from leaving. What we did put you in potential danger and as much as I would like for us to part ways with at least neutral relationship, that's unfortunately nothing I can do about anymore.
So, to sum up, if any of this has any worth to you anymore: I am sorry, JulyFlame, for all this messed up stuff I've put you through. -
Matt. Dude. by
on 2017-03-20 01:56:00 UTC
Link to this
July has made it very clear that she does not want you to talk to her, at all, ever. You don't get to decide when or where that ends. This was not smart. You HAVE repeated your mistake. Please get it through your head that NO means NO.
~Neshomeh -
That is true. by
on 2017-03-20 09:30:00 UTC
Link to this
But it was either that, or not apologising for what I did at all, which is unacceptable.
-
A little feminist theory for you. by
on 2017-03-20 16:46:00 UTC
Link to this
1- is your apology likely to make July feel at ease or upset if she sees it, given your past interactions?
2- is your apology, therefore, when you examine the likely outcome, for July's benefit or yours?
3- consider that our society has a terrible habit of making women bear the burden of men's feelings, even in cases where they are trying to actively disengage. (For example, in the women's day post, your desire to be an ally took precedence over one individual woman's desire to not interact with you.)
4- in the future, when someone tells you to leave them alone, apologize ONCE, and then . . . leave them alone. Period. No redemption arc, no reminders, no continued getting other people to mediate, no continued and protracted apologies. Just end it there. If she hasn't accepted by now, she's not going to, and this only serves the purpose of making her more uncomfortable. -
Thank you. And I do mean it. (nm) by
on 2017-03-20 17:39:00 UTC
Link to this
-
I'm sorry. by
on 2017-03-19 23:09:00 UTC
Link to this
There's no point in trying to make a long post explaining myself because I know nothing I say can ever make up for what I did. It was wrong, it was stupid, and it was horrible of me to say what I did and cause this to happen to you.
Take care. -
What I did isn't your fault by
on 2017-03-20 02:38:00 UTC
Link to this
Yes, I was worried about you at the time I posted that information in chat. However, that absolutely doesn't excuse my actions, and it certainly doesn't make you responsible for them. You didn't cause me to make that mistake. Neither you nor your words somehow crawled into my brain and turned off my ability to not do something really stupid for a few seconds.
Like Nesh said somewhere, we all need to take responsibility for our own choices. I'd prefer that you stop blaming yourself for mine.
-
Seeing as how this board is dead... by
on 2017-03-20 00:27:00 UTC
Link to this
I will use it to test a thing! A wondrous thing!
maybe -
This is also to test the thing! (nm) by
on 2017-03-20 00:28:00 UTC
Link to this
-
This is to keep the Board un-deleted. (nm) by
on 2017-05-04 06:18:00 UTC
Link to this
-
And this is because I need a spoiler block. by
on 2017-05-25 11:57:00 UTC
Link to this
Spoiler SPOILER spoiler spoilER SPOILer sPoIlEr SpOiLeR spOILer Spoilerman Does Whatever A Spoiler Can don't spoil my er How do you solve a problem like a spoiler? What do you call a one-eyed spoiler? Spoi spoi spoi spoi spoiler SPAAAAAAAACE! Sorry about him. ~spoiler block
Is that enough? I'm running out of ideas...
hS
-
Betas for Permission request by
on 2017-03-20 09:17:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm currently working on my Permission request. If you're interested in beta-ing, could you please PM me on Discord.
-
A little more information by
on 2017-03-21 16:07:00 UTC
Link to this
I'm just looking for a second opinion on flow, humor, and stuff like that. I already have a primary beta.
You can also reply to this post and give me your email if that's easier than PMing me. -
Works for me! E-mail is clickabuu. (nm) by
on 2017-03-21 19:21:00 UTC
Link to this